On 18/04/2008, at 7:16 AM, hkhenson wrote:
At 12:00 PM 4/17/2008, Dan M wrote:
Nothing works 100% of the time, but lets assume a 95% efficiency,
or running
8322 hours/year. The cost is, then, about $39 per kWh.
If you do it this way, the cost the next year is zero. That's not
good
In the past few days, since I've become aware of this site, I've been
reading it avidly - with horror. No idea who funds these guys, but it's
clear they're not the good guys. Check it out if you dare :
http://www.junkscience.com/
Their beliefs are primarily centred around
On Apr 18, 2008, at 6:08 PM, Curtis Burisch wrote:
In the past few days, since I've become aware of this site, I've been
reading it avidly - with horror. No idea who funds these guys, but
it's
clear they're not the good guys.
The site is registered to Steven Milloy:
