Hello Florian,
Le Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:52:55 +0200,
Florian Effenberger a écrit :
> Hi Charles,
>
> Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-03-23 18.04:
>
> > Voilà. SC members, feel free to vote again, or shout (but for the
> > very last time).
>
> thanks a lot for managing this, and for your patien
Hi Charles,
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-03-23 18.04:
Voilà. SC members, feel free to vote again, or shout (but for the very
last time).
thanks a lot for managing this, and for your patience. +1 to the policy.
Just one small thing: Legally, marks do currently *not* belong to TDF,
as TDF
Hi,
Original-Nachricht
> Von: "Charles-H. Schulz"
>
> So I have replaced trademarks by marks, as well as modified the text
> according to some of your corrections above (not all of them). I'd like
> to call for a vote (the final one) starting now until Tuesday at noon
> Founda
Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> So I have replaced trademarks by marks, as well as modified the text
> according to some of your corrections above (not all of them). I'd like
> to call for a vote (the final one) starting now until Tuesday at noon
> Foundation time.
>
Looks perfect to me, thanks a lot -
Hi all,
On 27/03/2011 16:58, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Hello,
[...]So I have replaced trademarks by marks, as well as modified the text
according to some of your corrections above (not all of them). I'd like
to call for a vote (the final one) starting now until Tuesday at noon
Foundation time.
Le Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:13:59 +0200,
Italo Vignoli a écrit :
> On 3/28/11 6:06 PM, Caolan McNamara wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 15:58 +0200, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> >> So I have replaced trademarks by marks, as well as modified the
> >> text according to some of your corrections above (not
On 3/28/11 6:06 PM, Caolan McNamara wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 15:58 +0200, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
So I have replaced trademarks by marks, as well as modified the text
according to some of your corrections above (not all of them). I'd like
to call for a vote (the final one) starting now unti
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 15:58 +0200, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> So I have replaced trademarks by marks, as well as modified the text
> according to some of your corrections above (not all of them). I'd like
> to call for a vote (the final one) starting now until Tuesday at noon
> Foundation time.
Le
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 15:58 +0200, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> So I have replaced trademarks by marks, as well as modified the text
> according to some of your corrections above (not all of them). I'd like
> to call for a vote (the final one) starting now until Tuesday at noon
> Foundation time.
Hi Charles,
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 18:04 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> I have thus taken Michael's input and adapted it to our existing
> proposal. In substance, the TM policy itself *hasn't changed* I simply
> added one more link in the text to our logo guideline.
Looks good; we still
Hello Bernhard,
Le Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:49:04 +0100 (CET),
"Bernhard Dippold" a écrit :
> Hi Charles, all
>
> while I'm fine with the TM policy, I think there should be one more
> case mentioned in the logo policy:
>
> Charles M. Schultz wrote
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > that's hopefully the la
Hi Charles, all
while I'm fine with the TM policy, I think there should be one more
case mentioned in the logo policy:
Charles M. Schultz wrote
> Hi there,
>
> that's hopefully the last time we do this.
When you keep your eye on the Trademark policy, voting should be possible...
> [...]
>
Hi there,
that's hopefully the last time we do this.
After some discussion here and there it became clear that Mike's latest
proposal (insert some text and keep the existing policies) was the
easiest and the best one.
I have thus taken Michael's input and adapted it to our existing
proposal. In
Hi guys,
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 16:56 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> > general (and I think we do) does the TDF subline and the TDF trademark
> > need a specific, more restrictive trademark policy OR does the TM
> > already cover its usage?
>
> It is indeed a bit confusing. In the beginning, w
Hi Charles,
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-03-11 14.34:
there's no more formal running vote. We're discussing on what to do
with respect to the TDF trademark itself and the TDF subline. My last
post was asking the following question: If we agree on the TM policy in
I agree, and thanks a lot f
Hi,
Le Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:18:31 +0100,
Florian Effenberger a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> sorry for stepping in so late on this, the last days have been a bit
> busy with off-TDF things. :-)
>
> I've lost plot a bit: Is there a formal vote running now, or do we
> need to clarify the situation with rega
Hi,
sorry for stepping in so late on this, the last days have been a bit
busy with off-TDF things. :-)
I've lost plot a bit: Is there a formal vote running now, or do we need
to clarify the situation with regards to the TDF tagline?
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger
Steering Committee and Fo
Hi,
I turned this discussion inside out in my mind, and I think that we can
perhaps work it out if we ask a different question.
We all agree on the TM policy itself (we do, I think). There is but one
detail concerning the use of the TDF subline in a logo that is understood as
somewhat different (o
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
> As you should vote on the Trademark Policy, perhaps it would be
> reasonable to leave the Logo Policy (having less legal weight IMHO)
> aside for the moment.
>
Hi Bernhard, all,
well maybe - but maybe we should beforehand try to reach mutual
agreement on what we want to
Hi Michael, Charles, all,
please let me describe how I think it is meant - probably we need to
rephrase the Logo policy (but not the Trademark Policy).
As you should vote on the Trademark Policy, perhaps it would be
reasonable to leave the Logo Policy (having less legal weight IMHO)
aside fo
Hello Michael,
Le Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:57:10 +,
Michael Meeks a écrit :
> Hi Charles,
>
> On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 16:42 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> > I inserted
> > inside the Logo policy page the notion of "substantially
> > unmodified version of LibreOffice" that already exists in
Hi Charles,
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 16:42 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> I inserted
> inside the Logo policy page the notion of "substantially unmodified
> version of LibreOffice" that already exists in the Trademark Policy.
Sure - but the Logo page seems to suggest to me that you
22 matches
Mail list logo
