> Hi Paul, since you mentioned firefox I'll just mention (to everybody
> else, I suspect you don't care ;) that 48.0.2 almost certainly has
> vulnerabilities. At the moment ff45 apparently has ESR releases -
> until ff-52 is out. But that still means rebuilding on every point
> releasse.
Good poi
Paul Rogers wrote:
Is there a correct file somewhere I could get it? It would save me a
lot of work reconciling my 413 packages, TIA
No. Sorry. There are .md5sum files for each package though.
You can get those and 'cat *.md5sum > MD5SUMS'.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.or
Is there a correct file somewhere I could get it? It would save me a
lot of work reconciling my 413 packages, TIA
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
--
http://www
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:45:12AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:20:32AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> >
> > But I'm glad you are updating. I was going to suggest that you read
> > the errata, but in fact those for sysv probably don't specifically
> > mention anything you buil
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:20:32AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> But I'm glad you are updating. I was going to suggest that you read
> the errata, but in fact those for sysv probably don't specifically
> mention anything you build - in practice, the versions in svn for
> the xorg packages (not libX
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 02:52:35PM -0800, Paul Rogers wrote:
> I'm prepping to upgrade to 7.10. (Hey, that's uncommonly recent for
> me!) I get the files from OSUOSL because it's "close" and fast. I'm
> reconciling the packages with the 413 I already have in my 7.7, and got
> tripped up because
Paul Rogers wrote:
It raises a question of the integrity of the whole file.
I've found other errors, the ALSA versions are 1.0.13. It appears
the file is unreliable.
I don't know why the MD5SUMS file has wrong data, but it does. A spot
check of the files and the individual md5sum files se
> It raises a question of the integrity of the whole file.
I've found other errors, the ALSA versions are 1.0.13. It appears
the file is unreliable.
--
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this
I'm prepping to upgrade to 7.10. (Hey, that's uncommonly recent for
me!) I get the files from OSUOSL because it's "close" and fast. I'm
reconciling the packages with the 413 I already have in my 7.7, and got
tripped up because the MD5SUMS file has firefox-2.0.0.15, though the
tarball is version
