--- José Carlos Carrión Plaza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ¿Anyone likes the venerable Motif?
>
> It's clean, simple, robust, pretty (for me, of course), and at last,
> it's free (http:// www.openmotif.org).
Are you sure about that URL? I looked and could not find it. Isn't this the
same thing:
whoops, I meant Alan Lord's response was word for word what I would
have said. Sorry for the accidental top response.
-Doug
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
This is almost word for ward what I was going to write. I started
using blackbox back in 98 I think it was, and back then on my much
slower computer it was awesome, the extremely slim design made it run
so much faster than anything else I could use. But to get things like
working battery monitors
Randy McMurchy wrote:
The first step in getting something included into BLFS would be to
create a hint for the package(s). If there is community interest and
an editor is willing to accept responsibility and future maintenance
of the package(s), there is a good chance it would get added.
But it
Hi,
I used to use Fluxbox and liked it very much.
However after playing with the LiveCD, I discovered XFCE and this is now
my prefered wm, simply for look and feel really. It comes with a
filemanager (if you want to install it...) but it isn't that great
(read: intuative as I can't work out how
Richard A Downing escribió:
I use OpenBox3, possibly the most minimalist WM that uses XML for it's
configuration files. Then I add PyPanel for the 'where the hell is that
app I started a few hours ago?' feeling. I use mrxvt instead of xterm
for the tabbed virtual screens.
I like OpenBox3's me
I use OpenBox3, possibly the most minimalist WM that uses XML for it's
configuration files. Then I add PyPanel for the 'where the hell is that
app I started a few hours ago?' feeling. I use mrxvt instead of xterm
for the tabbed virtual screens.
I like OpenBox3's menus, although you need a good X
Dan McGhee wrote:
I know that I could just go find a file manager to use with fluxbox.
Would I be heading for the "bloat" that I'm trying to avoid if I tried
the WindowMaker-GNUstep combination? I am also willing to try this
combination to see how it works and provide input to this list wi
--- Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan McGhee wrote these words on 09/28/05 19:10 CST:
>
> > I know that I could just go find a file manager to use with fluxbox.
> > Would I be heading for the "bloat" that I'm trying to avoid if I tried
> > the WindowMaker-GNUstep combination? I a
Dan McGhee wrote these words on 09/28/05 19:10 CST:
> I know that I could just go find a file manager to use with fluxbox.
> Would I be heading for the "bloat" that I'm trying to avoid if I tried
> the WindowMaker-GNUstep combination? I am also willing to try this
> combination to see how it
My goals in building a BLFS system were:
1. divorce myself from package dependencies that exist in some distros
2. intall only the packages necessary for me
3. make the system easy to operate for my family
I have achieved 1. and 2. I've been using fluxbox and, if it were me
alone, I wouldn'
11 matches
Mail list logo
