Re: [board-discuss] Re: In-house developers proposal v 2.1

2022-06-08 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi Michael, I prefer to avoid going into details as people should draw their conclusions by looking at timing and people involved by looking at the ESC meeting minutes and your proposal. On 08/06/2022 10:40, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Paolo, On 08/06/2022 09:18, Paolo Vecchi wrote: That is a c

Re: [board-discuss] Re: In-house developers proposal v 2.1

2022-06-08 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Paolo, On 08/06/2022 09:18, Paolo Vecchi wrote: That is a copy/paste from a text the general manager of a commercial contributor sent the 23/05 It is not the greatest vote of confidence in your position that you critique the source of a counter-proposal rather than the proposal itself: p

Re: [board-discuss] Re: In-house developers proposal v 2.1

2022-06-08 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi all, On 08/06/2022 00:57, Cor Nouws wrote: Hi Paolo, Paolo Vecchi wrote on 08/06/2022 00:31: On 07/06/2022 21:40, Simon Phipps wrote: Kendy made a merged version and shared it with us all... No, once again he took my document and copy/pasted bits of Michael Meeks proposal on it to comp

Re: [board-discuss] Re: In-house developers proposal v 2.1

2022-06-07 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Paolo, Paolo Vecchi wrote on 08/06/2022 00:31: On 07/06/2022 21:40, Simon Phipps wrote: Kendy made a merged version and shared it with us all... No, once again he took my document and copy/pasted bits of Michael Meeks proposal on it to completely change the logic of the proposal. I ass

Re: [board-discuss] Re: In-house developers proposal v 2.1

2022-06-07 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi Simon, On 07/06/2022 21:40, Simon Phipps wrote: Kendy made a merged version and shared it with us all... No, once again he took my document and copy/pasted bits of Michael Meeks proposal on it to completely change the logic of the proposal. That proposal doesn't really fit with the budge

Re: [board-discuss] Re: In-house developers proposal v 2.1

2022-06-07 Thread Simon Phipps
Hi! Thanks for your calm reflections, Michael. On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 3:30 PM Michael Weghorn wrote: > > Looking at the diff between the 2 proposals: While there seem to be > different approaches in some bigger questions (like management, tasks of > developers), some seem to be more of a cosmet