On Fri, 08 Feb 2002, Derek Cunningham wrote:
> IMO, blackbox, coupled with a couple transparent decorless aterms (75%
> shading, to differenciate them from the bg) is all the eye-candy I need!
What about good fonts?
Greetings, Mark
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 11:53:00AM -0500, Derek Cunningham wrote:
> I know there was some issues with setting the bg with something other than
> Esetroot, but what's wrong with just using Esetroot?
Because being able to use Esetroot usually means that you have Eterm lying
around somewhere, since
On Fri, Feb08,02 12:34, Jeff Taylor wrote:
> I don't know if you have just slashdotted the site, but those are some
> awesome images. I'm gonna grab me one or two.
>
nah... someone else slashdotted the site earlier. :) bastards... I'll wait a
day or so, then get some images. :)
DC
> Quoting D
I don't know if you have just slashdotted the site, but those are some
awesome images. I'm gonna grab me one or two.
Jeffrey
Quoting Derek Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[snip]
> But with http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/BlueMarble/ why would one
> not want to use a jpg?! :)
>
> DC
>
On Fri, Feb08,02 11:03, Anh Lai wrote:
> Eterm could not use transparent mode with bsetbg generated backgrouds:
> e.g: bsetbg -mod 4 4 -bg rgb:46/46/46 -fg rgb:53/53/53
> only aterm could use this.
>
> but Eterm would work if you just use bsetbg to point to a jpg.
>
> now Eterm transparent mode
... On 02/08/02, Derek Cunningham decided to write ...
> On Fri, Feb08,02 10:36, Anh Lai wrote:
> > > IMO, blackbox, coupled with a couple transparent decorless aterms (75%
> > > shading, to differenciate them from the bg) is all the eye-candy I need!
> >
> > And now i can choose to use Eterm tr
On Fri, Feb08,02 10:36, Anh Lai wrote:
> > IMO, blackbox, coupled with a couple transparent decorless aterms (75%
> > shading, to differenciate them from the bg) is all the eye-candy I need!
>
> And now i can choose to use Eterm transparency with the patch in cvs. ..
> .tis nice.
>
OK... I must
On Fri, Feb08,02 09:13, dan radom wrote:
> amen! i can't imagine a file manager that could ever be better then $SHELL. i
>guess eye candy means different things to different people, but to me blackbox is all
>eye candy and pure X bliss...
>
IMO, blackbox, coupled with a couple transparent de
amen! i can't imagine a file manager that could ever be better then $SHELL. i guess
eye candy means different things to different people, but to me blackbox is all eye
candy and pure X bliss...
* Jeff Taylor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I run at 1280x1024 (17" LCD) and still use BB for the ex
In message: Re: [BlackBox] I know I'm not supposed to like eyecandy, but...
(<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
on 08/02/2002 (Fri 09:36) Jeff Taylor wrote:
> I run at 1280x1024 (17" LCD) and still use BB for the extra room. Of
> course, I ran BB on a Sun 21" display because of
I run at 1280x1024 (17" LCD) and still use BB for the extra room. Of
course, I ran BB on a Sun 21" display because of the room. I've tried
3-4 Desktop Environments and have concluded I just don't like them.
I'd rather type "rm file" in a terminal window than drag a file icon
in a file manager to
> (like fvwm or twm), then BlackBox is a very beautiful alternative. In
> fact, in a lot of ways, I prefer BlackBox because of its simplicity.
> There is little to distract you.
>
that is exactly what I like about blackbox. I often use it on a 800x600
display. There is still room.
w I'm not supposed to like eyecandy, but...
Imad Hussain wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Alright, I know BlackBox isn't about frills and such, and I do agree
with
>that philosophy. However, recently I've been enticed by the dark side
-- KDE.
>
>I'm sure I could be saved
Imad Hussain wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Alright, I know BlackBox isn't about frills and such, and I do agree with
>that philosophy. However, recently I've been enticed by the dark side -- KDE.
>
>I'm sure I could be saved if I could find I way to modify the window
>decorations to be similiar to the oh-so-
On 08-Feb-2002 Imad Hussain wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Alright, I know BlackBox isn't about frills and such, and I do agree with
> that philosophy. However, recently I've been enticed by the dark side -- KDE.
>
> I'm sure I could be saved if I could find I way to modify the window
> decorations to be si
Hi!
Alright, I know BlackBox isn't about frills and such, and I do agree with
that philosophy. However, recently I've been enticed by the dark side -- KDE.
I'm sure I could be saved if I could find I way to modify the window
decorations to be similiar to the oh-so-good KDE "Web" borders. You
16 matches
Mail list logo
