Dave Land wrote:
On Nov 30, 2005, at 11:30 AM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
The only problem with that suggestion is that it's people who feel
like you do who believe in gun control, while it's the conservatives
and the Christians who have all the firearms . . . :P
Not all Christians are
Dave Land wrote:
On Nov 29, 2005, at 8:32 PM, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
The problem is that a lot of innocent people will suffer and die in
the process. I guess that's why I vacillate between disgust and
intolerance for such idiots, but never anything like a quiet shrug.
So on my good days
At 10:32 PM Tuesday 11/29/2005, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
On Nov 26, 2005, at 11:51 PM, Dave Land wrote:
On Nov 26, 2005, at 9:47 PM, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
On Nov 21, 2005, at 2:05 PM, David Brin wrote:
Two very strong points. Though please remember there
are some honest and intelligent
On Nov 30, 2005, at 11:30 AM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
The only problem with that suggestion is that it's people who feel
like you do who believe in gun control, while it's the
conservatives and the Christians who have all the firearms . . . :P
Not all Christians are fundamentalists.
On Nov 26, 2005, at 11:51 PM, Dave Land wrote:
On Nov 26, 2005, at 9:47 PM, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
On Nov 21, 2005, at 2:05 PM, David Brin wrote:
Two very strong points. Though please remember there
are some honest and intelligent Republicans. I even
know a few.
FWIW, my state has
From: Warren Ockrassa
Probably I'm confusing correlation with causation again. It
does happen to me from time to time. Maybe a better
formulation is that those who are vicious, money-grubbing
bastard Republicans who weep crocodile tears *after* getting
caught (as opposed to those who
On Nov 29, 2005, at 8:32 PM, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
On Nov 26, 2005, at 11:51 PM, Dave Land wrote:
On Nov 26, 2005, at 9:47 PM, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
On Nov 21, 2005, at 2:05 PM, David Brin wrote:
Two very strong points. Though please remember there
are some honest and intelligent
Warren Ockrassa wrote:
On Nov 21, 2005, at 2:05 PM, David Brin wrote:
Two very strong points. Though please remember there
are some honest and intelligent Republicans. I even
know a few.
FWIW, my state has McCain, and my stepfather is without question one of
the most upstanding men I've
--- Warren Ockrassa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are a few, but they're the ones who have not
been polluted by religion.
This is unfortunate.
The churches and the military were allies with
liberalism in fighting for civil rights. Many
religious people are also progressive. e.g. Jimmy
On Nov 21, 2005, at 2:05 PM, David Brin wrote:
Two very strong points. Though please remember there
are some honest and intelligent Republicans. I even
know a few.
FWIW, my state has McCain, and my stepfather is without question one of
the most upstanding men I've ever known — and as a
On Nov 26, 2005, at 9:47 PM, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
On Nov 21, 2005, at 2:05 PM, David Brin wrote:
Two very strong points. Though please remember there
are some honest and intelligent Republicans. I even
know a few.
FWIW, my state has McCain, and my stepfather is without question
one
Yes.
Dr Brin, why exactly do we need to develop AI's that are self aware at
all? Their are certain problems that can be avoided entirely by
keeping technology smart enough to do it's job, but not smart enough to
think for itself. As you say the only way would be to raise them as if
they were
On Nov 21, 2005, at 6:07 AM, The Fool wrote:
As for Nonos, it seems like a lot of the nano tech you describe would
likely need an immune system to fight off regular pathogens,
engineereed
malicious pathogens and nanotech, and badly designed / escaped /
evolving nanotech.
Enter nanospam:
Two very strong points. Though please remember there
are some honest and intelligent Republicans. I even
know a few.
--- The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes.
Dr Brin, why exactly do we need to develop AI's that
are self aware at
all? Their are certain problems that can be avoided
14 matches
Mail list logo
