wonderful dream, max, but could you smole a pipe on a
zeppelin; would they be hydrogen or helium? how would
you avoid another hindenberg?
jlm
Luxury Zeppelins. I think it's high time we had nice
luxury zeppelin
travel. Floating 5-star bars in the sky with ample
leg room and good
views. No
At 10:21 PM Tuesday 5/8/2007, Max Battcher wrote:
jon louis mann wrote:
Actually, I'm to blame for that . . .
Catapults?
Luxury Zeppelins. I think it's high time we had nice luxury zeppelin
travel. Floating 5-star bars in the sky with ample leg room and good
views. No airports, no TSA,
So what about all of the packages and people
that (in the words of the commercial)
absolutely, positively, have to be there by 9 AM?
-- Ronn! :)
for the present, those people have to be satisfied,
but some day, in the not too distant furure, it will
no longer be realistic to ship freight
On 0, jon louis mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled:
wonderful dream, max, but could you smole a pipe on a
zeppelin; would they be hydrogen or helium? how would
you avoid another hindenberg?
jlm
As I recall, wasn't the Hindenburg disaster due to the flammable paint and a
known design flaw
wonderful dream, max, but could you smoke a pipe on
a zeppelin; would hydrogen or helium be used? how
would you avoid another hindenburg?
jlm
As I recall, wasn't the Hindenburg disaster due to the
flammable paint and a known design flaw which allowed
the buildup of static electricity? I have
Gwern Branwen wrote:
As I recall, wasn't the Hindenburg disaster due to the flammable
paint and a known design flaw which allowed the buildup of static
electricity? I have little doubt we could do better today.
Helium could be used instead of Hydrogen. If cost is the problem,
then use
Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
At 05:11 PM Tuesday 5/8/2007, Julia Thompson wrote:
IOW, the dose makes the poison?
Water in excess is toxic.
Which just supports my statement. :)
Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
As Steve said,
The Brin-L weekly chat has been a list tradition for over six
years. Way back on 27 May, 1998, Marco Maisenhelder first set
up a chatroom for the list, and on the next day, he established
a weekly chat time. We've been through several servers, chat
technologies, and even casts of
Helium could be used instead of Hydrogen. If cost is
the problem, then use Methane.
Alberto Monteiro, who can't count.
lots of methane in new zealand - 70m sheep, each
emitting a barrel a day here is another source:
http://www.ciesin.org/TG/AG/ricecult.html
jlm
On 5/9/07, Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gwern Branwen wrote:
As I recall, wasn't the Hindenburg disaster due to the flammable
paint and a known design flaw which allowed the buildup of static
electricity? I have little doubt we could do better today.
Helium could be used
On 5/9/07, jon louis mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what about all of the packages — and people —
that (in the words of the commercial)
absolutely, positively, have to be there by 9 AM?
-- Ronn! :)
for the present, those people have to be satisfied,
but some day, in the not too distant
Max Battcher wrote:
On 5/9/07, jon louis mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what about all of the packages — and people —
that (in the words of the commercial)
absolutely, positively, have to be there by 9 AM?
-- Ronn! :)
for the present, those people have to be satisfied,
but some day, in
12 matches
Mail list logo
