Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 06:00:51PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 05:19:22PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
However there is a method to their madness and
LFSers should be able to pick it up relatively quickly.
>>>Do
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 06:00:51PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 05:19:22PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> However there is a method to their madness and
> >> LFSers should be able to pick it up relatively quickly.
> >>
> > Don't get me started on w
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 05:19:22PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>
>> Really, the only thing that's different through the end of Chapter 6 is
>> adding new packages. Skipping systemd and adding eudev is all that is
>> needed to do a straight traditional build
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 05:19:22PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> Really, the only thing that's different through the end of Chapter 6 is
> adding new packages. Skipping systemd and adding eudev is all that is
> needed to do a straight traditional build (with a few packages f
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 03:19:45PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> My point was that _many_ people who build
> LFS-svn will either copy and paste, or will already have their own
> scripts. As you said (paraphrasing), this is a major change - those
> of us with our own scripts will
Em 20-04-2014 18:26, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 03:19:45PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> BLFS Trac wrote:
>> My objective is to allow users that do not want to consider or even try
>> systemd to continue to do what they are already doing.
>>
>
> And you appear to be achieving
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 03:19:45PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> BLFS Trac wrote:
>
> > Comment (by ken@…):
>
> > At the moment I'm still trying to absorb the systemd changes in LFS - my
> > own scripts now build a working LFS with eudev and _current_ LFS
> > bootscripts, and I'm fairly confi
BLFS Trac wrote:
> Comment (by ken@…):
> At the moment I'm still trying to absorb the systemd changes in LFS - my
> own scripts now build a working LFS with eudev and _current_ LFS
> bootscripts, and I'm fairly confident that the systemv-on-systemd build
> will work when I test it. But I
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> TheOldFellow wrote:
>
>> I trust BLFS will still be usable for non-systemd (i.e. sane)
>> systems,
>
> Yes, that's the intent.
>
>-- Bruce
>
Whoopeedo!
and Hi Bruce!
Richard.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/
TheOldFellow wrote:
> I trust BLFS will still be usable for non-systemd (i.e. sane)
> systems,
Yes, that's the intent.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
bdu...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
> Missing OpenJDK-1.7.0.55-i686-bin.tar.xz
> Missing OpenJDK-1.7.0.55-x86_64-bin.tar.xz
These tarballs are really large. Have the binaries in them been stripped?
> Missing nmap-6.46.tar.bz2
Book md5sum e8c337456a692bada3ee53e7f5b87bac
DL md5sum 5a36ad3a63d5
Armin K. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Right after LFS/BLFS 7.5 releases I started doing some work to make a
> standalone BLFS systemd incorporating my notes into BLFS 7.5 book. I
> stopped doing it after I found out that LFS itself is getting systemd.
>
> Here is some of my work in form of patches in hope
Hello,
Right after LFS/BLFS 7.5 releases I started doing some work to make a
standalone BLFS systemd incorporating my notes into BLFS 7.5 book. I
stopped doing it after I found out that LFS itself is getting systemd.
Here is some of my work in form of patches in hope someone might find it
useful
13 matches
Mail list logo
