On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 03:57:33PM -0800, Ranga Nathan wrote:
> I re-installed the module from
> http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/A/AN/ANDK/CPAN-1.76_65.tar.gz and
> the install went OK.
> When I first installed, I might not have set up the FTP servers correctly.
> So this time, it did
I re-installed the module from
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/A/AN/ANDK/CPAN-1.76_65.tar.gz and
the install went OK.
When I first installed, I might not have set up the FTP servers correctly.
So this time, it did not walk me through that dialogue.
I think the re-install is still using
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 03:27:00PM -0800, Ranga Nathan wrote:
> I am not sure what I did, the CPAN module is broken on one of my SuSE
> servers. I am not sure how I got here. I reinstalled the module but
> problem persists.
Is it CPAN.pm with problems, or libwww? Did you try installing the
I am not sure what I did, the CPAN module is broken on one of my SuSE
servers. I am not sure how I got here. I reinstalled the module but
problem persists.
--
This will cause `make test' to be quite a bit
Ugliness:
Instead of using the modules, your pluggable system could read the module
into a scalar, prepended with 'use strict;' and eval that. Of course you'd
have to scan the code for and remove 'no strict;' as well, and be sure that
the author didn't really need it. But what if they: 'no strict
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 08:44:41AM -0800, Carl Eklof wrote:
> Does anybody know of a way to enforce 'use strict' on
> the packages used in a script?
Acme::Code::Police :-)
--
David Cantrell | Benevolent Dictator Of The World
For every vengeance, there is an equal and opposite revengeance.
Hello,
Does anybody know of a way to enforce 'use strict' on
the packages used in a script?
I am building a sizable application, with plug-able
modules (packages) written in perl. I'd like to
enforce 'use strict' on the included modules, without
depending on users to put 'use strict' below each
Touche on the negative, the foo on the other hand is open to interpretation.
I personally don't the question as "matches only" although I suppose this may
be inferred from the use of ^
--
H4sICNoBwDoAA3NpZwA9jbsNwDAIRHumuC4NklvXTOD0KSJEnwU8fHz4Q8M9i3sGzkS7BBrm
On 11/14/05, Jerrad Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This can be said of many such tests. I'd just like to point out that your
> last example, isn't. there is, *strictly speaking* only one correct answer.
Actually there are none. There is merely a "lease incorrect" answer.
> > Which one of
This can be said of many such tests. I'd just like to point out that your
last example, isn't. there is, *strictly speaking* only one correct answer.
> Which one of the following regular expressions matches lines beginning
> with an integer followed by a period and a space?
> Choice 1
Taking advantage of the Brainbench free test period, I've taken a bunch
of their tests lately. Although I've scored well I've found the tests to
be somewhat frustrating as a bunch of questions on each test seem to be
flawed.
There are a couple of reoccurring patterns: questions where you are
FYI, for those interested in certification...
Perlcast 13[1] (from back in June) makes mention of a new vendor
offering a Perl certification test (60 questions, 2 hours), which links
to high-levelcert.com. Apparently they didn't last long, as the site
appears to be dead at the moment (what's
12 matches
Mail list logo
