Re: [Bloat] different speeds on different ports? (benchmarking fun)

2017-09-22 Thread Aaron Wood
so you’re at the mercy of TCP >>> receive windows and latency limiting how fast you can go on that single >>> stream. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Bloat [mailto:bloat-boun...@lists.bufferbloat.net] *On Behalf >>> Of *Aaron Wood >>> *Sent:* Tue

Re: [Bloat] different speeds on different ports? (benchmarking fun)

2017-09-21 Thread David Lang
On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: It would be interesting if we could run some netperf tests using port 80/443 for the listening socket for the data connection (although if doing deep-packet inspection, we might need to use an actual HTTP transfer). Trouble with this is that

Re: [Bloat] different speeds on different ports? (benchmarking fun)

2017-09-21 Thread Aaron Wood
t [mailto:bloat-boun...@lists.bufferbloat.net] *On Behalf Of >> *Aaron Wood >> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 29, 2017 11:16 PM >> *To:* bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> >> *Subject:* [Bloat] different speeds on different ports? (benchmarking >> fun) >> &g

Re: [Bloat] different speeds on different ports? (benchmarking fun)

2017-09-21 Thread Aaron Wood
-boun...@lists.bufferbloat.net] *On Behalf Of > *Aaron > Wood > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 29, 2017 11:16 PM > *To:* bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> > *Subject:* [Bloat] different speeds on different ports? (benchmarking fun) > > > > I don't have a full writeup yet, b

Re: [Bloat] different speeds on different ports? (benchmarking fun)

2017-09-21 Thread Colin Dearborn
...@lists.bufferbloat.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Wood Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 11:16 PM To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> Subject: [Bloat] different speeds on different ports? (benchmarking fun) I don't have a full writeup yet, but wanted to ask if people on here have run into this. I'm seeing a dis

Re: [Bloat] different speeds on different ports? (benchmarking fun)

2017-09-21 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Toke, Stefan, Aaron, > On Sep 21, 2017, at 13:16, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > >> It would be interesting if we could run some netperf tests using port >> 80/443 for the listening socket for the data connection (although if >> doing deep-packet inspection, we might need to

Re: [Bloat] different speeds on different ports? (benchmarking fun)

2017-09-21 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
> It would be interesting if we could run some netperf tests using port > 80/443 for the listening socket for the data connection (although if > doing deep-packet inspection, we might need to use an actual HTTP > transfer). Trouble with this is that netserver would have to run as root to be able

Re: [Bloat] different speeds on different ports? (benchmarking fun)

2017-09-21 Thread Stefan Alfredsson
On 2017-08-30 07:15, Aaron Wood wrote: The current hypothesis that we have is that this is due to either traffic class, or the ports that traffic are running on.  I've ruled out the ping streams, as a parallel set of netperf tcp_maerts downloads has the same 120Mbps roof. Also think of

Re: [Bloat] different speeds on different ports? (benchmarking fun)

2017-09-20 Thread Dave Taht
A packet capture from dslreports might be useful also. ___ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat