Re: Harry Potter - no actual spoiler, just a complaint

2005-08-05 Thread William T Goodall
On 26 Jul 2005, at 11:18 am, William T Goodall wrote: On 17 Jul 2005, at 3:45 am, Max Battcher wrote: Julia Thompson wrote: THERE IS A MISTAKE ON PAGE 10! At least in the US edition. Was Gautam reading too fast to catch it? :) Julia who is on page 10 The sight/site switch? Jump

Re: Harry Potter - no actual spoiler, just a complaint

2005-07-26 Thread William T Goodall
On 17 Jul 2005, at 3:45 am, Max Battcher wrote: Julia Thompson wrote: THERE IS A MISTAKE ON PAGE 10! At least in the US edition. Was Gautam reading too fast to catch it? :) Julia who is on page 10 The sight/site switch? Jumps off the page, doesn't it? Although I'm of the opinion t

Re: Harry Potter - no actual spoiler, just a complaint

2005-07-19 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Jul 16, 2005, at 5:55 PM, Julia Thompson wrote: THERE IS A MISTAKE ON PAGE 10! At least in the US edition. Yeah. Really weird. Fortunately I didn't see much else, though there seemed to be an inordinate fondness for the word "snog" that perhaps could have been thesaurusized a bit. Oh w

Re: Bad editing (was Re: Harry Potter - no actual spoiler, just a complaint)

2005-07-17 Thread Julia Thompson
Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 11:23 AM Sunday 7/17/2005, Julia Thompson wrote: Jim Sharkey wrote: Julia Thompson wrote: The sight/site switch? Jumps off the page, doesn't it? Yes it does, ! At least, at me! Yes it did. Glaring as heck, and another reason why I think spell-checker can

Re: Bad editing (was Re: Harry Potter - no actual spoiler, just a complaint)

2005-07-17 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 11:23 AM Sunday 7/17/2005, Julia Thompson wrote: Jim Sharkey wrote: Julia Thompson wrote: The sight/site switch? Jumps off the page, doesn't it? Yes it does, ! At least, at me! Yes it did. Glaring as heck, and another reason why I think spell-checker can make folks lazy. I had to fi

Re: Bad editing (was Re: Harry Potter - no actual spoiler, just a complaint)

2005-07-17 Thread Julia Thompson
Jim Sharkey wrote: Julia Thompson wrote: The sight/site switch? Jumps off the page, doesn't it? Yes it does, ! At least, at me! Yes it did. Glaring as heck, and another reason why I think spell-checker can make folks lazy. I had to fix a number of those when I was prepping the transcr

Re: Harry Potter - no actual spoiler, just a complaint

2005-07-17 Thread Julia Thompson
Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 09:45 PM Saturday 7/16/2005, Max Battcher wrote: Julia Thompson wrote: THERE IS A MISTAKE ON PAGE 10! At least in the US edition. Was Gautam reading too fast to catch it? :) Julia who is on page 10 The sight/site switch? Jumps off the page, doesn't it? Alt

Bad editing (was Re: Harry Potter - no actual spoiler, just a complaint)

2005-07-17 Thread Jim Sharkey
Julia Thompson wrote: >> The sight/site switch? Jumps off the page, doesn't it? >Yes it does, ! >At least, at me! Yes it did. Glaring as heck, and another reason why I think spell-checker can make folks lazy. I had to fix a number of those when I was prepping the transcript for the book I to

Re: Harry Potter - no actual spoiler, just a complaint

2005-07-17 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 09:45 PM Saturday 7/16/2005, Max Battcher wrote: Julia Thompson wrote: THERE IS A MISTAKE ON PAGE 10! At least in the US edition. Was Gautam reading too fast to catch it? :) Julia who is on page 10 The sight/site switch? Jumps off the page, doesn't it? Although I'm of the opinion th

Re: Harry Potter - no actual spoiler, just a complaint

2005-07-16 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 12:34 AM Sunday 7/17/2005, Julia Thompson wrote: Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 11:13 PM Saturday 7/16/2005, Gautam Mukunda wrote: --- Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The sight/site switch? Jumps off the page, > doesn't it? > > Yes it does, ! > > At least, at me! > > Julia

Re: Harry Potter - no actual spoiler, just a complaint

2005-07-16 Thread Julia Thompson
Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 11:13 PM Saturday 7/16/2005, Gautam Mukunda wrote: --- Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The sight/site switch? Jumps off the page, > doesn't it? > > Yes it does, ! > > At least, at me! > > Julia Ah, now I see it :-) Good thing she cited it, h

Re: Harry Potter - no actual spoiler, just a complaint

2005-07-16 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 11:13 PM Saturday 7/16/2005, Gautam Mukunda wrote: --- Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The sight/site switch? Jumps off the page, > doesn't it? > > Yes it does, ! > > At least, at me! > > Julia Ah, now I see it :-) Good thing she cited it, huh? Homophony Maru -- R

Re: Harry Potter - no actual spoiler, just a complaint

2005-07-16 Thread Gautam Mukunda
--- Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The sight/site switch? Jumps off the page, > doesn't it? > > Yes it does, ! > > At least, at me! > > Julia Ah, now I see it :-) Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Freedom is not free" http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com ___

Re: Harry Potter - no actual spoiler, just a complaint

2005-07-16 Thread Julia Thompson
Max Battcher wrote: Julia Thompson wrote: THERE IS A MISTAKE ON PAGE 10! At least in the US edition. Was Gautam reading too fast to catch it? :) Julia who is on page 10 The sight/site switch? Jumps off the page, doesn't it? Yes it does, ! At least, at me! Julia ___

Re: Harry Potter - no actual spoiler, just a complaint

2005-07-16 Thread Max Battcher
Julia Thompson wrote: THERE IS A MISTAKE ON PAGE 10! At least in the US edition. Was Gautam reading too fast to catch it? :) Julia who is on page 10 The sight/site switch? Jumps off the page, doesn't it? Although I'm of the opinion that book editors are getting sloppier and sloppier

Re: Harry Potter - no actual spoiler, just a complaint

2005-07-16 Thread Gautam Mukunda
--- Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > THERE IS A MISTAKE ON PAGE 10! > > At least in the US edition. > > Was Gautam reading too fast to catch it? :) > > Julia > > who is on page 10 I just re-read the page and _still_ can't find it, I'm afraid :-( What is it? Unless Fudge m

Re: Harry Potter - no actual spoiler, just a complaint

2005-07-16 Thread Maru Dubshinki
On 7/16/05, Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > THERE IS A MISTAKE ON PAGE 10! > > At least in the US edition. > > Was Gautam reading too fast to catch it? :) > > Julia > > who is on page 10 Is it the mention of Brockdale Bridge? No Google hits. ~Maru

Harry Potter - no actual spoiler, just a complaint

2005-07-16 Thread Julia Thompson
THERE IS A MISTAKE ON PAGE 10! At least in the US edition. Was Gautam reading too fast to catch it? :) Julia who is on page 10 ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l