Re: [blink-dev] Question about Shipping vs Continue Experimenting

2021-12-02 Thread Yoav Weiss
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 6:16 AM Jiewei Qian wrote: > Hi blink-dev, > > Our Handwriting Recognition API origin trial ends in M97. M98 branches in > a week. > > We want to get some recommendations on shipping vs continuing > experimenting. > > At the moment: > >- > >We have just 1 app using

[blink-dev] Question about Shipping vs Continue Experimenting

2021-12-02 Thread Jiewei Qian
Hi blink-dev, Our Handwriting Recognition API origin trial ends in M97. M98 branches in a week. We want to get some recommendations on shipping vs continuing experimenting. At the moment: - We have just 1 app using the origin trial (based on received feedback), so there is little

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype and Ship: Control character handling in cookies

2021-12-02 Thread Andrew Williams
Thanks for the link, Daniel, and thank you to Mike as well for sending me a Chrome Enterprise PoC to reach out to. Yoav, do you think waiting two or three months between when we implement DevTools Issues / deprecation reports for this and when we do the removal would be sufficient? Is there a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Network Access preflight requests for subresources

2021-12-02 Thread 'Titouan Rigoudy' via blink-dev
I agree! Cheers, Titouan On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 5:17 PM Mike West wrote: > _I_ don't think we should do that, but I'd defer to Titouan's preference. > :) > > -mike > > > On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 5:14 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > >> Thanks - I also don't think there's a lot of value in this

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Network Access preflight requests for subresources

2021-12-02 Thread Mike Taylor
Thanks - I also don't think there's a lot of value in this particular header being the odd-one-out, just wanted to confirm we're not going to ship "true" first and try to change that to ?1 later (which is always challenging). On 12/2/21 11:11 AM, Mike West wrote: I'm not sure it makes sense

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Network Access preflight requests for subresources

2021-12-02 Thread Mike West
I'm not sure it makes sense to introduce a structured header here, given that it's layering on top of CORS headers that I don't think there's substantial interest in changing. -mike On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 4:55 PM 'Titouan Rigoudy' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi Mike, > >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Network Access preflight requests for subresources

2021-12-02 Thread 'Titouan Rigoudy' via blink-dev
Hi Mike, There is no support for structured headers so far, for consistency reasons, and there has been no movement to deprecate the "true" value for Access-Control-Allow-Credentials. The value of such a deprecation seems minimal. I could pretty easily add support for the structured "?1" value

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Network Access preflight requests for subresources

2021-12-02 Thread Mike Taylor
Hi Titouan, I'm curious what the plan is for structured headers. https://github.com/WICG/private-network-access/issues/45 is marked as blocked - has there been other progress or thinking behind the scenes? thanks, Mike On 11/29/21 10:36 AM, 'Titouan Rigoudy' via blink-dev wrote: