David Abrahams wrote:
MPL's implementation (boost/mpl/aux_/has_xxx.hpp) is
known to work on Comeau, Intel (all versions), MSVC (all versions),
Metroweks 8.3/8.2 and GCC 3.2. There is no known way to make it
work on Borland. You can test it against any other compiler by
trying out
Hi,
Anthony Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
| You made youself clear.
|
| However, there are two running issues originating from a claim of Dave
| that dangerous_cast might be better than reinterpret_cast in
| casting from U* to T* (dangerous_cast uses the intermediate step
Eric Woodruff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
| Thus, given that h.storage is properly aligned, (which is the purpose of
| the
| other union member), after new(h.storage) Foo, h.storage contains a Foo
| object. Thus accessing it through a pointer-to-Foo is legal, as Foo is the
| dynamic type
Aleksey Gurtovoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
MPL's implementation (boost/mpl/aux_/has_xxx.hpp) is
known to work on Comeau, Intel (all versions), MSVC (all versions),
Metroweks 8.3/8.2 and GCC 3.2. There is no known way to make it
work on Borland. You can test it
On Saturday 07 December 2002 06:47 am, John Maddock wrote:
Maybe we need something new for those folks: something like
BOOST_NO_WORKAROUNDS or whatever, that disables all compiler workarounds?
To keep things centralised BOOST_NO_WORKAROUNDS should be defined by the
compiler config when the
From: Douglas Gregor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 07 December 2002 06:47 am, John Maddock wrote:
Maybe we need something new for those folks: something like
BOOST_NO_WORKAROUNDS or whatever, that disables all compiler
workarounds?
[...]
I like it.
Looks reasonable, although I'd prefer
Douglas Gregor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 07 December 2002 06:47 am, John Maddock wrote:
Maybe we need something new for those folks: something like
BOOST_NO_WORKAROUNDS or whatever, that disables all compiler workarounds?
To keep things centralised BOOST_NO_WORKAROUNDS should be
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
That's because the MPL's lambda works only with metafunctions which template
parameters are _types_, and only types:
That's what I suspected.
3) a metafunction with template template parameter, can't be used in lambda
expressions:
Again, what I suspected.
It _is_
On 07 Dec 2002 12:26:35 +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5.2.10/1:
The result of the expression reinterpret_castT(v) is the result of
converting the expression v to type T. [...]
Are you saying you really understand what that phrase means? Can you
explain it, and say please
Gabriel Dos Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Eric Woodruff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
| Thus, given that h.storage is properly aligned, (which is the purpose
of
| the
| other union member), after new(h.storage) Foo, h.storage
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev i meddelandet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Johan Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[cross-posted, but it seemed appropriate]
Hi,
just wanted to bring this one up: I've come across some problems putting
boost source to an OpenVMS
On Sat, 07 Dec 2002 17:16:42 +0100, Gennaro Prota
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07 Dec 2002 12:26:35 +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5.2.10/1:
The result of the expression reinterpret_castT(v) is the result of
converting the expression v to type T. [...]
Are you saying you
Peter Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like it.
I don't (yet). Why do we need yet another macro which means turn off
the workarounds? Would BOOST_STRICT_CONFIG then be obsolete?
I think that the idea is that BOOST_STRICT_CONFIG applies only to
Gennaro Prota [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
| Well, in fact those subsequent paragraphs intentionally give very few
| guarantee, and reinterpret_castvoid* is exactly one of the cases
| which are left unspecified (the guarantee of 5.2.10/7 concerns casting
| to pointers to *object types*). So I
--- Gabriel Dos Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gennaro Prota [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
| Well, in fact those subsequent paragraphs intentionally give very few
| guarantee, and reinterpret_castvoid* is exactly one of the cases
| which are left unspecified (the guarantee of 5.2.10/7
John Maddock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If this fails to compile, we may need to add a dummy return 0; at
the end. I know of two compilers which act this way: Metrowerks and
HP.
What do you want to call it?
I'm not happy with it, but...
BOOST_NO_NON_RETURN_PATH_COMPREHENSION is the best I
Gennaro Prota [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| --- Gabriel Dos Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Gennaro Prota [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| [...]
|
| | Well, in fact those subsequent paragraphs intentionally give very few
| | guarantee, and reinterpret_castvoid* is exactly one of the cases
| |
My summary of the Apache license is now available at
http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Boost_License/Apache_Software_License
Reminder: If you haven't done one yet, please take a moment to review
one of the licenses at
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My summary of the Apple Public Source license is now available at
http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Boost_License/Apple_Public_Source_License
Reminder: If you haven't done one yet, please take a moment to review
one of the
From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Maddock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If this fails to compile, we may need to add a dummy return 0; at
the end. I know of two compilers which act this way: Metrowerks and
HP.
What do you want to call it?
I'm not happy with it, but...
Jeff Garland wrote:
Point taken. I could probably try to do the same as sourceforge.
Put the Wiki data backup in a public place that others could
copy down on a daily basis -- you for example :-)
I've started running my boost backup script.
Could you let me know the URL when you've got the
Mark Rodgers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Maddock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If this fails to compile, we may need to add a dummy return 0; at
the end. I know of two compilers which act this way: Metrowerks and
HP.
What do you want to call it?
22 matches
Mail list logo
