Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove non-standard appearance keywords

LGTM3. On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 1:22 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > /Daniel > On 2023-08-30 17:46, Alex Russell wrote: > > Thanks for being flexible here! > > LGTM1 to deprecate the first set of keywords (below < 0.001% use). Thanks > for coming back to us about the second set. > > Best, >

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype And Ship: Allow transferring ArrayBuffer into VideoFrame, AudioData, EncodedVideoChunk, EncodedAudioChunk, ImageDecoder constructors

TAG review: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/889 On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:50 AM Dale Curtis wrote: > Alex, I assume you mean TAG's views on consistency regarding transfer > ergonomics? Otherwise https://www.w3.org/TR/design-principles/#consistency > is what we followed here. We h

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Sec-CH-Prefers-Reduced-Transparency User Preference Media Features Client Hints Header

Contact emails lukewarlow...@gmail.com , l...@warlow.dev Explainer https://github.com/wicg/user-preference-media-features-headers/blob/main/README.md Specification https://wicg.github.io/user-preference-media-features-headers/#sec-ch-prefe

[blink-dev] PSA: Improved covering and nested scroll snap handling

Hi blink-dev, We have been landing several improvements to the physics of scroll snap handling for edge cases around nested snap areas and covering (larger than the viewport) snap areas in M118:

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: TLS Encrypted Client Hello (ECH)

We are ramping ECH up to 10% of Stable Channel. We will send an Intent-to-Ship if the rollout continues successfully. On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 10:38 AM Achiel van der Mandele < ach...@cloudflare.com> wrote: > That's great to hear! Looking forward to ECH traffic ramping up (from the > looks of it 1

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Form Controls Support Vertical Writing Mode

Hi! Thanks for the quick LGTM, sending a quick update on feature as we are preparing to ship part of it in 118. Due to a bug for the text based form controls (crbug.com/484651), we are planning to ship this feature in two parts. *FormControlsVerticalWritingModeSupport* * select * meter * progres

[blink-dev] PSA: Opener Storage Partitioning Explainer

*Contact Emails* aric...@chromium.org, ahem...@chromium.org, tito...@chromium.org, miketa...@chromium.org, cl...@chromium.org *Explainer* https://github.com/arichiv/opener-storage-partitioning/blob/main/README.md *Summary* This proposal seeks to prevent or limit same-origin cross-frame communicat

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: SVGImageElement.crossOrigin attribute.

Thanks! Yes it has a base::Feature toggle; one is automatically included: https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:third_party/blink/renderer/platform/runtime_enabled_features.json5;l=120;drc=86659902320c9a6ff1083688c928109df3d84f25 https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype And Ship: Allow transferring ArrayBuffer into VideoFrame, AudioData, EncodedVideoChunk, EncodedAudioChunk, ImageDecoder constructors

Alex, I assume you mean TAG's views on consistency regarding transfer ergonomics? Otherwise https://www.w3.org/TR/design-principles/#consistency is what we followed here. We have not asked, given that we felt this was a small performance improvement, with pre-existing ergonomics, and already has Me

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Relative Color Syntax (RCS)

Hey Aaron, thanks for the links. I'm goint to LGTM1 this on the condition you dot some i's and cross some t's. First, please use the Mozilla Standards Positions process to guage their temperature rather than links to bugs: https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/ When Mozilla replie

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove non-standard appearance keywords

LGTM2 /Daniel On 2023-08-30 17:46, Alex Russell wrote: Thanks for being flexible here! LGTM1 to deprecate the first set of keywords (below < 0.001% use). Thanks for coming back to us about the second set. Best, Alex On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 4:18:11 PM UTC-7 Di Zhang wrote: Than

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate: Remove "Sanitizer API MVP"

Hey all, We had a long conversation about this in today's API OWNERS meeting, and per my previous note, I'm going to LGTM3 this with conditions because: - Usage is low, but growing - The spec changes have been merged into HTML, reducing risk for moving to the new API somewhat - Whil

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype And Ship: Allow transferring ArrayBuffer into VideoFrame, AudioData, EncodedVideoChunk, EncodedAudioChunk, ImageDecoder constructors

In addition to Alex's question, I also noticed that you answered the web-platform-tests with a "no", which is a bit unexpected to me. Is there a reason this cannot or won't be tested in web-platform-tests? /Daniel On 2023-08-30 18:03, Alex Russell wrote: Hey Eugene, I'm a little worried that

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS pages with Cache-control: no-store and Back/Forward Cache

In this whole discussion I am missing input from web developers. They must have expectations and opinions on these flags, but what do we know about their expectations and opinons? What is best industry practices? Is there a way to get more of that kind of input? /Daniel On 2023-07-31 02:59, '

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype And Ship: Allow transferring ArrayBuffer into VideoFrame, AudioData, EncodedVideoChunk, EncodedAudioChunk, ImageDecoder constructors

Hey Eugene, I'm a little worried that we're debating API shape here when there hasn't been any guidance from the TAG on design consistency. Have you either asked the TAG to weigh in (didn't see a review link in the Intent) or asked Chromium (ex)TAG members to give the API a once-over? Best, A

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: Generic Sensor WebDriver endpoints

LGTM3 On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 12:37 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023, 21:20 Mike Taylor wrote: > >> LGTM1 >> On 8/23/23 2:11 PM, Mathias Bynens wrote: >> >> Thank you for the detailed explanation. Proceeding as you described SGTM. >> >> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 7:41 PM Rapha

