Archaic wrote:
Would there be any objections to creating a symlink or wrapper script
named spell that points to ispell? I don't know if the same would work
for aspell. Either that, or both LFS and BLFS could edit
/usr/share/vim/vim63/tools/vimspell.sh.
I haven't investigated this yet. I just
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
Currently for testing unzip, the book includes the following commands:
/sbin/ldconfig $PWD make check
This is wrong. We are modifying the linker cache to include libraries
in unzip's build dir.
I propose to change the instructions to the following:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
I propose to change the instructions to the following:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$PWD make check
That is probably the right thing, but.
Why are we building libunzip.so at all? Nothing uses it AFAIK, and we
need the -dont_make-noise patch
On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 23:59 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
Hi:
I would like to propose that we add libpci.a during the installation
of pciutils. The following commands would accompolish that:
install -d /usr/include/pci
install -m 644 lib/libpci.a /usr/lib
David Jensen wrote:
The whole thing seems too complex, this seems all that is required for
static.
sed -i 's:^LN = ln: -sf:' unix/Makefile
make prefix=/usr LOCAL_UNZIP=-DUSE_UNSHRINK \
linux -funix/Makefile
make prefix=/usr LOCAL_UNZIP=-DUSE_UNSHRINK install
The sed
Original Message
Subject: Berkeley DB
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 19:02:22 -0500
From: Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David,
Did you add the test instructions to the Berkeley DB section? If so,
it must have been while I was on vacation.
In
Original Message
Subject: Re: Berkeley DB
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 19:35:24 -0500
From: David Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
David,
Did you add the test instructions to the Berkeley DB section? If
Original Message
Subject: Re: Berkeley DB
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 19:57:21 -0500
From: Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Jensen wrote:
It always *best guesses* 1 hour! 4 processes is
Original Message
Subject: Re: Berkeley DB
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 20:40:42 -0500
From: Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Jensen wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: Berkeley DB
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 21:46:46 -0500
From: David Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I've
Original Message
Subject: Re: Berkeley DB
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:00:08 -0500
From: Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
David
Original Message
Subject: Re: Berkeley DB
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 22:00:01 -0500
From: David Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: Berkeley DB
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 12:29:11 -0500
From: Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
Original Message
Subject: Re: Berkeley DB
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 07:25:32 -0500
From: David Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bruce Dubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
$cat
Now that LFS 6.1 has been released, we need to develop a strategy for
the release of BLFS 6.1. Right now there are 52 outstanding bugs.
http://tinyurl.com/ayu3x
Of these, several are reasonably old:
Opened prior 2005: 7
Opened in
Jan: 4
Feb: 5
Mar: 2
Apr: 5
May: 19
Jun: 7
Jul: 3
Many of the
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Now that LFS 6.1 has been released, we need to develop a strategy for
the release of BLFS 6.1. Right now there are 52 outstanding bugs.
http://tinyurl.com/ayu3x
Of these, several are reasonably old:
Opened prior 2005: 7
Opened in
Jan: 4
Feb: 5
Mar: 2
Apr: 5
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Now that LFS 6.1 has been released, we need to develop a strategy for
the release of BLFS 6.1. Right now there are 52 outstanding bugs.
Now 50.
http://tinyurl.com/ayu3x
1. What bugs should we target (or not) for BLFS 6.1?
2. What should be the target release date?
17 matches
Mail list logo
