On 25-May-2002 Robert wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>>
>>> And to confirm (though I guess its old news by now) that I'm seeing this
>>> problem with alpha5 and 1.0.6 and mandrake 8.2
>>>
>>> Time to download the new one and I might even try to have time to revi
>
> It's great to have the bbtools back! Boy, these alpha releases are
> really comin' along, this one seems pretty damn solid. Are we to expect
> the next release to be of the beta persuasion?
this release is a little less stable than the last few in terms of transient
behaviour (we still are
On 25-May-2002 Matt Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-05-25 at 18:51, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> >
>> > Only thing I've spotted so far is that windows are still getting placed
>> > underneath the toolbar (although, and I may be wrong about this, it
>> > seems to be only transients - dialogs, progre
On Fri, 24 May 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>
>> And to confirm (though I guess its old news by now) that I'm seeing this
>> problem with alpha5 and 1.0.6 and mandrake 8.2
>>
>> Time to download the new one and I might even try to have time to review
>> code..
>>
>
> we are very curio
On Fri, 24 May 2002 09:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The "every waking moment for Matt" release
>
> alpha7 has lots of small fixes for lots of things.
>
> Dock apps work better (even wmswallow)
>
> little pixel offset issues solved, no more overlaps
>
> s
On Sat, 2002-05-25 at 18:51, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> >
> > Only thing I've spotted so far is that windows are still getting placed
> > underneath the toolbar (although, and I may be wrong about this, it
> > seems to be only transients - dialogs, progress windows and the like.)
> >
>
> any
>
> Only thing I've spotted so far is that windows are still getting placed
> underneath the toolbar (although, and I may be wrong about this, it
> seems to be only transients - dialogs, progress windows and the like.)
>
any examples I can recreate here?
On 24-May-2002 Scott Furt wrote:
> When i resize/move windows now, the little box that
> shows X: ... Y: ... looks like it inheirits the background
> image from my desktop, which is unfortunate, becuase
> black text on a dark background is near impossible to read.
cvs now uses window.label.focus
On Sat, 2002-05-25 at 04:38, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> The "every waking moment for Matt" release
Woohoo!! :)
Only thing I've spotted so far is that windows are still getting placed
underneath the toolbar (although, and I may be wrong about this, it
seems to be only transients - dialogs, prog
On 25-May-2002 xOr wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 05:25:45PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> On 24-May-2002 Scott Furt wrote:
>> > When i resize/move windows now, the little box that
>> > shows X: ... Y: ... looks like it inheirits the background
>> > image from my desktop, which is unfortu
I don't know whether this has been in other releases, because I only used the
Gnome System Monitor after installing the alpha7 release.
The first issue I had was moving a file between two Rox-FIler windows, and the
"Move" dialog box left a border and titlebar artifact. btw: this has not
repeated.
On 25-May-2002 xOr wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 05:25:45PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> On 24-May-2002 Scott Furt wrote:
>> > When i resize/move windows now, the little box that
>> > shows X: ... Y: ... looks like it inheirits the background
>> > image from my desktop, which is unfortu
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 05:25:45PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 24-May-2002 Scott Furt wrote:
> > When i resize/move windows now, the little box that
> > shows X: ... Y: ... looks like it inheirits the background
> > image from my desktop, which is unfortunate, becuase
> > black text on
On 24-May-2002 Scott Furt wrote:
> When i resize/move windows now, the little box that
> shows X: ... Y: ... looks like it inheirits the background
> image from my desktop, which is unfortunate, becuase
> black text on a dark background is near impossible to read.
it actually reads 'window.label.
On 24-May-2002 Scott Furt wrote:
> I was playing around with snapping today (I'm running CVS
> from 05/23), and noticed that windows will snap to the "edge"
> of the slit, even if the window is nowhere near the slit.
>
> This might be somewhat related to the XMMS-snapping problem
> that was repor
When i resize/move windows now, the little box that
shows X: ... Y: ... looks like it inheirits the background
image from my desktop, which is unfortunate, becuase
black text on a dark background is near impossible to read.
Another good GUI unzip/zip tool is the ROX Archive tool.
