On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 10:20:51PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:50:14PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:33:30AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> > > On 1/5/21 9:34 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> > > > On Tue, J
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 05:29:53PM -0600, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> On 1/5/21 4:20 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:50:14PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:33:30AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> > > > O
On 1/5/21 4:20 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:50:14PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:33:30AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 1/5/21 9:34 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 02:33:35PM +0100, Pier
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:50:14PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:33:30AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> > On 1/5/21 9:34 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 02:33:35PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
> > > wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:33:30AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 1/5/21 9:34 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 02:33:35PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 18:21 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> > > > Hi Guy
On 1/5/21 9:34 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 02:33:35PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 18:21 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
Hi Guys,
some of you may have noticed that I have an aversion to gtk-doc (I'm
getting over it). Thi
On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 14:33 +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 18:21 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > some of you may have noticed that I have an aversion to gtk-doc
> > (I'm
> > getting over it). This was triggered by occasional uses of
>
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 02:33:35PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 18:21 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > some of you may have noticed that I have an aversion to gtk-doc (I'm
> > getting over it). This was triggered by occasional uses o
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 18:21 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> some of you may have noticed that I have an aversion to gtk-doc (I'm
> getting over it). This was triggered by occasional uses of
> autoreconf now needing gtkdocize. That first hit me in polkit with
> the patch for
On 12/30/20 3:55 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 03:46:58PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
On 12/30/20 1:18 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
I think you can start gnome without a dm, by putting "exec gnome-
session" in .xinitrc. Now how to only start g
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 03:46:58PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote:
> On 12/30/20 1:18 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
>
> > I think you can start gnome without a dm, by putting "exec gnome-
> > session" in .xinitrc. Now how to only start gnome-shell, I am not sure.
>
> This is what
On 12/30/20 1:18 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
I think you can start gnome without a dm, by putting "exec gnome-
session" in .xinitrc. Now how to only start gnome-shell, I am not sure.
This is what I use:
$ cat .xinitrc
session=${2:-xfce}
dbus="dbus-launch --exit-with-session"
ck=
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 08:18:16PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 18:21 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > some of you may have noticed that I have an aversion to gtk-doc (I'm
> > getting over it). This was triggered by occasional uses o
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 18:21 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> some of you may have noticed that I have an aversion to gtk-doc (I'm
> getting over it). This was triggered by occasional uses of
> autoreconf now needing gtkdocize. That first hit me in polkit with
> the patch for
Hi Guys,
some of you may have noticed that I have an aversion to gtk-doc (I'm
getting over it). This was triggered by occasional uses of
autoreconf now needing gtkdocize. That first hit me in polkit with
the patch for elogind, but my memory suggested that the patch has in
the past been added or
15 matches
Mail list logo
