Looking at iced tea web, it looks like xulrunner is a required dependency.
It's
looking for mozilla-plugin.pc. When I search the web, it looks like that's the
only thing that installs it. Not sure though.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.l
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Andrew Benton wrote:
>
>> I'm reasonably confident that if I spent some time hacking at it I
>> could get Llvm to compile with Clang and without the static libs.
>> However, I lack the motivation to do it. To me, Llvm is a required dep
>> of Mesa. I install Llvm, Mesa is happy
Andrew Benton wrote:
> I'm reasonably confident that if I spent some time hacking at it I
> could get Llvm to compile with Clang and without the static libs.
> However, I lack the motivation to do it. To me, Llvm is a required dep
> of Mesa. I install Llvm, Mesa is happy, I move on, end of. Do we
On Fri, 11 May 2012 23:11:53 +0100
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I've been looking at adding clang to llvm. If I just try to use the current
> instructions that remove the static libraries, the build fails after about
> half
> an hour:
>
> llvm[4]: Linking Release executable clang (without symbols)
>
On Fri, 11 May 2012 23:36:53 +0100
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:43:18PM +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> > >
> > Confirmed: no need for the sed if cairo is built first and then g-i.
> > Librsvg compiles OK.
> >
> > Pierre
>
> Thanks for testing this! Anyone object to recomme
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:43:18PM +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> >
> > Couldn't it be that building g-i before cairo or g-i after cairo does
> > not generate exactly the same configuration?
> >
> > Since I use some automation, and g-i is marked optional (required to
> > build gnome), which is har
I've been looking at adding clang to llvm. If I just try to use the current
instructions that remove the static libraries, the build fails after about half
an hour:
llvm[4]: Linking Release executable clang (without symbols)
g++: error: clangSerialization.a: No such file or directory
g++: error
Le 09/05/2012 22:54, Pierre Labastie a écrit :
> Le 07/05/2012 18:00, Ken Moffat a écrit :
>> In my case I build dbus, cairo, gtk-doc, dbus-glib, ...,
>> gobject-introspection in that order, followed by pango, atk,
>> shared-mime-info, cups, gdk-pixbuf, gtk2, gtk3. I don't imagine that
>> variation
Le 11/05/2012 18:43, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> On 11-05-2012 12:23, Armin K. wrote:
>>> On 05/11/2012 12:47 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>>
>>> These can be removed if no one uses them
>>>
iced-tea-web
avifile
>> I use icedtea, just waiting for the new version.
> i
a...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
> Author: andy
> Date: 2012-05-11 12:58:04 -0600 (Fri, 11 May 2012)
> New Revision: 10176
>
> Modified:
>trunk/BOOK/general.ent
>trunk/BOOK/multimedia/videoutils/videoutils.xml
> Log:
> removing avifile
Yes. I was just looking at it and it doesn't build.
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> On 11-05-2012 12:23, Armin K. wrote:
>> On 05/11/2012 12:47 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>> These can be removed if no one uses them
>>
>>> iced-tea-web
>>> avifile
> I use icedtea, just waiting for the new version.
iced-tea-web is not IcedTea, but is dependent on IcedTe
On 11-05-2012 12:23, Armin K. wrote:
> On 05/11/2012 12:47 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> These can be removed if no one uses them
>
>> iced-tea-web
>> avifile
I use icedtea, just waiting for the new version.
--
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.l
On 05/11/2012 12:47 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
These can be removed if no one uses them
> iced-tea-web
> avifile
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 05/11/2012 12:47 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> You guys are doing fantastic!
>
> Here's the current outstanding list.
>
...
> mod_dnssl krejzi
> lib-usbcompat krejzi
> libdaemon krejzi
> unixODBC krejzi
> nano krejzi
Done.
> enchantkrejzi
> lzokrejzi
14 matches
Mail list logo