It's an icon on the desktop, and you drag files or archive
onto it and it tgz/un-tgz things.
http://rox.sf.net/archive.php3
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> I am using cxunzip (a GNOME unzip tool); if I kill it or properly exit it,
> it closes fin
I was playing around with snapping today (I'm running CVS
from 05/23), and noticed that windows will snap to the "edge"
of the slit, even if the window is nowhere near the slit.
This might be somewhat related to the XMMS-snapping problem
that was reported a while back.
Screenshot:
http://furt.co
On 24-May-2002 Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With a fresh (today, approx. 23.00 CET) CVS, more NEdit oddities:
>
> Not consistent, but:
> - Open NEdit (I did from ROX 1.3)
> - Change something
> - Click close button, a dialog Save Y/N pops up
> - Choose No
> - NEdit closes but a fanthom
Hi all,
With a fresh (today, approx. 23.00 CET) CVS, more NEdit oddities:
Not consistent, but:
- Open NEdit (I did from ROX 1.3)
- Change something
- Click close button, a dialog Save Y/N pops up
- Choose No
- NEdit closes but a fanthom BlackboxWindow remains on the screen (with
not updated NEdi
Hoi Jamin,
Op Fri, 24 May 2002 13:21:30 -0500
schreef "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 24 May 2002 09:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
> "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As before, please help us test it is time for a beta series!
>
> Got an oddity for you. I normally
>>
>
> And to confirm (though I guess its old news by now) that I'm seeing this
> problem with alpha5 and 1.0.6 and mandrake 8.2
>
> Time to download the new one and I might even try to have time to review
> code..
>
we are very curious if you can reproduce it with alpha7.
On Fri, 24 May 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thursday 23 May 2002 16:51, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> A user has reported that nautilus 1.0.6 that came with Mandrake will not
>> focus under the current alpha series.
>>
>> Can anyone verify this?
> I have Mandrake 8.1 and it's nautilus 1.0.
Martin Rowe wrote:
>On Friday 24 May 2002 9:23 pm, xOr wrote:
>
>>On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 10:00:38PM +0200, Arjen Hommersom wrote:
>>
[fullscreen vnc does not work]
>>>The same happens with mplayer on fullscreen. Maybe usefull for
>>>debugging..
>>>
>>That bug *is* new to cvs then. I've
On 24-May-2002 Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> I am using cxunzip (a GNOME unzip tool); if I kill it or properly exit it,
> it closes fine.
>
> But if I click the blackbox close button "X", I receive a GNOME
> Application crash:
>
> crashed due to fatal error.
> (Segmentation fault)
>
> I think bla
> One oddity that made itself obvious after a Windowmanagers...Restart was
> the way windows are maximised. I have the toolbar at the bottom middle
> and the slit on the bottom right. Usually I only have bbkeys docked
> there, with the mini icon. That stands slightly taller than the toolbar
>
I am using cxunzip (a GNOME unzip tool); if I kill it or properly exit it,
it closes fine.
But if I click the blackbox close button "X", I receive a GNOME
Application crash:
crashed due to fatal error.
(Segmentation fault)
I think blackbox does a XUnmapWindow(3X11) when the close button is
On Friday 24 May 2002 9:23 pm, xOr wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 10:00:38PM +0200, Arjen Hommersom wrote:
> > >[fullscreen vnc does not work]
> >
> > The same happens with mplayer on fullscreen. Maybe usefull for
> > debugging..
>
> That bug *is* new to cvs then. I've done this with mplayer for
On Friday 24 May 2002 9:05 pm, Jamin W.Collins wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2002 22:00:38 +0200
>
> "Arjen Hommersom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >[fullscreen vnc does not work]
> >
> > The same happens with mplayer on fullscreen. Maybe usefull for
> > debugging..
>
> Just to clarify, the problem on
Jamin W. Collins wrote:
>On Fri, 24 May 2002 22:00:38 +0200
>"Arjen Hommersom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>>[fullscreen vnc does not work]
>>>
>>The same happens with mplayer on fullscreen. Maybe usefull for
>>debugging..
>>
>
>Just to clarify, the problem only occurs when switching from windo
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 10:00:38PM +0200, Arjen Hommersom wrote:
> >
> >
> >[fullscreen vnc does not work]
> >
> The same happens with mplayer on fullscreen. Maybe usefull for debugging..
