Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: New Canvas 2D API

On 14/10/2021 23:06, Aaron Krajeski wrote: > *Specification* > Context Lost Event > > Context Restored Event > > Will Read Frequently >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove clamping of setTimeout(..., 0)

Thanks again! So can I suppose I have your LGTMs now and be approved to proceed the final ship to M97? On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 12:15:08 AM UTC+8 jste...@chromium.org wrote: > M97 is also a better alternative in that it's not a release that will be > supported for 8 weeks, as M96 would

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Digital Goods API v2.0

Probably not before the OT starts, but yes before the OT finishes. I am adding a metric to see if there's any attempted usage of the API in this way currently, so we will need to get that out, then wait a milestone to see the result. That approach was OK'd by privacy review. Also note that this

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: [WebAuthn] Authenticator Attachment in Public Key Credential

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 5:53 PM 'David Waite' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Not knowing Blink's policies here, I'd like to point out that while the PR > was merged, the WebAuthn WG charter that would lead to Level 3 has not yet > been approved. > You can learn more about

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: [WebAuthn] Authenticator Attachment in Public Key Credential

Not knowing Blink's policies here, I'd like to point out that while the PR was merged, the WebAuthn WG charter that would lead to Level 3 has not yet been approved. On Thursday, October 14, 2021 at 2:49:39 AM UTC-6 yoav...@chromium.org wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 6:17 PM 'zakaria ridouh'

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: User-Agent Client Hints GREASE Update

Contact emails mreichh...@chromium.org, b...@chromium.org, miketa...@chromium.org, jadekess...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/ua-client-hints#user-agent-client-hints Specification https://wicg.github.io/ua-client-hints/#create-arbitrary-brands-section

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: User Agent Reduction Origin Trial

Just an FYI, the blog post has been updated to give instructions on how to participate in the User-Agent Reduction Origin Trial as a third-party embed: https://developer.chrome.com/blog/user-agent-reduction-origin-trial/#how-to-participate-in-the-origin-trial-as-a-third-party-embed On Tue, Sep

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: New Canvas 2D API

*Contact emails*aaro...@chromium.org, fs...@chromium.org *Explainer* https://github.com/fserb/canvas2d https://youtu.be/dfOKFSDG7IM *Specification* Context Lost Event Context Restored Event

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Implement: Import maps, basic support

Hey Tzvetelin, thanks for chiming in. We currently don't have anyone working on worker support for import maps, but getting feedback like this is really helpful for knowing what developers are missing. We know that there are several desired features for import maps (external import maps, multiple

[blink-dev] RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Intent to Implement and Ship: Feature policy for Keyboard API

Can you clarify what the current situation is? getLayoutMap() which is part of the Keyboard API can only be accessed in the top browsing context which cuts off access from same and cross origin iframes. With this permission policy based solution, the default value would be "Self" that grants

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Implement and Ship: Feature policy for Keyboard API

On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 12:33:19 AM UTC+2 snianu wrote: > Contact emails > > sni...@microsoft.com > > > Explainer > > https://github.com/WICG/keyboard-map/issues/38 > > > Specification > > https://wicg.github.io/keyboard-map/#permissions-policy > > > Summary > > getLayoutMap() used

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS @counter-style descriptor 'speak-as'

Hi everyone, I'm withdrawing this intent. With a discussion with the accessibility team, we found this approach (based on alternative text) problematic. We'll try a different approach via CSS AAM . This will allow us to pass the original marker text +

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTP->HTTPS redirect for HTTPS DNS records

LGTM3 with the same conditional. Thanks! On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 12:06 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM2 conditional on landing the PR > > On Monday, October 11, 2021 at 8:47:09 PM UTC+2 Mike West wrote: > >> LGTM1. >> >> I've reviewed the Fetch PR, and while I think there's work to do to >> explain

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTP->HTTPS redirect for HTTPS DNS records

LGTM2 conditional on landing the PR On Monday, October 11, 2021 at 8:47:09 PM UTC+2 Mike West wrote: > LGTM1. > > I've reviewed the Fetch PR, and while I think there's work to do to > explain exactly how this work, I think we're in a good place to land > initially. Thanks for putting the patch

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Auto-expand details elements

Though I notice that there were some good comments about documentation in the TAG thread and that documentation should be added before this reaches stable (the sooner the better). /Daniel On 2021-10-14 21:02, Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM3 /Daniel On 2021-10-07 21:07, Mike West wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Auto-expand details elements

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2021-10-07 21:07, Mike West wrote: LGTM2. Please do follow up on any feedback you obtain from the TAG, since I believe the review request there is still outstanding. It doesn't appear to me that there are substantial design questions that are still open, but if something

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Implement: Import maps, basic support

Hi, This is a great feature, long time expected. Main thread can benefit from it. What are the future plans for other threads? Is there development that will cover workers? For threaded web app this feature looks like half done job. Thanks, Tzvetelin Vassilev В 1:36:23 ч. UTC+3на понеделник,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove clamping of setTimeout(..., 0)

M97 is also a better alternative in that it's not a release that will be supported for 8 weeks, as M96 would be, and thus we'll be in a better position to handle any fallout from this in M97. On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 6:32 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > Ah, yeah. I think I intended to write M97 (but I'm

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove clamping of setTimeout(..., 0)

Ah, yeah. I think I intended to write M97 (but I'm admittedly terrible with calendars). That seems like a good milestone to try to ship. On 10/14/21 5:01 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: If I'm reading the Chromium Dashboard schedule correctly, M97 stable will

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: [WebAuthn] Authenticator Attachment in Public Key Credential

On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 6:17 PM 'zakaria ridouh' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > *Contact emails* > > rid...@google.com > > > *Explainer* > > Add the authenticator attachment (platform/cross-platform) used during > both registration and authentication to the public key credential

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Digital Goods API v2.0

Is it possible to disallow delegation for the OT as well? On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 6:46 AM Glen Robertson wrote: > Yes, we are planning to disallow delegation before shipping. This was > discussed in the privacy review on the launch bug >