Re: wget 1.11.4

Carl Thorn wrote: > So is the response to wget the same? > yes still the same > Can you ping 66.135.59.49? > yes 31 packets transmitted 31 packets received 0% lost > reported after I terminated with ^C Just FYI, I find doing something like ping -c 2 66.135.59.49 to be a little easier. As

Re: wget 1.11.4

Andrew Benton wrote: > On 10/02/10 22:57, Carl Thorn wrote: >> I installed BIND and nslookup returned the value 66.135.59.49 >> >> /etc/resolv.conf >> # Generated by dhcpcd from eth0 >> # /etc/resolv.conf.head can replace this line >> nameserver 192.168.1.254 >> #/etc/resolv.conf.tail can replace t

Re: wget 1.11.4

On 10/02/10 22:57, Carl Thorn wrote: > I installed BIND and nslookup returned the value 66.135.59.49 > > /etc/resolv.conf > # Generated by dhcpcd from eth0 > # /etc/resolv.conf.head can replace this line > nameserver 192.168.1.254 > #/etc/resolv.conf.tail can replace this line > "/etc/resolv.conf"

Re: wget 1.11.4

Carl Thorn wrote: > I installed BIND and nslookup returned the value 66.135.59.49 > > /etc/resolv.conf > # Generated by dhcpcd from eth0 > # /etc/resolv.conf.head can replace this line > nameserver 192.168.1.254 > #/etc/resolv.conf.tail can replace this line > "/etc/resolv.conf" 4L, 149c > > Shou

Re: wget 1.11.4

I installed BIND and nslookup returned the value 66.135.59.49 /etc/resolv.conf # Generated by dhcpcd from eth0 # /etc/resolv.conf.head can replace this line nameserver 192.168.1.254 #/etc/resolv.conf.tail can replace this line "/etc/resolv.conf" 4L, 149c Should I mess with anything in the /etc/wg

Re: Thunderbird 3.0.1

Randy McMurchy wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 02/10/10 10:54 CST: > >> What does OO need it for? How does TB integrate with OO? >> > > Not sure about that one. > > > >> The only think I've ever thought that openLDAP was useful for was to >> consolidate credentials of multipl

Re: blfs-book-svn-html

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > stosss wrote: > >> I am not complaining. I am simply asking. > > Sometimes its hard to interpret words when they are only written. Yes, that is the problem with written communication. > My interpretation of your words was a complaint.  It may

Re: wget 1.11.4

Carl Thorn wrote: > Sorry about the second email address. It is really the same box I > didn't know that it would appear as thor...@yahoo.com. Any I tried > wget ftp://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/BLFS/svn/b/bc-1.06.tar.gz And > got the following error "Resolving anduin.linuxfromscratch.org > ...fai

Re: blfs-book-svn-html

stosss wrote: [putolin] >> Exactly and the 2010-02-09 and 2010-02-10 both have 20100203 at the >> top of the page. The last entry in the change log is February 3rd, >> 2010 according to this the book has not changed in seven days. Hence >> my original question. >> >> > > Also what is the poin

Re: wget 1.11.4

Sorry about the second email address. It is really the same box I didn't know that it would appear as thor...@yahoo.com. Any I tried wget ftp://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/BLFS/svn/b/bc-1.06.tar.gz And got the following error "Resolving anduin.linuxfromscratch.org ...failed. Temporary failure in

Re: blfs-book-svn-html

stosss wrote: > I am not complaining. I am simply asking. Sometimes its hard to interpret words when they are only written. My interpretation of your words was a complaint. It may not have been your intent. > volunteer project. I am not expecting you to do things as though you > have to. I a

Re: blfs-book-svn-html

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Johnneylee Rollins wrote: >> I am just pointing out the facts as can be found by searching the >> archives of any of the LFS mailing lists. I am not trying to be >> accusatory or rude. Your response is the typical response that can >> also by found in the same arch

Re: blfs-book-svn-html

> I am just pointing out the facts as can be found by searching the > archives of any of the LFS mailing lists. I am not trying to be > accusatory or rude. Your response is the typical response that can > also by found in the same archives to the challenges made by many. I'm glad it's typical to y

Re: blfs-book-svn-html

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Matthew Burgess wrote: > stosss wrote: > >> Why is it that you and other developers are so touchy about the book >> and its condition and people pointing out things that could be done >> different, better or whatever? Why do you and the others insist on >> thinking

