On 11/19/2011 06:59 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> For my client (seamonkey), the Reply-to: is visible. Return-Path: is
> not. Besides the return path is
> which is slightly confusing.
Yeah, you have to add it. Unfortunately, I've been using that and
carrying over for so long, I really don't rec
On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 16:53 -0600, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 11/19/2011 02:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > I'll take a look and see what I can do, but I've had filters for years
> > on the Reply-To: address. That is:
> >
> > BLFS Support List
> > LFS Support List
> >
> > etc.
> >
> > -- Bruce
>
> I'
DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 11/19/2011 02:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>>> I do not know to which list should I address this.
>>>
>>> I am having a little trouble with the messages, now that I am trying
>>> to follow more than one *lfs* list. Worse, when the same message is a
>
On 11/19/2011 02:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> I do not know to which list should I address this.
>>
>> I am having a little trouble with the messages, now that I am trying
>> to follow more than one *lfs* list. Worse, when the same message is a
>> notification simultan
--- Em sáb, 19/11/11, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> De: Bruce Dubbs
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] Request
> Para: "BLFS Support List"
> Data: Sábado, 19 de Novembro de 2011, 18:51
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
...
> > I am having a little trouble with the messages
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> I do not know to which list should I address this.
>
> I am having a little trouble with the messages, now that I am trying
> to follow more than one *lfs* list. Worse, when the same message is a
> notification simultaneously sent to more than one list.
>
> I would l
I do not know to which list should I address this.
I am having a little trouble with the messages, now that I am trying to follow
more than one *lfs* list. Worse, when the same message is a notification
simultaneously sent to more than one list.
I would like to suggest, to the maintainers (Bruc
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> Spot on. Unprivileged + DESTDIR means you can play around to your
> heart's desire. Sometimes you have to grep around or hack things a bit
> to support a DESTDIR style install. Since the vast majority of
> packages are autotooled, though, my basic procedure is this:
>
> ./c
On 10/11/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan Lord wrote these words on 10/11/07 09:36 CST:
>
> [cc'd to BLFS-Support]
>
> > But I'm really interested in how you (the BLFS contributors) go about
> > working out how and where everything goes? Do you set the --prefix
> > switch to som
Alan Lord wrote these words on 10/11/07 09:36 CST:
[cc'd to BLFS-Support]
> But I'm really interested in how you (the BLFS contributors) go about
> working out how and where everything goes? Do you set the --prefix
> switch to somewhere like /test/asterisk_build and then look to see what
> wen
Le Vendredi 23 Juin 2006 12:42, Warren Wilder a écrit :
Hi !
> I have a dhcp enabled system, which occasionely doesn't have the network
> cable plugged in. ( silly, but true )
> At boot time, the dhcp request halts the system for several seconds,
> which is gradually getting
On 6/23/06, Warren Wilder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a dhcp enabled system, which occasionely doesn't have the network
cable plugged in. ( silly, but true )
At boot time, the dhcp request halts the system for several seconds,
which is gradually getting annoying.
Can I remo
I have a dhcp enabled system, which occasionely doesn't have the network
cable plugged in. ( silly, but true )
At boot time, the dhcp request halts the system for several seconds,
which is gradually getting annoying.
Can I remove the dhcp request from the boot process to some other
pr
I would like to see some sort of Cpanel, theres a good free one which is open
source heres link:
http://vhcs.net/
Im trying to install it but not sure what I have to do..
Thanks
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Uns
14 matches
Mail list logo
