Hi All!
I'm tuning the tests for the numeric conversions library I will hopefully
have ready for formal review sometime this month.
While doing that I run into the following:
My tests are already arranged in a way that 'test/minimal.hpp' offers too
little functionality while a whole test framewo
> My tests are already arranged in a way that 'test/minimal.hpp' offers too
> little functionality while a whole test framework, such as
> test_execution_monitor or unit_test_framework requires me link or
> include too many translation units.
Well currently Boost.Test propose three configuration:
- Original Message -
From: "Rozental, Gennadiy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:17 AM
Subject: RE: [boost] Factoring out Test Library wrapstrstream
> > My tests are already arranged in a way that 'test/m
> (3) fully included
> The problem with this is that I put the burden of doing so to
> the user.
I do not get it. In this case you are the user (of Boost.Test library). To
use fully included version you are using
#include
And that's it. No need for linking.
> I could use jamfiles, but jam bui
- Original Message -
From: "Rozental, Gennadiy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Boost mailing list'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7:13 PM
Subject: RE: [boost] Factoring out Test Library wrapstrstream
> > (3) fully incl
> > #include
> >
> All right... I totally missed this...
> I thought 'fully included' meant something else. Sorry.
> (btw: I couldn't find this on the Docs... perhaps it's just me)
See here for example:
http://www.boost.org/libs/test/doc/test_exec_monitor.htm#MonitorCompilation
>
> NOTE:
> I tr
- Original Message -
From: "Rozental, Gennadiy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Boost mailing list'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:37 PM
Subject: RE: [boost] Factoring out Test Library wrapstrstream
> > > #in
> The problem is that BCC, by default, uses an 'intrinsic'
> version of strcmp
> which is not a real function thus it is not located in std.
> Declaring strcmp
> inside std doesn't help.
> The workaround is to either use unqualified calls to strcmp
> or to disable
> its intrinsic version. My pat
- Original Message -
From: "Rozental, Gennadiy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Boost mailing list'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 3:01 PM
Subject: RE: [boost] Factoring out Test Library wrapstrstream
> > The pro