Re: blfs-book-svn-html

>> Also what is the point of a nightly snapshot if the book has not changed? > Because it is set up as a cron job and I didn't go to the effort of > trying to figure out if any of the 300 or so pages changed. > > Most people will look at the document itself, especially the chang

Re: blfs-book-svn-html

stosss wrote: > Why is it that you and other developers are so touchy about the book > and its condition and people pointing out things that could be done > different, better or whatever? Why do you and the others insist on > thinking there is nothing wrong with the book and so unwilling to > impr

Re: blfs-book-svn-html

stosss wrote: > Why is it that you and other developers are so touchy about the book > and its condition and people pointing out things that could be done > different, better or whatever? Why do you and the others insist on > thinking there is nothing wrong with the book and so unwilling to > impr

Re: blfs-book-svn-html

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:35 PM, stosss wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> stosss wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: stosss wrote: > Also what is the point of a nightly snapshot if the book has not changed? Because it i

Re: blfs-book-svn-html

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > stosss wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> stosss wrote: >>> Also what is the point of a nightly snapshot if the book has not changed? >>> Because it is set up as a cron job and I didn't go to the effort of >

Re: blfs-book-svn-html

stosss wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> stosss wrote: >> >>> Also what is the point of a nightly snapshot if the book has not changed? >> Because it is set up as a cron job and I didn't go to the effort of >> trying to figure out if any of the 300 or so pages changed

Re: blfs-book-svn-html

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > stosss wrote: > >> Also what is the point of a nightly snapshot if the book has not changed? > > Because it is set up as a cron job and I didn't go to the effort of > trying to figure out if any of the 300 or so pages changed. > > Most people w

Re: blfs-book-svn-html

stosss wrote: > Also what is the point of a nightly snapshot if the book has not changed? Because it is set up as a cron job and I didn't go to the effort of trying to figure out if any of the 300 or so pages changed. Most people will look at the document itself, especially the change log, to

Re: Thunderbird 3.0.1

On 10/02/10 17:15, Or Goshen wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Andrew Benton > wrote: > > On 10/02/10 11:41, Or Goshen wrote: > > Hi > > > > I managed to compile Thunderbird 3.0.1 with the attached > .mozconfig file > > (basically a

Re: Thunderbird 3.0.1

>> > I managed to compile Thunderbird 3.0.1 with the attached .mozconfig file >> > (basically a slightly modified Firefox .mozconfig file) using the >> > following command to compile & install: "make -f client.mk >> > build && make -f client.mk >> > install" >>

Re: blfs-book-svn-html

> What is different between these two? > > blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-04 > blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-09 > > Both only show changes as of 02/03 and this is also at the top of the > page for both of them svn-20100203. I double checked to make sure I > had the right on

Re: blfs-book-svn-html

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > stosss wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Randy McMurchy >> wrote: >>> stosss wrote these words on 02/10/10 02:35 CST: What is different between these two? blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-04 blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-09

Re: blfs-book-svn-html

stosss wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Randy McMurchy > wrote: >> stosss wrote these words on 02/10/10 02:35 CST: >>> What is different between these two? >>> >>> blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-04 >>> blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-09 >>> >>> Both only show changes as of 02/03 and this is also a

Re: blfs-book-svn-html

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Randy McMurchy wrote: > stosss wrote these words on 02/10/10 02:35 CST: >> What is different between these two? >> >> blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-04 >> blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-09 >> >> Both only show changes as of 02/03 and this is also at the top of the >> page

Re: Thunderbird 3.0.1

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: > On 10/02/10 11:41, Or Goshen wrote: > > Hi > > > > I managed to compile Thunderbird 3.0.1 with the attached .mozconfig file > > (basically a slightly modified Firefox .mozconfig file) using the > > following command to compile & install: "ma

Re: Thunderbird 3.0.1

Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 02/10/10 10:54 CST: > What does OO need it for? How does TB integrate with OO? Not sure about that one. > The only think I've ever thought that openLDAP was useful for was to > consolidate credentials of multiple users on multiple systems. > > If there are oth

Re: Thunderbird 3.0.1

Actually I dont know, I'm just following ordes :-) The open office installation requires that Thunderbird be build with openLDAP support. On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Or Goshen wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs > wrote: > > > >> Or Goshen wrote: >

