Re: NY Times article on people with Asperger's

David Hobby wrote: > I know Asperger's and other parts of the "autistic spectrum" > have come up here before, so thought some might be interested > in the following. > Answer, but No Cure, for a Social Disorder That Isolates Many > April 29, 2004 > By AMY HARMON > Thousands of adults who have

Re: NY Times article on people with Asperger's

fortunately lost the login that someone created for > > those list members who did not want to register with the > > NY Times. Could someone remind me, and this time I'll save > > it in appropriately titled email? Thanks!) > > Here's the page on bugmenot.co

Re: NY Times

David Hobby wrote: >>Here's the page on bugmenot.com that lists all of the registrations that >>folks (here and elsewhere) have created to bypass the ridiculous forced >>registration for the Gray Lady: > > Cute, but the Brin List one was easier to remember! Evidently n

Re: NY Times

Dave Land wrote: ... > Here's the page on bugmenot.com that lists all of the registrations that > folks (here and elsewhere) have created to bypass the ridiculous forced > registration for the Gray Lady: Cute, but the Brin List one was easier to remember!

Re: NY Times article on people with Asperger's

David Hobby wrote: (I have unfortunately lost the login that someone created for those list members who did not want to register with the NY Times. Could someone remind me, and this time I'll save it in appropriately titled email? Thanks!) Here's the page on bugmenot.com that li

NY Times article on people with Asperger's

I know Asperger's and other parts of the "autistic spectrum" have come up here before, so thought some might be interested in the following. (I have unfortunately lost the login that someone created for those list members who did not want to register with the NY Times. Could

Re: [SPAM] NY Times registration

From: "J. van Baardwijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SPAM] NY Times registration Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 16:20:55 +0100 At 04:21 14-2-2003 -0600, The Fool wrote: Sometimes you can bypass the reg

Re: [SPAM] NY Times registration

At 04:21 14-2-2003 -0600, The Fool wrote: Sometimes you can bypass the registration by replacing 'www.' with 'archive.'. Or you could simply login there by using the member ID and password I got for this list last September. Member ID = brinlist Password = brinlist Jeroen "Community Servic

[SPAM] NY Times registration

SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results -- SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. SPAM: SPAM: Content an

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:17:09PM -0500, Erik Reuter wrote: > Also, over the period from 1888 to 2001, Seigel tabulates that the total > US stock market annualized real return for Republicans was 7.20% but > only 6.48% for Democrats. I don't have GDP data tabulated back to 1888, > so I don't know

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

Debbi wrote: Tiny point: Bambi was a stag. Maybe Kevin found a stag in drag? ;) And I can almost picture Thumper in a pimp hat-and-coat... I think you're confusing Thumper with Bender... Reggie Bautista Futurama On The Brain Maru __

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

Kevin Tarr wrote: > At 06:16 PM 2/7/2003 -0500, you wrote: > >At 03:05 PM 2/7/2003 -0800, you wrote: > >>Tiny point: Bambi was a stag. > >>Maybe Kevin found a stag in drag? ;) > >>And I can almost picture Thumper in a pimp > >>hat-and-coat... > >> > >>GSV Irreverence > > > > > > I can't remember

Re: Economic Performance of Presidents Re: Plus the NY Times Re: TheWashington Post Editorial on Iraq

On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:21:18PM -0500, John D. Giorgis wrote: > By the way, I don't have the numbers handy, but I read today that > Clinton & C0., with his, quote, "expert balance of spending", incrased > discretionary spending at 9% a year during the 90's. Bush, on the > other hand, is keepin

Re: Economic Performance of Presidents Re: Plus the NY Times Re:The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

- Original Message - From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:21 PM Subject: Economic Performance of Presidents Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq > At 11:32 PM 2/6/200

Economic Performance of Presidents Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

At 11:32 PM 2/6/2003 -0600 Dan Minette wrote: >Fair enough. That cash out happened in 98 and 99. I must ask again. What model are you using to predict a "cash out" two years after the capital gains tax cut takes effect? >> This model, however provides no scenario in which capital gains rev

