[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning: allow anchor-size() in inset and margin Properties

2024-10-10 Thread Rune Lillesveen
Contact emailsfuth...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#anchor-size-fn Summary Allow anchor-size() values for inset and margin properties. Originally, anchor-size() was only allowed in sizing properties. The specification was changed to allo

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning: Unwrapped inset-area()

2024-07-03 Thread Anders Hartvoll Ruud
Contact emailsandr...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specification https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#position-try-fallbacks Summary Replaces the inset-area() function with inset-area values directly within position-try-fallbacks. This means that you now just write e.g. position-try-fa

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-05-14 Thread fantasai
On 5/13/24 15:06, 'Mason Freed' via blink-dev wrote: First, I’d just like to correct the record, for the benefit of the folks who have been working for years on this feature (including lots of outreach), and for everyone following this discussion: [...] Mason, I don't contest any of these thin

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-05-13 Thread 'Mason Freed' via blink-dev
First, I’d just like to correct the record, for the benefit of the folks who have been working for years on this feature (including lots of outreach), and for everyone following this discussion: - This feature has been in development since May, 2022

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-05-13 Thread Alan Stearns
Mason, Chris, (speaking as the CSSWG co-chair) Please prioritize responding to each of these issues. Thanks, Alan On Sunday, May 12, 2024 at 7:47:08 PM UTC-7 fantasa...@inkedblade.net wrote: > On 4/15/24 01:55, fantasai wrote: > > Speaking for myself only (not as Apple/WebKit), as an individ

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-05-13 Thread Mike Taylor
On 5/12/24 10:30 PM, fantasai wrote: On 5/2/24 16:43, Mason Freed wrote: I think it’s a bit unfair to call this “shipping the first draft”. I didn't call it one. Your responses in this thread are often not to what I've actually been writing. Please be less sloppy in your reading, it's kindo

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-05-12 Thread fantasai
On 4/15/24 01:55, fantasai wrote: Speaking for myself only (not as Apple/WebKit), as an individual co-editor of this spec--and from the perspective of having edited many layout specs including Grid and Flexbox--I think Anchor Positioning is not quite ready to ship (though I think it's pretty cl

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-05-12 Thread fantasai
On 5/2/24 16:43, Mason Freed wrote: On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 10:04 AM fantasai wrote: 1. The *revised design* should get feedback *from authors*. For example by: 1. Shipping your revised implementation in test builds so devs can try them out/and/ 2. Posting abo

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-05-03 Thread Mason Freed
I'd just like to reiterate that we are open to making well-justified changes to the API shape over the next few months, as concerns arise. I think that the fact that we're shipping this API makes us *more* (not less) likely to *a)* surface the need for these changes, and *b)* prioritize them approp

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-05-02 Thread Florian Rivoal
On 2024/05/03 5:43, Mason Freed wrote: I stand by what I said - we will definitely be open to well-justified changes after we ship! More inline below. Despite the best intents, the "well-justified" part of this is going to be a very quickly raising bar. The same intent was declared [1] abo

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-05-02 Thread Mason Freed
On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 10:04 AM fantasai wrote: > On 4/16/24 09:57, Mason Freed wrote: > > One thing to note is that we’re very committed to addressing any open > issues, either now or after additional issues are discovered. > > You won't be as open to change after you ship, though, because then

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-05-01 Thread fantasai
On 4/16/24 09:57, Mason Freed wrote: Thanks for the detailed reply, fantasai! And also thank you very much for all of the hard work you and Tab have put into this feature to make it what it is. We very much appreciate it. And I appreciate all the hard work the Chrome Team has put into implemen

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-04-17 Thread Mason Freed
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 6:00 PM Domenic Denicola wrote: > Mason, can you confirm that what is shipping is accurately represented by > the specification field, i.e., CSS anchor positioning only? In particular, > the HTML anchor="" attribute is > not inclu

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-04-16 Thread Domenic Denicola
Mason, can you confirm that what is shipping is accurately represented by the specification field, i.e., CSS anchor positioning only? In particular, the HTML anchor="" attribute is not included in this I2S? On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 5:01 AM Daniel Herr wro

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-04-16 Thread Mason Freed
Thank you all! I really appreciate the feedback and support. Thanks, Mason On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 12:05 PM Rick Byers wrote: > LGTM3 > > There's definitely some forward compat risk here, but we know adoption for > these sorts of features tends to be slow before reaching all engines, so > I'm

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-04-16 Thread Rick Byers
LGTM3 There's definitely some forward compat risk here, but we know adoption for these sorts of features tends to be slow before reaching all engines, so I'm confident in our ability to make small breaking changes as needed as the spec continues to mature. Seeing how much diligence and review has

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-04-16 Thread Alex Russell
LGTM1. Excited to see this ship! On Monday, April 15, 2024 at 5:57:40 PM UTC-7 Mason Freed wrote: > Thanks for the detailed reply, fantasai! And also thank you very much for > all of the hard work you and Tab have put into this feature to make it what > it is. We very much appreciate it. > > Mo

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-04-15 Thread Mason Freed
Thanks for the detailed reply, fantasai! And also thank you very much for all of the hard work you and Tab have put into this feature to make it what it is. We very much appreciate it. More inline: On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 10:56 PM fantasai wrote: > Speaking for myself only (not as Apple/WebKit)

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-04-14 Thread fantasai
Speaking for myself only (not as Apple/WebKit), as an individual co-editor of this spec--and from the perspective of having edited many layout specs including Grid and Flexbox--I think Anchor Positioning is not quite ready to ship (though I think it's pretty close). The spec just went through

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-04-11 Thread Mason Freed
Contact emails *mas...@chromium.org *Explainer *https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/main/CSSAnchoredPositioning/explainer.md https://xiaochengh.github.io/Explainers/css-anchor-po