http://www.fsffrance.org/news/article2005-11-25.en.html
Friday November 18th, 2005, French Department of Culture. SNEP and SCPP
have told Free Software authors: You will be required to change your
licenses. SACEM add: You shall stop publishing free software, and
warn they are ready to sue free
I'm not filtering anymore. I've reviewed recent posts in the archives, and
I think I'll be fine for now.
Michael Harney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Michael Harney wrote:
I'm not filtering anymore. I've reviewed recent posts
in the archives, and I think I'll be fine for now.
As fair warning, my last post did have a question about the
best organizations for protecting wildlife, but I'm hoping
any thread that comes out of my question
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Filtering
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 09:16:08 -0600
I am sincere about not wanting to offend anybody to the extent that they
leave the list.
However, I
I just reviewed the archives back from the day I started filtering (I am
recieving only OT and BRIN posts). I was only interested in seeing if
someone had solved the riddle, but noticed several replies to my Filtering
post. I realize that my request that noone post on environmentalist
At 03:23 PM 12/28/03, Michael Harney wrote:
I just reviewed the archives back from the day I started filtering (I am
recieving only OT and BRIN posts). I was only interested in seeing if
someone had solved the riddle, but noticed several replies to my Filtering
post. I realize that my request
Doug Pensinger wrote:
With all due respect, if we stopped talking about everything that makes
someone upset, we may as well shut down the list because we wouldn't even
be able to discuss the weather.
What do you mean by discuss the weather? I feel highly offended
when you all start talking
At 06:45 AM 12/22/2003, you wrote:
Doug Pensinger wrote:
With all due respect, if we stopped talking about everything that makes
someone upset, we may as well shut down the list because we wouldn't even
be able to discuss the weather.
What do you mean by discuss the weather? I feel highly
Alberto Monteiro wrote:
Doug Pensinger wrote:
With all due respect, if we stopped talking about everything that makes
someone upset, we may as well shut down the list because we wouldn't even
be able to discuss the weather.
What do you mean by discuss the weather? I feel highly
Julia Thompson wrote:
What do you mean by discuss the weather? I feel highly offended
when you all start talking about snow in Christmas, and I have 41 deg
in the termometer!
41? You lucky dog -- I only have 18[1]. (No snow here either.)
The minimum in Texas is 18? Even here we have some
- Original Message -
From: Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: Filtering
Julia Thompson wrote:
What do you mean by discuss the weather? I feel highly offended
when you all start
I'm filtering once again. I have lots of things to do to prepare for
Christmas, so I don't have the time to participate. Additionally, with the
increasing posts re: environmentalism, my mind is going in directions that I
don't want it to go. I should have known that my requesting that topics I
At 12:20 PM 12/21/03, Michael Harney wrote:
I'm filtering once again. I have lots of things to do to prepare for
Christmas, so I don't have the time to participate. Additionally, with the
increasing posts re: environmentalism, my mind is going in directions that I
don't want it to go. I should
- Original Message -
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: Filtering
At 12:20 PM 12/21/03, Michael Harney wrote:
I'm filtering once again. I have lots of things to do to prepare
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Filtering
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:34:57 -0600
What does the rest of the list think? Should we avoid environmental topics
entirely from now
From: Robert Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Filtering
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 13:00:31 -0600
No.
With all respect to Michael and his sensitivity to various issues, I think
At 12:34 PM 12/21/2003 -0600 Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
What does the rest of the list think? Should we avoid environmental topics
entirely from now on, or what? I sure don't to offend anyone or cause
anyone to leave the list.
Full Disclosure:I have seen neither Michael's requests to avaoid
Ronn! wrote:
What does the rest of the list think? Should we avoid environmental
topics entirely from now on, or what? I sure don't to offend anyone or
cause anyone to leave the list.
With all due respect, if we stopped talking about everything that makes
someone upset, we may as well shut
Doug Pensinger wrote:
Ronn! wrote:
What does the rest of the list think? Should we avoid environmental
topics entirely from now on, or what? I sure don't to offend anyone or
cause anyone to leave the list.
With all due respect, if we stopped talking about everything that makes
or not. In any
event, filtering is one of the worst things about Outlook. The wizard is
dumb, the UI for building a filter is confusing, there's no language behind
it, so you can't script filters (unless you dive into VB, I guess) and worst
of all (and really, really awful) is the fact that all your filters
if Outlook Express does filters the same way or not. In
any event, filtering is one of the worst things about Outlook. The
I use Pegasus Mail. It's got a fairly robust and easy-to-use rules-based
filtering feature, which has a basic but functional GUI to help you.
Personally, I just delete
Horn, John wrote:
Pegasus Mail v4.0 has an option that claims to be able to pull apart a
digest into its individual pieces. I've never tried it as I receive
individual messages. But that's a possibility.
Entourage also has the option of bursting digests into individual emails,
but I have
as to how filtering the digests might be
accomplished effectively?
No, I don't, at least, not what you seem to want. I've always thought
that individual emails are the best way to get an email list for a
number of reasons:
1) timeliness
2) easy of replying (the information is all
Erik Reuter wrote:
I've always thought
that individual emails are the best way to get an email list for a
number of reasons:
Me too.
I only get lists using digest when the list allows attachments or html
messages that carry spam, and the digests filter them [Yahoogroup
lists that allow
been having? Digest users, by
definition, cannot filter their messages from the list. Do you have any
suggestions as to how filtering the digests might be accomplished
effectively? I'd much prefer to receive my listmail that way, but have been
forced to receive a flood of individual mails
25 matches
Mail list logo