A Scientist Wishes He Was an Economist :) Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

At 02:47 PM 2/6/2003 -0600 Dan Minette wrote: > I randomly selected the past 74 years to obtain the >answer for both the Democrats and the Republicans. I find it highly unlikely that the year 1929 was selected randomly. What was your methodology? JDG _

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

At 06:16 PM 2/7/2003 -0500, you wrote: At 03:05 PM 2/7/2003 -0800, you wrote: > > Kevin Tarr wrote: > > > > > > Time to enjoy a nice venison dinner, > totally produced by me from hoof to table. > > > > Julia replied: > > > > >WOW! You gave birth to Bambi? > > > > >Now I'm *really* impressed! > >

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

At 03:05 PM 2/7/2003 -0800, you wrote: > > Kevin Tarr wrote: > > > > > > Time to enjoy a nice venison dinner, > totally produced by me from hoof to table. > > > > Julia replied: > > > > >WOW! You gave birth to Bambi? > > > > >Now I'm *really* impressed! > > > > Kevin retorted: > > > > No but I to

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

> > Kevin Tarr wrote: > > > > > > Time to enjoy a nice venison dinner, > totally produced by me from hoof to table. > > > > Julia replied: > > > > >WOW! You gave birth to Bambi? > > > > >Now I'm *really* impressed! > > > > Kevin retorted: > > > > No but I took her home and Thumper. Tiny point:

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

At 02:28 PM 2/7/2003 -0600, you wrote: Kevin Tarr wrote: > > > Time to enjoy a nice venison dinner, totally produced by me from hoof > > to table. Julia replied: > >WOW! You gave birth to Bambi? > > > >Now I'm *really* impressed! Kevin retorted: > No but I took her home and Thumper. Juli

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

I wrote: > I haven't seen Thumper here at all, but every time it snows, I see lots of > Thumper tracks in both the front and back yards. And given the amount of > woods and fields around here, I'm really surprised that I've seen no > evidence of Bambi at all. Kevin, have you been exceeding you

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

Reggie Bautista wrote: > > Kevin Tarr wrote: > > > > > Time to enjoy a nice venison dinner, totally produced by me from > >hoof > > > > to table. > > Julia replied: > > > >WOW! You gave birth to Bambi? > > > > > > > >Now I'm *really* impressed! > > Kevin retorted: > > > No but I took her home a

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

Kevin Tarr wrote: > > > Time to enjoy a nice venison dinner, totally produced by me from hoof > > to table. Julia replied: > >WOW! You gave birth to Bambi? > > > >Now I'm *really* impressed! Kevin retorted: > No but I took her home and Thumper. Julia responded: I haven't seen Thumper ver

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

- Original Message - From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 10:17 PM Subject: Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:47:12PM -0600, Dan Minette wrot

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

- Original Message - From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:32 PM Subject: Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq >We find, not surprisingly, that whites do > better than

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

http://www.ucomics.com/boondocks/2003/02/06/ ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

- Original Message - From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 10:01 PM Subject: Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq > > Yes, but by what model?If what you say

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:01:08PM -0500, John D. Giorgis wrote: > Anyhow, my argument is that Clinton managed surpluses in large part > because of a stock market bubble. Previously, JDG wrote: > In 1999, 6% of federal receipts were from capitol gains. i.e. $110bil > out of $1.828 tril. Combini

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

"John D. Giorgis" wrote: > > >> At 10:59 PM 2/5/2003 -0600 Dan Minette wrote: > >> >> Indeed, from 1994 to 1999, capital gains reports under Adjusted Gross > >> >> Income more than tripled in nominal terms. > >> > > >> >That's because there was a capital gains tax cut in '97. It give folks > >a >

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:47:12PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote: > The simulation I did was for the change in the GDP from 1929 to 2002. > During that time period, the Democrats have been in office 40 years, > and the Republicans 34. I took as my base sample, the change in the > GDP from one year to

