On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 04:22:36AM +0200, Armin K. wrote:
>>
>> Now with this, since I don't know to be part of the team, I want to resign.
>>
>
> I find the way he was encouraged to quit highly demotivating.
> Maybe it works for employees in s
Em 25-08-2013 16:50, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
...
>> sed -i 's/jars,test-jar/jars/' build.xml
>> env LC_ALL=C ./build.sh -Ddist.dir=/opt/ant-1.9.x dist
>>
>> BTW, very good this sed!!!
>
> It's in the book.
I know, but with this problem, running again and again, I cou
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Thanks, Bruce! This does not solve the problem, but is really a
> progress, at last:
> root [ /home/fernando/tmp ]# cat hello.java
> public class hello
> {
> public static void main(String[] args)
> {
> System.out.println("Hello, World");
>
Em 25-08-2013 16:03, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> source /etc/profile
> export CLASSPATH=.:/usr/share/java && export
> PATH="$PATH:/opt/openjdk-bin/bin" && export JAVA_HOME="/opt/openjdk-bi/bin"
> which javac
> env LC_ALL=C ./build.sh -Ddist.dir=/opt/ant-1.9.2 dist
>
>
> # which javac
> /opt/openjdk-
source /etc/profile
export CLASSPATH=.:/usr/share/java && export
PATH="$PATH:/opt/openjdk-bin/bin" && export JAVA_HOME="/opt/openjdk-bi/bin"
which javac
env LC_ALL=C ./build.sh -Ddist.dir=/opt/ant-1.9.2 dist
# which javac
/opt/openjdk-bin/bin/javac
... Bootstrapping Ant Distribution
... Compili
Forgot the log
--
[]s,
Fernando
source /etc/profile
export CLASSPATH=.:/usr/share/java && export PATH="$PATH:/opt/openjdk-bin/bin" && export JAVA_HOME="/opt/openjdk-bi/bin"
which javac
env LC_ALL=C ./build.sh -Ddist.dir=/opt/ant-1.9.2 dist
# which javac
/opt/openjdk-bin/bin/javac
... Bootstr
Em 25-08-2013 14:02, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> Bruce, I am having trouble with this. Arch is i686. Log attached (big
>> lines, pasting here would break)
>>
>> Perhaps I am not setting the appropriate envvars?
>>
>> Have tried with two different OJDK binaries, with the p
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Bruce, I am having trouble with this. Arch is i686. Log attached (big
> lines, pasting here would break)
>
> Perhaps I am not setting the appropriate envvars?
>
> Have tried with two different OJDK binaries, with the proprietary jdk.
> About the envvars, I am inclined
>On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 04:52:57 -0500
>Rob Landley wrote:
> What I don't currently have is a way to parse the docbook and
> generate automated builds from that. I'm currently doing it by hand.
> If the instructions are regular enough that a machine can be
> programmed to follow them, it would proba
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Bruce, I am having trouble with this. Arch is i686. Log attached (big
> lines, pasting here would break)
>
> Perhaps I am not setting the appropriate envvars?
>
> Have tried with two different OJDK binaries, with the proprietary jdk.
> About the envvars, I am inclined
Bruce, I am having trouble with this. Arch is i686. Log attached (big
lines, pasting here would break)
Perhaps I am not setting the appropriate envvars?
Have tried with two different OJDK binaries, with the proprietary jdk.
About the envvars, I am inclined to think they are not the problem, as
IS
Le 25/08/2013 17:16, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> Rob Landley wrote:
>
>> So if there's a vacuum, I note that I'm finally updating my old
>> automated LFS 6.8 build to 7.4-rc1, and once I've got that I'd like to
>> automate the corresponding BLFS release. (I automated 80 or so BLFS
>> packages before,
Rob Landley wrote:
> So if there's a vacuum, I note that I'm finally updating my old
> automated LFS 6.8 build to 7.4-rc1, and once I've got that I'd like to
> automate the corresponding BLFS release. (I automated 80 or so BLFS
> packages before, but that was for an employer and got left behind wh
David Brodie wrote:
> On 23/08/13 02:56, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I am trying to update lvm2 and am running into a bit of trouble with the
>> tests. The configure and make complete with out issue. I did a make
>> install to a DESTDIR and that was OK too.
>>
>> The problem is 'make check'. If I run
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 03:24:12PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 04:52:57AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> >
> > Is there anything currently available along these lines before I go
> > reinvent the wheel?
> >
> People have tried using jhalfs. The problem with BLFS packages i
23 21:22:36 2013),<1377424377.2737.123@driftwood>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
>=0A=
> The potential advantage of this for BLFS is regression testing: you can=
=0A=
> plug in a new package and see what effect
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 04:52:57AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
>
> What I don't currently have is a way to parse the docbook and generate
> automated builds from that. I'm currently doing it by hand. If the
> instructions are regular enough that a machine can be programmed to
> follow them, it
On 08/23/2013 09:22:36 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> On 08/24/2013 03:33 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > Armin K. wrote:
> Please, remove my accounts from anduin, higgs and quantum servers as
> well from LFS and BLFS trac (both Krejzi), or if remove isn't
> possible,
> remove my privileges.
>
> I am serious,
On 23/08/13 02:56, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I am trying to update lvm2 and am running into a bit of trouble with the
> tests. The configure and make complete with out issue. I did a make
> install to a DESTDIR and that was OK too.
>
> The problem is 'make check'. If I run as a normal user, all the t
19 matches
Mail list logo