That bug *is* new to cvs then. I've done this with mplayer for ages.
(switching to fullscreen and running it
On Fri, 24 May 2002 22:00:38 +0200
"Arjen Hommersom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >[fullscreen vnc does not work]
> >
> The same happens with mplayer on fullscreen. Maybe usefull for
> debugging..
Just to clarify, the problem only occurs when switching from windowed view
to fullscreen view. If
>
>
>[fullscreen vnc does not work]
>
The same happens with mplayer on fullscreen. Maybe usefull for debugging..
Arjen Hommersom
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 09:05:22PM +0200, Per-Arne Holtmon Ak? wrote:
> Hello guys.
>
> Thought I'd just drop a note about this. I updated my local CVS of
> blackbox right now (Fri May 24 21:00:15 CEST 2002), and it refuses to
> compile. I am running a FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT snapshot from 21st of Ma
On 24-May-2002 Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2002 12:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
> "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> hmm, no vnc to play with, makes this a tough one to debug.
>
> Couple of options. I could provide a system to VNC into, or it is also
> possible to VNC into
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 12:11:40 +, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 24-May-2002 Per-Arne Holtmon Akø wrote:
> > Hello guys.
> >
> > Thought I'd just drop a note about this. I updated my local CVS of
> > blackbox right now (Fri May 24 21:00:15 CEST 2002), and it refuses to
> > compile. I am ru
On Fri, 24 May 2002 12:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hmm, no vnc to play with, makes this a tough one to debug.
Couple of options. I could provide a system to VNC into, or it is also
possible to VNC into the same system. Or if I had an idea what to look
f
On 24-May-2002 Per-Arne Holtmon Akø wrote:
> Hello guys.
>
> Thought I'd just drop a note about this. I updated my local CVS of
> blackbox right now (Fri May 24 21:00:15 CEST 2002), and it refuses to
> compile. I am running a FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT snapshot from 21st of May,
> 12:00:00, so that migh
On 24-May-2002 Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> This problem isn't new to the CVS version, I just
> remembered that it happens.
>
> If you open a normal windowed VNC connection, and then
> try to switch to fullscreen view, the VNC view will
> disappear. The application is still running. However
> the di
Hello guys.
Thought I'd just drop a note about this. I updated my local CVS of
blackbox right now (Fri May 24 21:00:15 CEST 2002), and it refuses to
compile. I am running a FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT snapshot from 21st of May,
12:00:00, so that might be the cause. Anyway, the failed build session
is att
This problem isn't new to the CVS version, I just
remembered that it happens.
If you open a normal windowed VNC connection, and then
try to switch to fullscreen view, the VNC view will
disappear. The application is still running. However
the display window is nowhere to be found.
To replicate:
-
On Fri, 24 May 2002 11:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brad added new code for group window handling and transients. It is
> possible nedit hits a rough spot in this code.
>
> If you could come up with a guaranteed way to recreate it and post a bug
> that wo
On 24-May-2002 Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2002 09:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
> "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> As before, please help us test it is time for a beta series!
>
> Got an oddity for you. I normally use Nedit for my GUI text editing
> purposes. After my la
On Fri, 24 May 2002 09:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As before, please help us test it is time for a beta series!
Got an oddity for you. I normally use Nedit for my GUI text editing
purposes. After my last update from CVS, I noticed some strange
behaviour
On Fri, 24 May 2002 09:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The "every waking moment for Matt" release
>
> alpha7 has lots of small fixes for lots of things.
(snip)
> As before, please help us test it is time for a beta series!
You are going to spoil us! Just
The "every waking moment for Matt" release
alpha7 has lots of small fixes for lots of things.
Dock apps work better (even wmswallow)
little pixel offset issues solved, no more overlaps
some optimizations added and excessive redraws cleaned up
better window group support
better dock app suppor
On Friday 24 May 2002 16:48, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > If that can help, I ran nautilus (something that my poor machine can
> > barely afford !) and I noticed that indeed the main window refuses to
> > be focused.
>
> thanks Bertrand this really helps. It does clearly state that it does
> no
> If that can help, I ran nautilus (something that my poor machine can barely
> afford !) and I noticed that indeed the main window refuses to be focused.