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

>> At 10:59 PM 2/5/2003 -0600 Dan Minette wrote: >> >> Indeed, from 1994 to 1999, capital gains reports under Adjusted Gross >> >> Income more than tripled in nominal terms. >> > >> >That's because there was a capital gains tax cut in '97. It give folks >a >> >chance to cash in on their capital ga

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

- Original Message - From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 6:34 AM Subject: Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq > On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:59:41PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

- Original Message - From: "Robert J. Chassell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:39 AM Subject: RE: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq > "Jon Gabriel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

RE: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

"Jon Gabriel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A downturn that occurs during a specific party's term is not necessarily an indication that that party's policies are at fault. Yes, it takes time for policies to take effect. Given enough years, it seems likely that good and bad `shocks' that are

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

- Original Message - From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 7:34 AM Subject: Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq > At 10:59 PM 2/5/2003 -0600 Dan Minette wrote: >

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

--- Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe, but how? During 1999 and 2000 as the Fed > raised interest rates > (and after Greenspan's famous "irrational > exuberance" comment), the > market continued to increase at a dramatic rate. > What more could have > been done to combat the madness o

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

At 11:21 PM 2/5/2003 -0600 Dan Minette wrote: >I was able to obtain some government numbers at >http://www.nber.org/~confer/99/TAXATION/sinai.pdf > >and the average from '92 to '97 was 30 billion. I did not find these numbers.The numbers I did see on page 42 seemed to indicate that even in the

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

At 10:59 PM 2/5/2003 -0600 Dan Minette wrote: >> Indeed, from 1994 to 1999, capital gains reports under Adjusted Gross >> Income more than tripled in nominal terms. > >That's because there was a capital gains tax cut in '97. It give folks a >chance to cash in on their capital gains while paying mi

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:26:55PM -0600, Steve Sloan II wrote: > It wouldn't have to be random to be completely independent > of which politician was in power. Actually, I think that (independent of President) is exactly what was meant by "random" in this context. > Clinton's administration saw

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:59:41PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote: > If you want, John, I can do a Monte Carlo analysis on the probability > that random variations could have caused the difference between the > stock market performance under Republicans and Democrats. I'm not John, but I would like to

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

Dan Minette wrote: If you want, John, I can do a Monte Carlo analysis on the probability that random variations could have caused the difference between the stock market performance under Republicans and Democrats. It wouldn't have to be random to be completely independent of which politician w

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

- Original Message - From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:59 PM Subject: Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq > > - Original Message - > From: "John

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

Kevin Tarr wrote: > > At 09:00 PM 2/5/2003 -0600, you wrote: > >Kevin Tarr wrote: > > > > > Kevin T. > > > Time to enjoy a nice venison dinner, totally produced by me from hoof > > to table. > > > >WOW! You gave birth to Bambi? > > > >Now I'm *really* impressed! > > > > Julia > > No but

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

- Original Message - From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:51 PM Subject: Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq > In 1999, 6% of federal receipts were from capitol gain

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

- Original Message - From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:31 PM Subject: Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq > > I'm willing to bet that if Bush had that s

RE: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Reuter Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:31:54PM -0500, John D. Gio

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

In 1999, 6% of federal receipts were from capitol gains. i.e. $110bil out of $1.828 tril. Indeed, from 1994 to 1999, capital gains reports under Adjusted Gross Income more than tripled in nominal terms. JDG At 10:31 PM 2/5/2003 -0500 John D. Giorgis wrote: >At 07:56 PM 2/5/2003 -0600 Dan Min

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:31:54PM -0500, John D. Giorgis wrote: > The 1990's represented an unprecedented economic phenomenon, and > there appears to have been a 50-50 chance of it occuring underneath a > Republican or Democratic President, Over a longer period, from 1948 to 2001, the average an

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

At 07:56 PM 2/5/2003 -0600 Dan Minette wrote: >> Eh, he got a mighty fine assist from capital gains revenues from a stock >> market bubble. > >OK, what fraction of US goverment income comes from capital gains revenues? I'm willing to bet that if Bush had that same fraction that Clinton did, we wou

