Hi,
Just thougth I might post an excerpt of the file which I use to
redefines my aterm colors. Just stick it in your .Xdefaults /
.Xresources file and if you're using xterm or rxvt, just change the word
aterm to xterm and rxvt (respectively).
--[ snip ]--
! apearence
aterm.transparent: true
a
Yesterday at 4:24pm, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry said:
> >
> > Here are a few of my intial findings. The proposed algorithm relies on
> > knowing the location of all windows. It then creates a list of the
> > uncovered desktop area expressed in rectangles. This means that there
> > would need to be no
On Monday 26 November 2001 12:28, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
> Yesterday at 4:24pm, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry said:
> > > Here are a few of my intial findings. The proposed algorithm relies
> > > on knowing the location of all windows. It then creates a list of
> > > the uncovered desktop area expressed
Isn't that the NumLock is on or off ?
Btw Sean,
what is your position concerning one of the few
built-in shortcuts ( ALT + MB1 to move a window ) ?
It only works when Num-Lock is off .
Should't the Shortcut work all the time ?
I thought Jeff Raven wanted to make it an option but
...
Olivier
regarding proposed smartplacement algoritm:
> On Monday 26 November 2001 12:28, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
> > Yesterday at 4:24pm, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry said:
> > > > Here are a few of my intial findings. The proposed algorithm relies
> > > > on knowing the location of all windows. It then creates
Hi,
The conversation about the memory consumption of xterm has got my
attention.
I have an i486DX at home with 8 MB RAM and a Debian Potato. I've tried
to make things as small and minimal as possible, but maybe I do not know
all the possible alternatives.
Would you please help me with some sugges
Peter Szekszardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you please help me with some suggestions that which programs use
> less cpu and memory than others?
Compile all your apps yourself without debugging enabled (or strip them
after compiling). That can reduce the size.
> For example aterm uses l
I think I might have found one of the causes of memory leaking in
bbkeys, but unfortunately, I simply do not have the time to track it
down and fix it. (I would like to have a little chat with whoever came
up with the idea of "exams".)
Here is the initial memory usage of bbkeys:
VmSize: 3496
Peter Szekszardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would you please help me with some suggestions that which programs use
> less cpu and memory than others? For example aterm uses less resource
> than xterm. Could you please suggest me a good editor both for console
> and X that uses less than vim/vi
On Sat, Nov24,01 12:09, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 24-Nov-2001 Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, scott wrote:
> >
> >> I'm using BB 0.61.1 (with a patch to make an ALT+click anywhere
> >> on the window bring it forward, and bbkeys)
> >
> > I don't understand why you have a patc
Jan Schaumann wrote:
>
> Peter Szekszardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Any ideas for a
> > good browser?
>
> Console: links. Beats the crap out of lynx.
> Graphical: all suck. Try amaya.
Amaya? This is the wors GUI browser I ever seen.
It's made by w3c and incompatible with their own speci
A simple script to remove debugging from ALL applications:
cd /
find /{,usr,usr/local}/{bin,sbin,lib} -type f -exec /usr/bin/strip \
--strip-debug '{}' ';'
Debugging symbols are usually not needed. This can save LOTS of drive
space as well as memory.
- Chris
On Mon, 26 Nov
On 26-Nov-2001 Olivier Roulet wrote:
> Isn't that the NumLock is on or off ?
>
> Btw Sean,
> what is your position concerning one of the few
> built-in shortcuts ( ALT + MB1 to move a window ) ?
> It only works when Num-Lock is off .
> Should't the Shortcut work all the time ?
> I thought Jeff
for graphical browsers, you might look at skipstone
aloha,
dave
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 04:48:19PM +0100, Peter Szekszardi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The conversation about the memory consumption of xterm has got my
> attention.
> I have an i486DX at home with 8 MB RAM and a Debian Potato. I've tried
> t
On Mon, Nov26,01 13:23, Dave Price wrote:
> for graphical browsers, you might look at skipstone
>
> aloha,
> dave
>
but common... in all honest... X itself is pretty heavy you can be VERY
productive on the console... and I'd recommend sticking to that.
But that's just MO... and the only way
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:35:18PM -0500, Derek Cunningham wrote:
> On Mon, Nov26,01 13:23, Dave Price wrote:
> > for graphical browsers, you might look at skipstone
> >
> > aloha,
> > dave
> >
I personally find Skipstone to be buggy, non keyboard friendly, and it has a few UI
pains (for exampl
On Mon, Nov26,01 16:11, Ben Neuman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:35:18PM -0500, Derek Cunningham wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov26,01 13:23, Dave Price wrote:
> > > for graphical browsers, you might look at skipstone
> > >
> > > aloha,
> > > dave
> > >
>
> I personally find Skipstone to be buggy, n
> It's based on mozilla, and as such, I've found that Galeon (also based on
> mozilla) was a dog. When I load Konq... I'm happy... it's responsive, and
> there's definately no lame interface choices... so why change? Konq is good
> (well, i'll s/good/great/g; just as SOON as I can get flash/javasc
Hi,,
I am using Sylpheed Claws 0.6.5. for e-mail. When I search for mail
with this program Blackbox often crashes and takes down X with it,
especially when I search in folders with a lot of mail. I have tried
other WM's (icewm, xfce, kde, fvwm) on my computer, but it is only
Blackbox that has thi
On Mon, 2001-11-26 at 21:06, Christian Dysthe wrote:
> Hi,,
>
> I am using Sylpheed Claws 0.6.5. for e-mail. When I search for mail
> with this program Blackbox often crashes and takes down X with it,
> especially when I search in folders with a lot of mail. I have tried
> other WM's (icewm, xfce
On 26 Nov 2001 21:11:18 -0600
"Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you tried another mail client?
Well, yes, but Sylpheed is the one I like. The only problem with it
is that it takes down Blackbox for some reason when I try to search
for mail. Since this isn't a problem in any o
On Mon, 2001-11-26 at 21:30, Christian Dysthe wrote:
> On 26 Nov 2001 21:11:18 -0600
> "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Have you tried another mail client?
>
> Well, yes, but Sylpheed is the one I like. The only problem with it
> is that it takes down Blackbox for some reason
Okay i am fairly new to linux and i have a fairly old system and someone
recomended blackbox and after trying like 5 different WM's i found that
blackbox ws the fastest and i like it the best too :P But i was wondering if
there is any way to customize it.
> Okay i am fairly new to linux and i have a fairly old system and someone
> recomended blackbox and after trying like 5 different WM's i found that
> blackbox ws the fastest and i like it the best too :P But i was wondering if
> there is any way to customize it.
>
Oh GOD yes. I Suggest getti
24 matches
Mail list logo
