Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 15:12:05 +0200
From: "Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers"
Subject: Re: network manager config
To: BLFS Support List
Message-ID: <201004091512.05397.edgaralw...@gmx.de>
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
>On Friday 09 April 2010 01:12:05 D
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 15:12 +0200, Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers wrote:
> In mho, wicd should become incorporate in KDE as the standard network
> manager.
Unlikely, given the relative maturity of wicd vs NM.
Wicd currently supports only Ethernet and Wifi - it has no support for
3G connections, no PPP/
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 07:38 -0300, Maginot Junior wrote:
> Well, let me say that I'm trying to make network-manager work like
> expected on my distro too
Pointless, as far as I'm concerned. Integration with distro-specific
config files is only useful if you have some reason for wanting to keep
tho
On Friday 09 April 2010 01:12:05 Dale Stein wrote:
> Hi, I was building NetworkManager-0.8 and one of the config options which
> apparently is required
> is the --with-distro= It builds just fine with Debian as the distro.
> What distro would lfs be closest to?
> Thanks!
Hi Dale,
there is a pa
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 6:47 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 18:12 -0500, Dale Stein wrote:
>> Hi, I was building NetworkManager-0.8 and one of the config options
>> which apparently is required
>>
>> is the --with-distro= It builds just fine with Debian as the distro.
>> What dist
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 18:12 -0500, Dale Stein wrote:
> Hi, I was building NetworkManager-0.8 and one of the config options
> which apparently is required
>
> is the --with-distro= It builds just fine with Debian as the distro.
> What distro would lfs be closest to?
> Thanks!
I use Redhat, but i
Hi, I was building NetworkManager-0.8 and one of the config options which
apparently is required
is the --with-distro= It builds just fine with Debian as the distro.
What distro would lfs be closest to?
Thanks!
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfro
