Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: 0.0.0.0 for Private Network Access

LGTM3 On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 11:43 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 5:41 PM Daniel Bratell wrote: > >> LGTM1 >> >> /Daniel >> On 2024-06-03 18:03, 'David Adrian' via blink-dev wrote: >> >> Contact emails l...@chromium.org >> >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Deprecate old CSS custom state syntax

Hey, 0.04% seems like a fairly sizable number. Do you know what the breakage looks like or whether this usage is limited to a library/a small set of large websites or something else? Ideally, this is feature detected with some fallback syntax On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 1:39 PM Joey Arhar wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Unable to write Serialized SkPicture into a File

Hey Steven, The path to convert information necessary for rendering into SkPictures may or may not exist in the Chromium codebase, but it's certainly not actively maintained or developed. Ultimately all information is available, but it may come from several different sources. For images, for

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: Capture all screens

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 11:17 AM 'Simon Hangl' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hello blink-dev, > > We’d like to ask for an extension to our Origin Trial, from M124 to M130. > This is due to a dependency on isolated web apps, which are delayed. > The intent process only allows

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Compute Pressure

Asking as a user, the spec draft recommends that user agents... ... show some form of user-visible notification that informs the user when > a pressure observer is active, as well as provides the user with the means > to block the

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: setHTMLUnsafe and parseHTMLUnsafe

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 1:53 PM Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > Non-API-owner opinions inline: > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 1:42 PM 'Vladimir Levin' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> I just had some clarifying questions >> >> On Wed, Fe

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: setHTMLUnsafe and parseHTMLUnsafe

I just had some clarifying questions On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 1:13 PM Joey Arhar wrote: > Some additional notes: > - This API is tested in the declarative ShadowDOM tests in interop2024, > and it is counting against us to not have it enabled by default. > - The future sanitization options will

Re: [blink-dev] Request for Deprecation Trial: Deprecate Mutation Events

On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 6:30 PM Mason Freed wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 7:12 AM Vladimir Levin wrote: > >> This is very exciting! Thank you for working on this. >> > > Thanks! > > >> Do you know whether the existing usage is feature checked? 1.58% seems >> very high, but if it's feature

Re: [blink-dev] Request for Deprecation Trial: Deprecate Mutation Events

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 8:54 PM Mason Freed wrote: > Contact emailsmas...@chromium.org > > ExplainerNone > > Specificationhttps://w3c.github.io/uievents/#legacy-event-types > > Summary > > Mutation Events, including `DOMSubtreeModified`, `DOMNodeInserted`, > `DOMNodeRemoved`,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Element Reflection

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 6:14 PM Alice Boxhall wrote: > > > On Thursday, February 1, 2024 at 6:52:13 AM UTC+11 vmp...@google.com > wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:10 AM alice wrote: > > Contact emails > al...@igalia.com, mere...@chromium.org > > Explainer > >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Element Reflection

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:10 AM alice wrote: > Contact emails > al...@igalia.com, meredi...@chromium.org > > Explainer > > https://github.com/WICG/aom/blob/gh-pages/aria-reflection-explainer.md#reflecting-element-references > > Specification > >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Network Access permission to relax mixed content

On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 5:07 AM 'Yifan Luo' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Contact emails...@chromium.org, cl...@chromium.org > > Explainer > https://github.com/WICG/private-network-access/blob/main/permission_prompt/explainer.md > >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: NavigationActivation

On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 4:27 AM Noam Rosenthal wrote: > Contact emailsjap...@chromium.org, nrosent...@chromium.org > > Explainer > https://github.com/WICG/view-transitions/blob/main/navigation-activation-explainer.md > > Specification >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate non-standard declarative shadow DOM serialization

On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 7:54 PM Mason Freed wrote: > > > On Friday, January 19, 2024 at 12:27:50 PM UTC-8 vmp...@google.com wrote: > > Interoperability and Compatibility > > The use counter for getInnerHTML() (https://chromestatus.com/ > metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/3874) shows 0.04% of

Re: [blink-dev] New API owner: Domenic Denicola

Congrats, Domenic! On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 3:59 PM Rick Byers wrote: > Hi blink-dev, > +Domenic Denicola has volunteered to donate his > time and considerable web platform expertise to reviewing intent threads as > an API owner. Domenic is very active in the web standards community > including

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate non-standard declarative shadow DOM serialization

On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 3:13 PM Mason Freed wrote: > Contact emailsmas...@chromium.org > > Explainer > https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/8867#issuecomment-1856696628 > > SpecificationNone > > Summary > > The prototype implementation (which was shipped in 2020 and then > shape-changed in

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: RTCRtpSender setParameters() extensions for requesting the generation of a key frame

Thank you for the detailed explanation. It's hard to decipher from meeting notes whether a discussion is bikeshedding or serious objections :) Based on your description, it does seem like there is good consensus Thanks, Vlad On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 5:14 AM Henrik Boström wrote: > Having

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: RTCRtpSender setParameters() extensions for requesting the generation of a key frame

Based on the WG discussion (meeting notes: https://www.w3.org/2023/05/16-webrtc-minutes.html#t04) it didn't seem that there is a very strong consensus that this is a right spot to add an extra parameter. There are also no signals on the RFPs, but the spec PR has landed. How would you assess the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: PointerEvent.deviceId for Mult-Pen Inking

On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 6:08 PM 'Sahir Vellani' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi all, good news! > > Reviving this thread because we have accomplished: > 1. TAG Review Completion: Extending the PointerEvent with Unique > DeviceId Attribute · Issue #880 · w3ctag/design-reviews

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Set methods

On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 1:51 PM Rezvan Mahdavi Hezaveh wrote: > Contact emailsrez...@chromium.org, s...@chromium.org > > ExplainerNone > > Specificationhttps://tc39.es/proposal-set-methods > > Summary > > Set methods are new methods like union and intersection that are added to > JavaScript's

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Changing File System Access API interaction with the back/forward cache

Ah that makes sense! Thank you for explaining! On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 1:57 PM 'Nathan Memmott' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Sorry, that was poorly worded. We evict "a page in BFCache if *[evicting > the page in BFCache]* allows another page to take an FSA lock." > > For

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: Changing File System Access API interaction with the back/forward cache

On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 8:17 PM 'Nathan Memmott' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Howdy blink-dev, > > In Chromium M121, we will update how the File System Access (FSA) API > interacts with the back/forward cache (BFCache). This should only affect > the conditions a page can

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGL drawingBufferStorage

On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 4:20 PM 'Christopher Cameron' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Contact emailsccame...@chromium.org > > ExplainerNone > > Specificationhttps://github.com/KhronosGroup/WebGL/pull/3222 > > Summary > > WebGL allows rendering into textures and renderbuffers of

Re: [blink-dev] Web-Facing Change PSA: Async Clipboard API: Write well-formed HTML document.

On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 6:05 PM 'Anupam Snigdha' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Contact emails > > sni...@microsoft.com, sa...@microsoft.com, est...@chromium.org > > Specification > > > https://w3c.github.io/clipboard-apis/#dom-clipboard-write > > Design docs > > >

Re: [blink-dev] Web-Facing Change PSA: align-content CSS property for blocks

On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:10 PM 一丝 wrote: > WebKit is being actively implemented: > https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/pull/21522 > > 以上 > 一丝 > > > PhistucK 于2023年12月12日周二 07:50写道： > >> > Low risk. This just expands coverage of a CSS property. >> >> Well... Not that low, perhaps? >> I think I

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: NavigateEvent sourceElement

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:41 PM Nate Chapin wrote: > Contact emailsjap...@chromium.org, dome...@chromium.org > > Explainer > https://github.com/WICG/navigation-api/commit/85edaf1d4d42355b020807cd56f6a22784978c3d > > SpecificationNone > > Summary > > When a navigation is initiated by an Element

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: contain-intrinsic-size: auto none support

imir Levin >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thank you for your feedback. My responses are inline below >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 12:24 AM Yoav Weiss >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: contain-intrinsic-size: auto none support

t;> >>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 12:24 AM Yoav Weiss >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 10:19 PM 'Vladimir Levin' via blink-dev < >>>> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: >>>> >>>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: contain-intrinsic-size: auto none support

On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 1:12 PM Vladimir Levin wrote: > Thank you for your feedback. My responses are inline below > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 12:24 AM Yoav Weiss > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 10:19 PM 'Vladimir Levin' via blink-dev &

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: contain-intrinsic-size: auto none support

Thank you for your feedback. My responses are inline below On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 12:24 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 10:19 PM 'Vladimir Levin' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Contact emailsvmp...@chromium.org >> &

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: contain-intrinsic-size: auto none support

Contact emailsvmp...@chromium.org SpecificationNone Summary This feature extends the existing contain-intrinsic-size syntax: none | | auto && to also include auto && none: none | | auto && | auto && none The reason for this change is the CSSWG resolution (

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: ContentVisibilityAutoStateChanged event

Hi all, CSSWG resolved on renaming this event to be in the present tense: ContentVisibilityAutoStateChangeEvent instead of ContentVisibilityAutoStateChangedEvent (https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7603#issuecomment-1309133575) This is currently in the Beta channel (m108). According to