Re: [blfs-dev] Why do we patch polkit for elogind ?

2021-01-05 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 10:20:51PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:50:14PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:33:30AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > > On 1/5/21 9:34 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > On Tue, J

Re: [blfs-dev] Why do we patch polkit for elogind ?

2021-01-05 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 05:29:53PM -0600, Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev wrote: > > On 1/5/21 4:20 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:50:14PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:33:30AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > O

Re: [blfs-dev] Why do we patch polkit for elogind ?

2021-01-05 Thread Douglas R. Reno via blfs-dev
On 1/5/21 4:20 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:50:14PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:33:30AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: On 1/5/21 9:34 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 02:33:35PM +0100, Pier

Re: [blfs-dev] Why do we patch polkit for elogind ?

2021-01-05 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:50:14PM +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:33:30AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > On 1/5/21 9:34 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 02:33:35PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev > > > wrote: > > >

Re: [blfs-dev] Why do we patch polkit for elogind ?

2021-01-05 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 11:33:30AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > On 1/5/21 9:34 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 02:33:35PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev > > wrote: > > > On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 18:21 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > Hi Guy

Re: [blfs-dev] Why do we patch polkit for elogind ?

2021-01-05 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
On 1/5/21 9:34 AM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 02:33:35PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 18:21 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: Hi Guys, some of you may have noticed that I have an aversion to gtk-doc (I'm getting over it).  Thi

Re: [blfs-dev] Why do we patch polkit for elogind ?

2021-01-05 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 14:33 +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: > On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 18:21 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > > > some of you may have noticed that I have an aversion to gtk-doc > > (I'm > > getting over it).  This was triggered by occasional uses of >

Re: [blfs-dev] Why do we patch polkit for elogind ?

2021-01-05 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 02:33:35PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: > On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 18:21 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > > > some of you may have noticed that I have an aversion to gtk-doc (I'm > > getting over it).  This was triggered by occasional uses o

Re: [blfs-dev] Why do we patch polkit for elogind ?

2021-01-05 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 18:21 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > Hi Guys, > > some of you may have noticed that I have an aversion to gtk-doc (I'm > getting over it).  This was triggered by occasional uses of > autoreconf now needing gtkdocize.  That first hit me in polkit with > the patch for

Re: [blfs-dev] Why do we patch polkit for elogind ?

2020-12-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
On 12/30/20 3:55 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 03:46:58PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: On 12/30/20 1:18 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: I think you can start gnome without a dm, by putting "exec gnome- session" in .xinitrc. Now how to only start g

Re: [blfs-dev] Why do we patch polkit for elogind ?

2020-12-30 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 03:46:58PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > On 12/30/20 1:18 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: > > > I think you can start gnome without a dm, by putting "exec gnome- > > session" in .xinitrc. Now how to only start gnome-shell, I am not sure. > > This is what

Re: [blfs-dev] Why do we patch polkit for elogind ?

2020-12-30 Thread Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev
On 12/30/20 1:18 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: I think you can start gnome without a dm, by putting "exec gnome- session" in .xinitrc. Now how to only start gnome-shell, I am not sure. This is what I use: $ cat .xinitrc session=${2:-xfce} dbus="dbus-launch --exit-with-session" ck=

Re: [blfs-dev] Why do we patch polkit for elogind ?

2020-12-30 Thread Ken Moffat via blfs-dev
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 08:18:16PM +0100, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: > On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 18:21 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > > > some of you may have noticed that I have an aversion to gtk-doc (I'm > > getting over it).  This was triggered by occasional uses o

Re: [blfs-dev] Why do we patch polkit for elogind ?

2020-12-30 Thread Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 18:21 +, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > Hi Guys, > > some of you may have noticed that I have an aversion to gtk-doc (I'm > getting over it).  This was triggered by occasional uses of > autoreconf now needing gtkdocize.  That first hit me in polkit with > the patch for