Re: Move package management to LFS

2006-01-25 Thread Matthew Burgess
Bruce Dubbs wrote: Matthew Burgess wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Go ahead and put into LFS whatever you think is appropriate and we'll "do the right thing" afterward. OK, this is now in LFS as of r7301. I think you need to review the text: I already did...honest :-) "Package Management

Re: Anduin files

2006-01-25 Thread Randy McMurchy
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 01/25/06 14:51 CST: > Is there any reason why you had to pull out the .../files/BLFS > area. There were production files in there and now the book is broken. Sorry for the noise. I am mistaken. If I could type, this wouldn't have been necessary. -- Randy rml

Anduin files

2006-01-25 Thread Randy McMurchy
Hi all, This is directed to everyone who has write access to the /srv/www area on Anduin. Is there any reason why you had to pull out the .../files/BLFS area. There were production files in there and now the book is broken. Isn't this something that could have been discussed first? -- Randy r

Re: Firefox SVG

2006-01-25 Thread Andrew Benton
Bruce Dubbs wrote: According to what I read, most FF binaries come with svg built in. I now think that it would be expected by most users and should be the default. +1 Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe:

Re: Firefox SVG

2006-01-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Randy McMurchy wrote: > I don't mean this to be rude or condescending to you specifically, > Bruce, but I just felt that most would heed the note to review the > file and enable it if they wanted it. Just out of curiosity, did you > not want it when you initially built Firefox? Nah. You aren't b

Re: Tool to generate BLFS dependency graph

2006-01-25 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 1/25/06, Richard A Downing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just for today: > > http://www.langside.org.uk/images/blfs.svg Wow, that's insane. Thanks, Richard. Consider it downloaded. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.

Re: Firefox SVG

2006-01-25 Thread Richard A Downing
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:34:41 + Richard A Downing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:24:57 -0600 > Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > When I tried to look at Nico's svg file of dependencies, I found I > > didn't have an svg viewer. There is one built into firefox, b

Re: Tool to generate BLFS dependency graph

2006-01-25 Thread Richard A Downing
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:35:13 -0800 Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/25/06, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nico R. wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > > > I wrote a small program that allows you to get a graphical > > > representation of the BLFS dependencies. (In fact, that's wh

Re: Tool to generate BLFS dependency graph

2006-01-25 Thread Richard A Downing
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:27:11 +0100 "Nico R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wrote a small program that allows you to get a graphical > representation of the BLFS dependencies. Awesome! Thanks Nico. R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.or

Re: Firefox SVG

2006-01-25 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 1/25/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Additionally, the librsvg library (BLFS Chapter 9) includes a > stand-alone tool for viewing SVG files, and can optionally create > an SVG plugin for Moz/Firefox. I'm not sure how good the plugin > works, though. I've never tried it. I've h

Re: Firefox SVG

2006-01-25 Thread Richard A Downing
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:24:57 -0600 Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I tried to look at Nico's svg file of dependencies, I found I > didn't have an svg viewer. There is one built into firefox, but we > don't enable it by default. Is there a reason why? > > I would *recommend* :) th

Re: Firefox SVG

2006-01-25 Thread Randy McMurchy
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 01/25/06 12:30 CST: > Not exactly. You left --enable-canvas on by default and that's not standard. I thought of that after I had already sent the email. I was hoping nobody would notice. :-) However, as was discussed in the extensive discussion Jeremy referred

Re: Tool to generate BLFS dependency graph

2006-01-25 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 1/25/06, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nico R. wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I wrote a small program that allows you to get a graphical > > representation of the BLFS dependencies. (In fact, that's why I asked > > how I could produce a working huge flattened XML file containing the > > BL

Re: Firefox SVG

2006-01-25 Thread Randy McMurchy
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 01/25/06 12:24 CST: > Bruce, another option is to use xsvg that's in the cairo snapshots directory: > > http://cairographics.org/snapshots/ > > It may depend on libsvg and/or libsvg-cairo, but I don't remember. Additionally, the librsvg library (BLFS Chapter 9

Re: Firefox SVG

2006-01-25 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 1/25/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 01/25/06 11:24 CST: > > When I tried to look at Nico's svg file of dependencies, I found I > > didn't have an svg viewer. There is one built into firefox, but we > > don't enable it by default. Is there a rea

Re: Firefox SVG

2006-01-25 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 1/25/06, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I tried to look at Nico's svg file of dependencies, I found I > didn't have an svg viewer. There is one built into firefox, but we > don't enable it by default. Is there a reason why? Bruce, another option is to use xsvg that's in the cai

Re: Firefox SVG

2006-01-25 Thread Randy McMurchy
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 01/25/06 11:24 CST: > When I tried to look at Nico's svg file of dependencies, I found I > didn't have an svg viewer. There is one built into firefox, but we > don't enable it by default. Is there a reason why? > > I would *recommend* :) that we change this. It

Re: Tool to generate BLFS dependency graph

2006-01-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Nico R. wrote: > Hello! > > I wrote a small program that allows you to get a graphical > representation of the BLFS dependencies. (In fact, that's why I asked > how I could produce a working huge flattened XML file containing the > BLFS book; thanks to Manuel for the help.) Wow. That's some char

Re: iso-codes requirement

2006-01-25 Thread Randy McMurchy
Jay D. McHugh wrote these words on 01/25/06 10:49 CST: > ISO Codes doesn't list Python as being a requirement (optional or > required) but when I tried to install it without first installing > Python, this is what happened (it worked fine once I installed Python): My bad. :-( This version removed

Re: iso-codes requirement

2006-01-25 Thread Chris Staub
Jay D. McHugh wrote: ISO Codes doesn't list Python as being a requirement (optional or required) but when I tried to install it without first installing Python, this is what happened (it worked fine once I installed Python): Looks like it. From the Changelog: * Now depend on python. Closes: #25

iso-codes requirement

2006-01-25 Thread Jay D. McHugh
ISO Codes doesn't list Python as being a requirement (optional or required) but when I tried to install it without first installing Python, this is what happened (it worked fine once I installed Python): [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/iso-codes-0.49$ ./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr && make configure.ac:

Tool to generate BLFS dependency graph

2006-01-25 Thread Nico R.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hello! I wrote a small program that allows you to get a graphical representation of the BLFS dependencies. (In fact, that's why I asked how I could produce a working huge flattened XML file containing the BLFS book; thanks to Manuel for the help.

Re: BLFS-XML: internal subsets and XIncludes

2006-01-25 Thread Nico R.
M.Canales.es wrote: [...] > To fix this bug all entities found in Xincluded files must be replaced by > their values in the output, and that, for the BLFS sources, is equivalent to > tell to xmllint that must to replace all entities in the output using: > > $ xmllint --nonet --xinclude --noent