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

At 09:00 PM 2/5/2003 -0600, you wrote: Kevin Tarr wrote: > Kevin T. > Time to enjoy a nice venison dinner, totally produced by me from hoof to table. WOW! You gave birth to Bambi? Now I'm *really* impressed! Julia No but I took her home and Thumper. Kevin T. BWBT

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

Kevin Tarr wrote: > Kevin T. > Time to enjoy a nice venison dinner, totally produced by me from hoof to table. WOW! You gave birth to Bambi? Now I'm *really* impressed! Julia ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

It should be funded, in part at least, by > >a repeal of the tax cuts. > > > >Dan M. > > You must have missed-typed. You meant spending cuts in other takerment > programs. > > Kevin T. > Tax the poor. No. One of the problem with a market economy is that it tends to focus wealth in the hands of

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

- Original Message - From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:34 PM Subject: Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq > At 07:24 PM 2/5/2003 -0600 Dan Minette wrote:

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

At 07:24 PM 2/5/2003 -0600 Dan Minette wrote: >The Bush tax cut will accelerate that. Clinton showed he got the right >balance of taxes and spending, and managed to produce a surplus. Eh, he got a mighty fine assist from capital gains revenues from a stock market bubble. And his spending, while

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

- Original Message - From: "Kevin Tarr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:00 PM Subject: Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq > At 11:49 AM 2/5/2003 -0600, you wrote: > > >--

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

At 11:49 AM 2/5/2003 -0600, you wrote: - Original Message - From: "Marvin Long, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:29 AM Subject: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq > > I would

Re: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

- Original Message - From: "Marvin Long, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:29 AM Subject: Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq > > I would leaven it with the following from the N

Plus the NY Times Re: The Washington Post Editorial on Iraq

I would leaven it with the following from the NY Times (Friedman): http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/05/opinion/05FRIE.html On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Gautam Mukunda wrote: > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26873-2003Feb4.html > > For non-American readers, the Washington

Re: Access To On-line NY Times Articles

Julia Thompson wrote: > Alberto Monteiro wrote: >>I like to register with name "sunda" and password >>"aqcatb". This acronymous is obvious for any brazilian. And no, I >>can't explain it in this sensible and polite community > > Will you mail an explanation off-list to anyone admitting to be >

Re: Access To On-line NY Times Articles

At 22:44 27-09-2002 +, Alberto Monteiro wrote: > >I know some people object to having to register in order to read on-line NY > >Times articles, so I took the liberty of getting a registration for all > of us. > > > >Member ID = brinlist > >Password = br

Re: Access To On-line NY Times Articles

At 06:02 PM 9/27/02, Julia Thompson wrote: >Alberto Monteiro wrote: > > > > Jeroen wrote: > > > > > > > >I know some people object to having to register in order to read > on-line NY > > >Times articles, so I took the liberty of getting a

Re: Access To On-line NY Times Articles

Alberto Monteiro wrote: > > Jeroen wrote: > > > > >I know some people object to having to register in order to read on-line NY > >Times articles, so I took the liberty of getting a registration for all of us. > > > >Member ID = brinlist > >Password

Re: Access To On-line NY Times Articles

Jeroen wrote: > >I know some people object to having to register in order to read on-line NY >Times articles, so I took the liberty of getting a registration for all of us. > >Member ID = brinlist >Password = brinlist > :-)) I like to register with name

Re: Access To On-line NY Times Articles

--- "J. van Baardwijk" wrote: > I know some people object to having to register in > order to read on-line NY > Times articles, so I took the liberty of getting a > registration for all of us. > > Member ID = brinlist > Password = brinlist > > > Jer

Access To On-line NY Times Articles

I know some people object to having to register in order to read on-line NY Times articles, so I took the liberty of getting a registration for all of us. Member ID = brinlist Password = brinlist Jeroen "Service with a smile" van