[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Region Capture

The discussions around Region Capture have been brought up with TAG again (after their original approval of the design). Here are the minutes from that second meeting: https://github.com/w3ctag/meetings/blob/gh-pages/2

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Region Capture

LGTM1 Thanks for initiating those discussions. My read of the minutes is that they consider the async approach to be fine, and don't arbitrate on the naming questions, other than saying that none of the proposals seem better than where this API has landed. (and some may add confusion) As such it s

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Fenced frames

On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 12:31 AM Shivani Sharma wrote: > Contact emails > > shivani...@chromium.org, d...@chromium.org, jkar...@chromium.org > > Explainer > > https://github.com/WICG/fenced-frame/tree/master/explainer > > Specification > > https://wicg.github.io/fenced-frame/ (a rough shell at th

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Dark mode support for web apps

LGTM to experiment till M104 (inclusive). Note that any extensions beyond this one would require showing substantial progress towards shipping. On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 7:07 AM 'Louise Brett' via blink-dev < blink-dev@

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Region Capture

LGTM2 On 5/2/22 7:15 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 Thanks for initiating those discussions. My read of the minutes is that they consider the async approach to be fine, and don't arbitrate on the naming questions, other than saying that none of the proposals seem better than where this API has

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Load common payloads from privacy-preserving single-keyed cache

If it's a feature flag, please put milestones in the the appropriate dev trial milestone fields. Thanks Joe Medley | Technical Writer, Chrome DevRel | jmed...@google.com | 816-678-7195 *If an API's not documented it doesn't exist.* On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 5:56 PM Daisuke Enomoto wrote: > Hi Jo

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Origin Trial: Trial for SharedArrayBuffers in non-isolated pages on Desktop platforms

Does this metric count sites that have opted into the rOT? My company has a web product hosted under dozens of domains that has the rOT registered for each one of them. I don't see those domains in the top 156 list (admittedly a quick scan), so I wonder if it is only counting pages that try t

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Region Capture

LGTM3 On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 6:50 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 > > On 5/2/22 7:15 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: > > LGTM1 > > Thanks for initiating those discussions. My read of the minutes is that > they consider the async approach to be fine, and don't arbitrate on the > naming questions, other than

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Region Capture

When do you intend to ship this? 103? Joe Medley | Technical Writer, Chrome DevRel | jmed...@google.com | 816-678-7195 *If an API's not documented it doesn't exist.* On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 7:55 AM Chris Harrelson wrote: > LGTM3 > > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 6:50 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > >> LGTM2

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Region Capture

Either m104 or m105. (The Origin Trial is approved until m104, inclusive.) On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 7:46 PM Joe Medley wrote: > When do you intend to ship this? 103? > Joe Medley | Technical Writer, Chrome DevRel | jmed...@google.com | > 816-678-7195 <(816)%20678-7195> > *If an API's not documente

[blink-dev] There's still space to host a breakout talk at BlinkOn 16!

Bcc: blink-dev@ and BlinkOn 16 attendees TLDR: By Wednesday, May 11th, sign up here to host a breakout talk at blinkOn 16. Hi everyone, With BlinkOn 16 being just over two week

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Fenced frames

Thanks Yoav! On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 7:27 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 12:31 AM Shivani Sharma > wrote: > >> Contact emails >> >> shivani...@chromium.org, d...@chromium.org, jkar...@chromium.org >> >> Explainer >> >> https://github.com/WICG/fenced-frame/tree/master/explaine

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Origin Isolation By Default / Deprecate document.domain

Are there any future plans on eventually not honoring the Origin-Agent-Cluster: ?0 to allow setting document.domain ? Or will this header always be honored ? I read on another site that this Origin-Agent-Cluster: ?0 will only be honored in secure context (example: https://) Is this true ? Will i

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Topics API

Update: we've discovered a stability issue with the Topics API and fixed the code, but the Topics API has been disabled in the Privacy Sandbox Ads APIs Origin Trial for users that aren't running a version of Chrome with the fix applied. It will take a couple of weeks for the updated canary/dev/beta

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Remove: Legacy Client Hint Mode

We've heard back from Cloudflare and Akamai who don't seem to depend on this legacy Android behavior. This change is currently targeted for M104. ~ Ari Chivukula (Their/There/They're) On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 8:01 AM Ari Chivukula wrote: > That's a good question! At the moment there isn't a plan

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: Support visual-box on overflow-clip-margin

Contact emailskhushalsa...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/shared-element-transitions/blob/main/overflow_on_replaced_elements.md Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-overflow/#overflow-clip-margin Summary overflow-clip-margin specifies how far an element's content is allowed

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: Support visual-box on overflow-clip-margin

On 5/2/22 23:52, Khushal Sagar wrote: Gecko: In development (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1661582 ) We're not opposed to this feature, but having a bug on file isn't quite the same as in development :