Re: Thunderbird 3.0.1

Or Goshen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> Or Goshen wrote: >> >>> ac_add_options --enable-ldap >>> >>> Got openLDAP installed too >> But what does it *do* for you? >> >> > openLDAP ? integration with open office (hopefully) What does OO need it for? How does TB

Re: Thunderbird 3.0.1

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Or Goshen wrote: > > > ac_add_options --enable-ldap > > > > Got openLDAP installed too > > But what does it *do* for you? > > openLDAP ? integration with open office (hopefully) -- Bruce > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/b

Re: Thunderbird 3.0.1

Or Goshen wrote: > ac_add_options --enable-ldap > > Got openLDAP installed too But what does it *do* for you? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Thunderbird 3.0.1

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: > On 10/02/10 11:41, Or Goshen wrote: > > Hi > > > > I managed to compile Thunderbird 3.0.1 with the attached .mozconfig file > > (basically a slightly modified Firefox .mozconfig file) using the > > following command to compile & install: "ma

Re: wget 1.11.4

Carl Thorn wrote: > Ok I registered, got my confirmation email and password so I am > submitting this a third time. This is the second time since I > registered. You are nost sending from your registered address. I added your 2nd address for you. > Would someone please help figure out how to f

Re: Some questions when building BLFS-dev(svn)

Dmitry Sokolov wrote: > Hello > > When i building some package, this package have a Recommended, Optional and > Required packages. > (Dependencies). > Can you answer me Yes or No or When on my questions. > > 1. Required packages needs to installed before current package?: I think, YES. > 2. Whe

wget 1.11.4

Ok I registered, got my confirmation email and password so I am submitting this a third time. This is the second time since I registered. Would someone please help figure out how to fix Wget now? Lynx works great so I know I have a working internet connection and network card. I recently comple

Re: Some questions when building BLFS-dev(svn)

- Original Message - From: "Andrew Benton" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 6:19 PM Subject: Re: Some questions when building BLFS-dev(svn) > On 10/02/10 11:18, Dmitry Sokolov wrote: >> Hello >> When i building some package, this package have a Recommended, Optional >> and Requi

Re: Some questions when building BLFS-dev(svn)

- Original Message - From: "Randy McMurchy" To: "BLFS Support List" Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 6:15 PM Subject: Re: Some questions when building BLFS-dev(svn) > Dmitry Sokolov wrote these words on 02/10/10 05:18 CST: >> When i building some package, this package have a Recomme

Re: Some questions when building BLFS-dev(svn)

On 10/02/10 11:18, Dmitry Sokolov wrote: > Hello > When i building some package, this package have a Recommended, Optional > and Required packages. > (Dependencies). > Can you answer me Yes or No or When on my questions. > 1. Required packages needs to installed before current package?: I > think,

Re: Some questions when building BLFS-dev(svn)

Dmitry Sokolov wrote these words on 02/10/10 05:18 CST: > When i building some package, this package have a Recommended, Optional and > Required packages. > (Dependencies). > Can you answer me Yes or No or When on my questions. > > 1. Required packages needs to installed before current package?:

Re: Thunderbird 3.0.1

On 10/02/10 11:41, Or Goshen wrote: > Hi > > I managed to compile Thunderbird 3.0.1 with the attached .mozconfig file > (basically a slightly modified Firefox .mozconfig file) using the > following command to compile & install: "make -f client.mk > build && make -f client.mk

Some questions when building BLFS-dev(svn)

Hello When i building some package, this package have a Recommended, Optional and Required packages. (Dependencies). Can you answer me Yes or No or When on my questions. 1. Required packages needs to installed before current package?: I think, YES. 2. When Recommended package needs installed bef

Thunderbird 3.0.1

Hi I managed to compile Thunderbird 3.0.1 with the attached .mozconfig file (basically a slightly modified Firefox .mozconfig file) using the following command to compile & install: "make -f client.mk build && make -f client.mkinstall" During the compilation and installation process I encountered

Re: blfs-book-svn-html

stosss wrote these words on 02/10/10 02:35 CST: > What is different between these two? > > blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-04 > blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-09 > > Both only show changes as of 02/03 and this is also at the top of the > page for both of them svn-20100203. I double checked to make sure I

blfs-book-svn-html

What is different between these two? blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-04 blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-09 Both only show changes as of 02/03 and this is also at the top of the page for both of them svn-20100203. I double checked to make sure I had the right one. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/lis