>
thanks Bertrand this really helps. It does clearly state that it does not want
focus. Will look into this a little further, this sound l
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 01:26:39PM +0200, Martin Egholm Nielsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >>Ok, I've looked and looked, bblaunch is no where to be
> >>found! :-(
> >>Can anybody hand me a link?
> >After poking about a bit I found this:
> >ftp://ftp.hu.debian.org/debian/pool/main/b/bblaunch/
> >
> >They w
Hi,
>>Ok, I've looked and looked, bblaunch is no where to be
>>found! :-(
>>Can anybody hand me a link?
> After poking about a bit I found this:
> ftp://ftp.hu.debian.org/debian/pool/main/b/bblaunch/
>
> They worked for me. Gimme a holler if they don't, I can put them up some
> other place.
Wel
Hi,
* Martin Egholm Nielsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >>And you can't shade windows that have no decor.
> >i'm not so shure if i understand right.
> I don't think you understand - the shading Matt refers to is
> the BB shading
yes i understand now ;)
> Btw.: Cool wallpaper, can you
Hi,
>>And you can't shade windows that have no decor.
> i'm not so shure if i understand right.
> Take a look at this:
> http://hermes.rz.hs-bremen.de/~renegat/screen001.png (499k)
> http://hermes.rz.hs-bremen.de/~renegat/screen001.jpg (143k)
I don't think you understand - the shading Matt refe
On Friday 24 May 2002 12:05, Bertrand Duret wrote:
> On Thursday 23 May 2002 16:51, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > A user has reported that nautilus 1.0.6 that came with Mandrake will not
> > focus under the current alpha series.
> >
> > Can anyone verify this?
>
> I have Mandrake 8.1 and it's nau
On Thursday 23 May 2002 16:51, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> A user has reported that nautilus 1.0.6 that came with Mandrake will not
> focus under the current alpha series.
>
> Can anyone verify this?
I have Mandrake 8.1 and it's nautilus 1.0.4 which is provided. I suppose that
nautilus 1.0.6 com
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 09:31:30 +, Martin Egholm Nielsen wrote:
> >>>use bblaunch with the -d option:
> >>>$ bblaunch -d none aterm -tr +sb etc.
> >>>not sure where you'd find bblaunch if you don't have it, but I think
> >>>it's floating round somewhere...
> >>there is also bbappconf
>
Hi,
* Matt Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> And you can't shade windows that have no decor.
>
i'm not so shure if i understand right.
Take a look at this:
http://hermes.rz.hs-bremen.de/~renegat/screen001.png (499k)
http://hermes.rz.hs-bremen.de/~renegat/screen001.jpg (143k)
regards
sas
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 13:15, John L. Clark wrote:
> Ok, I was browsing through the blackbox screenshots when I stumbled
> across the ones posted by Derek Cunningham
> http://www2.skynet.ca/~mindhaze/screenshots/>. It prompted me to
> give aterm a shot, and lo-and-behold, it's a pretty terminal.
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 19:04, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> so all seems well. I cranked the border width up to 7 and played around for a
> while.
Confirmed, all is well. You are truly a legend, in fact you can have the
rest of the day off if you want ;).
> P.S. your style is not half bad.
Thank
Derek Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Sean,
>
> Since you're the package maintainer for blackbox, you should make life easy
> for lazy debian users (and users that don't want to compile things) by
> having a blackbox-alpha package. It'd be real nice to just apt-get update ;
> apt-get
Hi there,
>>>use bblaunch with the -d option:
>>>$ bblaunch -d none aterm -tr +sb etc.
>>>not sure where you'd find bblaunch if you don't have it, but I think
>>>it's floating round somewhere...
>>there is also bbappconf
> I use a combination of bbappconf, and bblaunch. I find bbappconf a
On Thu, May23,02 19:36, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> >
> > use bblaunch with the -d option:
> >
> > $ bblaunch -d none aterm -tr +sb etc.
> >
> > not sure where you'd find bblaunch if you don't have it, but I think
> > it's floating round somewhere...
> >
> > Matt
>
> there is also bbappcon
61 matches
Mail list logo
