Re: question about librsvg

2006-05-28 Thread Michiel Faber
Simon Geard schreef: On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 14:06 -0600, Archaic wrote: Nautilus doesn't display $HOME on the desktop, but it does display $HOME/Desktop, which is close enough for me. Actually you can put your $HOME on the desktop. With the configuration editor you can set in

Re: question about librsvg

2006-05-23 Thread Simon Geard
On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 14:06 -0600, Archaic wrote: I've found a few different things that allow you to put application icons on the desktop. However, this isn't what I want. I want to put files/dirs on my desktop. It's the one sinful little desire ;) where I actually like the flash and dash of

Re: question about librsvg

2006-05-23 Thread Archaic
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 08:22:42PM +1200, Simon Geard wrote: You could install Gnome :) The whole point of the discussion was to avoid those 2 bloated DE's. :) Nautilus doesn't display $HOME on the desktop, but it does display $HOME/Desktop, which is close enough for me. Better, even, since

Re: question about librsvg

2006-05-23 Thread Alan Lord
The whole point of the discussion was to avoid those 2 bloated DE's. :) Nautilus doesn't display $HOME on the desktop, but it does display $HOME/Desktop, which is close enough for me. Better, even, since $HOME tends to be a lot more cluttered than I want my desktop to be. I tend to use it to

Re: question about librsvg

2006-05-22 Thread Archaic
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 05:12:11PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: I think there is a way to edit the context menu, but I'm not sure. At the very least, you can add nautilus scripts. They can be shell scripts or whatever. See here: I've found a few different things that allow you to put

Re: question about librsvg

2006-05-21 Thread TheOldFellow
Archaic wrote: On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:48:21PM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote: Openbox is worth a look too. http://icculus.org/openbox/ It looks nice, but it suffers from the same problem that caused me to leave fluxbox: no panel or taskbar. I use pypanel for this with openbox3. --

Re: question about librsvg

2006-05-21 Thread Andrew Benton
Dan Nicholson wrote: I think there is a way to edit the context menu, but I'm not sure. The context menu seems to be hard coded in nautilus-2.14.1/src/file-manager/fm-directory-view.c Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ:

Re: question about librsvg

2006-05-20 Thread Andrew Benton
Archaic wrote: On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 05:11:31PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: But no, you will not be missing out any any major functionality that I can think of. It's cool eye candy and not much else. That's what I figured. I'm not a big fan of eye candy. I'm also not a big fan of complex

Re: question about librsvg

2006-05-20 Thread Archaic
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:48:21PM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote: Openbox is worth a look too. http://icculus.org/openbox/ It looks nice, but it suffers from the same problem that caused me to leave fluxbox: no panel or taskbar. I'd have to install a large chunk of gnome or KDE to get them. Hrmm.

Re: question about librsvg

2006-05-20 Thread Andrew Benton
Archaic wrote: It looks nice, but it suffers from the same problem that caused me to leave fluxbox: no panel or taskbar. I'd have to install a large chunk of gnome or KDE to get them. Hrmm. I may be talking myself into staying with Xfce afterall... ;) Fluxbox has a toolbar Now to side-track

Re: question about librsvg

2006-05-20 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 5/20/06, Andrew Benton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know. It may be possible I've not looked into it, I learnt to live without seeing stuff on the desktop. I launch rox from the right click menu and then navigate into the Desktop folder to see what's there. I install most of gnome and

question about librsvg

2006-05-19 Thread Archaic
I've never had a desire to build this, but I'm messing around with the beta xfce and it has it as an optional dep. The stable xfce does, too, but I've never used it. From what I can tell, it simply allows xfce to use svg icons instead of png icons. The images are the same from what I can tell,

Re: question about librsvg

2006-05-19 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 5/19/06, Archaic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've never had a desire to build this, but I'm messing around with the beta xfce and it has it as an optional dep. The stable xfce does, too, but I've never used it. From what I can tell, it simply allows xfce to use svg icons instead of png icons.

Re: question about librsvg

2006-05-19 Thread Archaic
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 05:11:31PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: But no, you will not be missing out any any major functionality that I can think of. It's cool eye candy and not much else. That's what I figured. I'm not a big fan of eye candy. I'm also not a big fan of complex windowed

Re: question about librsvg

2006-05-19 Thread Simon Geard
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 17:59 -0600, Archaic wrote: I've never had a desire to build this, but I'm messing around with the beta xfce and it has it as an optional dep. The stable xfce does, too, but I've never used it. From what I can tell, it simply allows xfce to use svg icons instead of png