On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 15:35 -0500, stosss wrote:
>> Why is it that you and other developers are so touchy about the book
>> and its condition and people pointing out things that could be done
>> different, better or whatever? Why do you and the
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 15:35 -0500, stosss wrote:
> Why is it that you and other developers are so touchy about the book
> and its condition and people pointing out things that could be done
> different, better or whatever? Why do you and the others insist on
> thinking there is nothing wrong with t
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> stosss wrote:
>
>> I am not complaining. I am simply asking.
>
> Sometimes its hard to interpret words when they are only written.
Yes, that is the problem with written communication.
> My interpretation of your words was a complaint. It may
stosss wrote:
[putolin]
>> Exactly and the 2010-02-09 and 2010-02-10 both have 20100203 at the
>> top of the page. The last entry in the change log is February 3rd,
>> 2010 according to this the book has not changed in seven days. Hence
>> my original question.
>>
>>
>
> Also what is the poin
stosss wrote:
> I am not complaining. I am simply asking.
Sometimes its hard to interpret words when they are only written.
My interpretation of your words was a complaint. It may not have been
your intent.
> volunteer project. I am not expecting you to do things as though you
> have to. I a
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Johnneylee Rollins
wrote:
>> I am just pointing out the facts as can be found by searching the
>> archives of any of the LFS mailing lists. I am not trying to be
>> accusatory or rude. Your response is the typical response that can
>> also by found in the same arch
> I am just pointing out the facts as can be found by searching the
> archives of any of the LFS mailing lists. I am not trying to be
> accusatory or rude. Your response is the typical response that can
> also by found in the same archives to the challenges made by many.
I'm glad it's typical to y
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Matthew Burgess
wrote:
> stosss wrote:
>
>> Why is it that you and other developers are so touchy about the book
>> and its condition and people pointing out things that could be done
>> different, better or whatever? Why do you and the others insist on
>> thinking
>> Also what is the point of a nightly snapshot if the book has not changed?
> Because it is set up as a cron job and I didn't go to the effort of
> trying to figure out if any of the 300 or so pages changed.
>
> Most people will look at the document itself, especially the chang
stosss wrote:
> Why is it that you and other developers are so touchy about the book
> and its condition and people pointing out things that could be done
> different, better or whatever? Why do you and the others insist on
> thinking there is nothing wrong with the book and so unwilling to
> impr
stosss wrote:
> Why is it that you and other developers are so touchy about the book
> and its condition and people pointing out things that could be done
> different, better or whatever? Why do you and the others insist on
> thinking there is nothing wrong with the book and so unwilling to
> impr
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:35 PM, stosss wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> stosss wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
stosss wrote:
> Also what is the point of a nightly snapshot if the book has not changed?
Because it i
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> stosss wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> stosss wrote:
>>>
Also what is the point of a nightly snapshot if the book has not changed?
>>> Because it is set up as a cron job and I didn't go to the effort of
>
stosss wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> stosss wrote:
>>
>>> Also what is the point of a nightly snapshot if the book has not changed?
>> Because it is set up as a cron job and I didn't go to the effort of
>> trying to figure out if any of the 300 or so pages changed
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> stosss wrote:
>
>> Also what is the point of a nightly snapshot if the book has not changed?
>
> Because it is set up as a cron job and I didn't go to the effort of
> trying to figure out if any of the 300 or so pages changed.
>
> Most people w
stosss wrote:
> Also what is the point of a nightly snapshot if the book has not changed?
Because it is set up as a cron job and I didn't go to the effort of
trying to figure out if any of the 300 or so pages changed.
Most people will look at the document itself, especially the change log,
to
>>>>> What is different between these two?
>>>>>
>>>>> blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-04
>>>>> blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-09
>>>>>
>>>>> Both only show changes as of 02/03 and this is also at the top of the
>
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> stosss wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Randy McMurchy
>> wrote:
>>> stosss wrote these words on 02/10/10 02:35 CST:
>>>> What is different between these two?
>>>>
>>>> b
stosss wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Randy McMurchy
> wrote:
>> stosss wrote these words on 02/10/10 02:35 CST:
>>> What is different between these two?
>>>
>>> blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-04
>>> blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-09
>>>
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Randy McMurchy
wrote:
> stosss wrote these words on 02/10/10 02:35 CST:
>> What is different between these two?
>>
>> blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-04
>> blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-09
>>
>> Both only show changes as of 02/03 and
stosss wrote these words on 02/10/10 02:35 CST:
> What is different between these two?
>
> blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-04
> blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-09
>
> Both only show changes as of 02/03 and this is also at the top of the
> page for both of them svn-20100203. I double c
What is different between these two?
blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-04
blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-09
Both only show changes as of 02/03 and this is also at the top of the
page for both of them svn-20100203. I double checked to make sure I
had the right one.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
22 matches
Mail list logo
