Re: The US in Sudan

2006-08-07 Thread Richard Baker
JDG said: Only conspicious because you defined troops as including only military personnel, and not including *police* personnel. So is your thesis that genocide is a criminal problem whereas, say, terrorism is a military problem? (I also note that there are vastly more military than

RE: Once more into the 9-11 breach

2006-08-07 Thread Horn, John
On Behalf Of Gibson Jonathan One thing nobody in this conversation has taken up is the amazing amount of damage to the interior lobby area. Firemen teams who arrived found scores of injured in the ruined lobby {not dead smooshed people having jumped to their death outside}. Here's

RE: What MDW are?

2006-08-07 Thread Horn, John
On Behalf Of Robert Seeberger - Original Message - From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] Correct the header. :-) Modernized now. Yoda-ized the header. - jmh CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended

Re: The US in Sudan

2006-08-07 Thread jdiebremse
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JDG said: Only conspicious because you defined troops as including only military personnel, and not including *police* personnel. So is your thesis that genocide is a criminal problem whereas, say, terrorism is a

Re: The US in Sudan

2006-08-07 Thread Richard Baker
JDG said: Obviously, my response was much more extensive than the selection you quoted. While snipping quoted text is to be encouraged, snipping quoted text as means of misrepresenting the original argument is dirty pool. I don't see how I can be accused of selective quoting when in the

RE: Wealthy couples travel to U.S. to choose baby's sex

2006-08-07 Thread Deborah Harrell
Dan Minette wrote: Behalf Of Deborah Harrell Dan some snippage grin And I was refusing to have my pro-choice stance deny _any_ protection to the unborn (teratogens etc.) OK, fine. Then the question on the table should be who is a protected person being and what is not. As your

RE: The US in Sudan

2006-08-07 Thread Dan Minette
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Baker Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 1:38 AM To: Killer Bs Discussion Subject: Re: The US in Sudan JDG said: Only conspicious because you defined troops as including only military

Re: The US in Sudan

2006-08-07 Thread jdiebremse
Excellent post, Dan.Two ancillary comments. --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You see that it's mostly small countries that provide troops. I'm guessing, by Bangladesh leading the list, that the troops are paid by the UN, not sponsored by their own

Re: The US in Sudan

2006-08-07 Thread jdiebremse
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Obviously, my response was much more extensive than the selection you quoted. While snipping quoted text is to be encouraged, snipping quoted text as means of misrepresenting the original argument is dirty pool. I don't