Re: Re: Question

2005-09-03 Thread dag
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mail not delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This account is the target for 100+ spam each day, please contact me using alternative means. Original Message > I have corrected your document. > > +++ Attachment: No Virus found > +++ Bitdefender AntiVi

vsFTPD & local logins

2005-09-03 Thread David Ciecierski
Hello again, this time it's vsFTPD that's giving me hard time. I'm basically trying to set up a small home FTP server with anonymous access for uploads + rw access by a local user 'backup'. What I've done is I have chown root:ftp /home/ftp, mod 755, and chown backup:ftp /home/backup (mod 700).

Re: Missing Smiley Icons in gaim 1.5.0

2005-09-03 Thread Michael Kipper
Michael Kipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi, > > My gaim IM windows seem to be missing the smiley pulldowns. > And when I type a smiley, I don't get an actual icon, like I get in my > FC4 build of gaim. > Reply to my own post: It was my own stupid fault. For some c

version of blfs-bootscripts

2005-09-03 Thread Eric Qi
I downloaded blfs-bootscripts-20050509.tar.bz2 a few months ago, but BLFS-6.1 provides a blfs-bootscripts-20041227.tar.bz2, is it too old? or which one should I use when building BLFS-6.1? best whishes to everyone. Eric Qi -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http:

Re: sudden death of higher resolutions in LFS 6.0

2005-09-03 Thread Archaic
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:08:51AM +0200, Oneyed wrote: > Funny.. Exactly the same happened to me two days ago. I my xorg.conf > (xorg 6.8.2) there were three line: > > ### Uncomment if you don't want to default to DDC: > HorizSync30.0 - 95.0 > VertRefresh 50.0 - 160.0 > > .

Re: sudden death of higher resolutions in LFS 6.0

2005-09-03 Thread Oneyed
Funny.. Exactly the same happened to me two days ago. I my xorg.conf (xorg 6.8.2) there were three line: ### Uncomment if you don't want to default to DDC: HorizSync30.0 - 95.0 VertRefresh 50.0 - 160.0 ..well, and i just uncommented the HorizSync and the VertRefresh - and vo

Re: sudden death of higher resolutions in LFS 6.0

2005-09-03 Thread David Ciecierski
(as you can hopefully see below...) Oops, just realised I didn't turn the sig on for LFS server... fixed now. -- David Ciecierski Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/ma

Re: sudden death of higher resolutions in LFS 6.0

2005-09-03 Thread Archaic
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 12:47:57AM +0200, David Ciecierski wrote: > > Yes, just realised that (as you can hopefully see below...). Thanks all > the same! Looks good! :) -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfro

Re: sudden death of higher resolutions in LFS 6.0

2005-09-03 Thread David Ciecierski
However, it should be noted that signatures are to be separated with dash-dash-space "-- " and then a newline. Yes, just realised that (as you can hopefully see below...). Thanks all the same! -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blf

Re: sudden death of higher resolutions in LFS 6.0

2005-09-03 Thread Archaic
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 12:37:00AM +0200, David Ciecierski wrote: > > PS: Archaic, you may realise I've shamelessly copied your signature :-) > Hope you don't mind - I just think it's short, meaningful and quite > apropriate + may help spread the good news... Don't mind at all. However, it shou

Re: sudden death of higher resolutions in LFS 6.0

2005-09-03 Thread Randy McMurchy
David Ciecierski wrote these words on 09/03/05 17:37 CST: > PS: Archaic, you may realise I've shamelessly copied your signature :-) > Hope you don't mind - I just think it's short, meaningful and quite > apropriate + may help spread the good news... > - > Want control, education, and securit

Re: sudden death of higher resolutions in LFS 6.0

2005-09-03 Thread David Ciecierski
Any Ideas what could went wrong ? And most important, > how should I proceed ? Somehow I feel it should be config problem - the driver should not suddenly change the way it works, providing you did not rebuild it (which I assume you didn't do). Perhaps you could post your xfree.config so that

Re: sudden death of higher resolutions in LFS 6.0

2005-09-03 Thread Archaic
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 10:47:54PM +0200, Dr. Edgar Alwers wrote: > I was working until yesterday with my LFS/BLFS 6.0. I shut down the unit > after > a short skipe call and after downloading my e-mail. To my big surprise, this > morning I had only a 640x480 resolution, and no way to increase to

sudden death of higher resolutions in LFS 6.0

2005-09-03 Thread Dr. Edgar Alwers
I was working until yesterday with my LFS/BLFS 6.0. I shut down the unit after a short skipe call and after downloading my e-mail. To my big surprise, this morning I had only a 640x480 resolution, and no way to increase to the 1024x768 from yesterday. I tryed with XFree86 -configure, and put as

Re: Running a firstboot Script

2005-09-03 Thread Declan Moriarty
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words > Hi all, > > I need some advice from more experienced LFS'ers. > > Right now, I build my LFS systems (all two of them) by a customized > scripted build, which makes it easy to upgrade packages whenever a new > kernel, glibc, gcc, etc. comes out. >

Re: Multicard readers and xd-format

2005-09-03 Thread Declan Moriarty
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words > >Hi all, Sorry if this does not come in a proper format as I am >using a web interface. I have just been given a multiformat card >reader and while I can read sd format cards fine when I try and >mount an xd-graphics format card I g

Re: Multicard readers and xd-format

2005-09-03 Thread Simon Geard
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 00:01 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have just been given a multiformat card reader and while I can read > sd format cards fine when I try and mount an xd-graphics format card I > get a "media not found" message. Does anyone have any idea as to how I > can read these card

Re: gnome-2 libraries

2005-09-03 Thread Simon Geard
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 00:14 +, randhir phagura wrote: > Hi, > > Simon Geard wrote on: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 > > >That said, I'd be surprised if you could do anything useful > >with purely the GTK part - most programs targetted at Mono > >(e.g Tomboy, Blam, Beagle) will require the Gnome libraries