Minimal SciFinder support will be in the next nightly build. We'll need tag
and type mappings as discussed previously to make it more full-featured, but it
should be a good start.
--
Adam
-
This SF.net email is sponsored
On Wednesday, August 15, 2007, at 09:28AM, "Christiaan Hofman" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>On 15 Aug 2007, at 5:21 PM, Holger Frauenrath wrote:
>> So, if I understand this correctly: the entries would have to be of
>> the form
>>
>> BibTeXFieldNamesForSciFinderTags = {
>> "FIELD
On 15 Aug 2007, at 5:21 PM, Holger Frauenrath wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
>> Thanks, that's nice to hear! It's also a good way to preface a
>> feature request :).
>
> Shit! How did you notice? ;-)
>
>> This looks like it would be really easy to parse. Christiaan,
>> post if
>> you start working on it
On 15 Aug 2007, at 4:41 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
> Hello Holger,
>
> On Aug 15, 2007, at 01:30, Holger Frauenrath wrote:
>
>> after a number of people here on this list helped me to get started
>> with BibDesk a couple of months ago, I have been using it ever since,
>> and I am more than happy
Hi Adam,
> Thanks, that's nice to hear! It's also a good way to preface a
> feature request :).
Shit! How did you notice? ;-)
> This looks like it would be really easy to parse. Christiaan, post if
> you start working on it; otherwise I'll take a look at it later
> today. No point in duplicat
Hello Holger,
On Aug 15, 2007, at 01:30, Holger Frauenrath wrote:
> after a number of people here on this list helped me to get started
> with BibDesk a couple of months ago, I have been using it ever since,
> and I am more than happy with it. As I think it is possible that
> software developers
Hello everybody,
after a number of people here on this list helped me to get started
with BibDesk a couple of months ago, I have been using it ever since,
and I am more than happy with it. As I think it is possible that
software developers more often hear complaints from users about the
th