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove non-standard appearance keywords

Thanks for being flexible here! LGTM1 to deprecate the first set of keywords (below < 0.001% use). Thanks for coming back to us about the second set. Best, Alex On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 4:18:11 PM UTC-7 Di Zhang wrote: > Thanks to the advice above, I have done some improvements to the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Read Chrome device attributes

LGTM3 Please follow up on moving the entire namespace to be behind a managed permission (as Mozilla folks requested ) On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 5:40 PM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > /Daniel > On 2023-08-30 17:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Read Chrome device attributes

LGTM2 /Daniel On 2023-08-30 17:38, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM1 On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 12:03 PM 'Sergii Bykov' via blink-dev wrote: Hello colleagues, As discussed, I added images to the explainer with examples from ChromeOS of how a managed app and a managed setting look like

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Read Chrome device attributes

LGTM1 On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 12:03 PM 'Sergii Bykov' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hello colleagues, > > As discussed, I added images to the explainer with examples from ChromeOS > of how a managed app and a managed setting look like. > > Sergii > > > On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 1

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Relative Color Syntax (RCS)

That's not a public link, please could you make it public? That's not a great explainer actually (it's my own doc) these are better: https://blog.jim-nielsen.com/2021/css-relative-colors/ https://www.stefanjudis.com/notes/new-in-css-relative-colors/ Why no signals from Gecko? Have we filled a sta

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Media Queries: scripting feature

LGTM3 On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 5:18 PM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > /Daniel > > On 2023-08-30 17:02, Manuel Rego Casasnovas wrote: > > LGTM1 > > > > Thanks for catching up on this feature. > > > > Cheers, > >Rego > > > > On 26/08/2023 17:56, Luke wrote: > >> Contact emails > >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: SVGImageElement.crossOrigin attribute.

LGTM3 On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 8:23 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > /Daniel > On 2023-08-30 16:24, Yoav Weiss wrote: > > LGTM1 to ship, with a base flag to ensure we can rollback if needed. > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 6:16 PM Dale Curtis > wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 9:41 AM Dale Cu

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: SVGImageElement.crossOrigin attribute.

LGTM2 /Daniel On 2023-08-30 16:24, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 to ship, with a base flag to ensure we can rollback if needed. On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 6:16 PM Dale Curtis wrote: On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 9:41 AM Dale Curtis wrote: On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 7:36 PM Yoav Weiss

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Media Queries: scripting feature

LGTM2 /Daniel On 2023-08-30 17:02, Manuel Rego Casasnovas wrote: LGTM1 Thanks for catching up on this feature. Cheers, Rego On 26/08/2023 17:56, Luke wrote: Contact emails lukewarlow...@gmail.com , l...@warlow.dev

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: :user-valid and :user-invalid CSS pseudo-classes

I think those are the ones that are hard to manually trigger while working in the debugger. /Daniel On 2023-08-26 19:30, PhistucK wrote: I guess all of them would be good. Not really why only a few pseudo-classes are listed there... ☆*PhistucK* On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 6:18 PM Joey Arhar w

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Forbidden and escaped host characters compliant with the URL standard

Sounds good, consider this still approved. On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 12:02 AM Hayato Ito wrote: > Hi, there > > I'm now taking over ownership of this I2S from jiacheng@. > > Regarding the metrics, I found that we did a previous measurement here: > https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Media Queries: scripting feature

LGTM1 Thanks for catching up on this feature. Cheers, Rego On 26/08/2023 17:56, Luke wrote: > > Contact emails > > lukewarlow...@gmail.com > , l...@warlow.dev > > > Explainer > > None > > > Specification >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Relative Color Syntax (RCS)

On 29/08/2023 16:17, Aaron Krajeski wrote: > *Explainer: *go/rcs-chromium That's not a public link, please could you make it public? > Risks > > Interoperability and Compatibility > > None > > > /Gecko/: No signal Why no signals from Gecko? Have we filled a standa

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: SVGImageElement.crossOrigin attribute.

LGTM1 to ship, with a base flag to ensure we can rollback if needed. On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 6:16 PM Dale Curtis wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 9:41 AM Dale Curtis > wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 7:36 PM Yoav Weiss >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for working on this!! Eliminating resources whi

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Enrollment for Privacy Sandbox

Contact emails shivani...@chromium.org, georg...@google.com Explainer https://github.com/privacysandbox/attestation/blob/main/README.md Design document https://docs.google.com/document/d/16PYa6wBBGBbV4YMujkFzBab8s4a7N4PcvpY0Js1qN1k/edit?usp=sharing Specification While the enrollment process

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: FedCM Improvements: Error API, Account Auto Selected Flag, Hosted Domain and Revocation

Contact emails y...@chromium.org, n...@chromium.org Explainer Error API: https://github.com/fedidcg/FedCM/issues/488 AccountAutoSelectedFlag: https://github.com/fedidcg/FedCM/issues/497 Hosted domain: https://github.com/fedidcg/FedCM/issues/427 Revocation: https://github.com/fedidcg/FedCM/iss

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Bounce Tracking Mitigations

LGTM2 On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 5:44 PM Ben Kelly wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 1:40 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> I agree that WPT infrastructure shouldn't be a blocker when we're >> following other browsers. >> > > Thank you. > > Have y'all tested the mitigation with commonly used authentication