Re: Query on the Order in which RR are answered by Bind of Order/preference are Same

In message <20160718141147.ga16...@fantomas.sk>, Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes: > On 18.07.16 13:59, Harshith Mulky wrote: > >I had a query on how the following Records can be ordered on how the Records > >are configured in the > Zone file > > > >I have done 2 different Tests > > > >I have

Re: Questions on how to setup Reverse DNS in bind 9

Oscar, On point 4 there, At this time franklin.jetbbs.com ONLY RESOLVES TO 104.238.117.105 The way I wanted it was 104.238.117.105 AND 132.148.11.44to point to jetbbs.com but I think I setup the DNS record wrong. I just added another A record for jetbbs.com and added the IP address

Re: weird transfer-source problems with one DNS node

Negative Ghostrider...: [root@foo:~]# iptables -t raw -nvL Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination

Re: weird transfer-source problems with one DNS node

I don't think my earlier response to this has made it past moderation, but an update: iptables looks pretty benign to me...: Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywherestate RELATED,ESTABLISHED

Re: weird transfer-source problems with one DNS node

In article , Ian Veach wrote: > So unless I'm crazy (possible, regardless)... named is reporting using 230, > but OS is showing 240 (and remote host logs confirm 240)!? Could something in iptables be transforming

Re: weird transfer-source problems with one DNS node

Der, sorry. Machines are all RHEL 6.8, running the BIND provided by RH: 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.47.rc1.el6 Restarting BIND (or even the OS) doesn't seem to change anything. I don't seem to have scan as an option for rndc. I assume it's in a newer version that RH doesn't yet provide for RHEL 6.

Re: weird transfer-source problems with one DNS node

Ian Veach wrote: > > So, any ideas on why I would see that slave initiate transfers on it's OS > IP versus the transfer-source IP... especially when the other three work > fine? What does the log say about interface addresses? Which version of BIND are you running? Has

weird transfer-source problems with one DNS node

I'm having a weird problem where one of our DNS servers is not communicating on the expected transfer-source IPs (but the rest are). They're generally configured exact/similar, but there's obviously something causing a difference on the one node. We run four slave DNS as public NS (with private

Re: Questions on how to setup Reverse DNS in bind 9

On Sun, 17 Jul 2016, Spork Schivago wrote: > So, in the /var/named directory, I create a file > called: 0.117.238.104.in-addr.arpa > > The contents of 0.117.238.104.in-addr.arpa are as follows: > $TTL 1D > @       IN SOA  ns1.jetbbs.com. spork.jetbbs.com. ( >                                      

Re: doubt about queries.log format

Thanks Tony for your answer, and is there any possibility using other category and/or debug level to obtain the record and the ip resolved in the same log entry? Regards Manuel 2016-07-18 12:50 GMT+02:00 Tony Finch : > Manuel Ramírez wrote: > > > >

Re: Query on the Order in which RR are answered by Bind of Order/preference are Same

On 18.07.16 13:59, Harshith Mulky wrote: I had a query on how the following Records can be ordered on how the Records are configured in the Zone file I have done 2 different Tests I have configured following records in the Zone file e164enum.net with TTL value as 0

Query on the Order in which RR are answered by Bind of Order/preference are Same

Hello Experts, I had a query on how the following Records can be ordered on how the Records are configured in the Zone file I have done 2 different Tests I have configured following records in the Zone file e164enum.net with TTL value as 0 2.7.5.2.7.9.2.5.3.1.8.e164enum.net. IN NAPTR 100 10

RE: Questions on how to setup Reverse DNS in bind 9

I haven't done it with GoDaddy but many providers WILL delegate reverse IPs to you if you request it. Personal editorial comment: Were it me I wouldn't use GoDaddy for anything. I detest GoDaddy because their whole business model seems aimed at forcing you to leap through hoops to do

Re: SOA record not signed with new key at key-rollover

Am 18.07.2016 um 12:48 schrieb Tony Finch: > If your rollover time is much shorter then you are testing something that > is more like an emergency unplanned rollover. At the moment I am merely testing in this "high-frequency" setup to get a good feeling for the mechanics and the interaction

Re: doubt about queries.log format

Manuel Ramírez wrote: > > I would like to know if is possible to see in the queries.log output the ip > address resolved No, it only logs the query not the answers. Have a look at passive DNS or dnstap if you want more detailed telemetry. Tony. --

Re: SOA record not signed with new key at key-rollover

Nis Wechselberg wrote: > Am I getting it right that the rest of the zone is not (re)signed > because the current signature is still valid for some time? > > So if I were to set sig-validity-interval to a shorter value, this would > help with the issue? If you are testing out a

doubt about queries.log format

Hi, first of all sorry for my poor English. I would like to know if is possible to see in the queries.log output the ip address resolved, for example, this is one line from the queries.log: *18-Jul-2016 10:54:15.226 queries: info: client 10.1.116.27#10760 (update.microsoft.com