>From: Ray Ludenia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion
>To: Killer Bs Discussion
>Subject: Re: Turkey, Genocide & Congress.
>Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:43:33 +1000
>
>
>On 16/10/2007, at 5:01 AM, Gary Nunn wrote:
>
> > Even if it WAS
On 16/10/2007, at 5:01 AM, Gary Nunn wrote:
> Even if it WAS genocide, the question still remains: what good comes
> from
> making that declaration 90 years after the fact? How does that
> improve the
> world today?
Facile answer: "Those Who Forget History Are Doomed to Repeat It".
Regards,
On 10/15/07, Gary Nunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >So I take it you don't think this was genocide?
>
> I didn't say that it wasn't genocide, I was questioning what good could
> possibly come from making this declaration 90 years after the fact -
It's true, you were doing this. However your lan
>So I take it you don't think this was genocide?
>Martin
I didn't say that it wasn't genocide, I was questioning what good could
possibly come from making this declaration 90 years after the fact -
especially if it's going to piss off an allied nation that is clearly a
different regime.
As som
> Gary Nunn wrote:
>
> It seems to me that Congress should have more important
> issues to deal with than trying to appease lobbyist with a
> hidden agenda over something that happened 90 years ago.
I have the sinking feeling that the Democrats in control of Congress
WANT to anger Turkey. If t
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007, Robert Seeberger wrote:
> We usually celebrate our turkey genocide in late November.
> But we don't invite Congress.
Was it the President or Congress who set the date for that turkey
genocide?
Julia
too lazy to go to Wikipedia this morning
___
Ray Ludenia wrote:
>
> > Of course, to be fair, there should be matching resolutions
> > for EVERY country. They could go through the alphabet, and
> > do one a week..
>
> Quite right as I started saying above. Where does one draw the line?
>
I was reading one Wikipedia article about Genocides,
On 15/10/2007, at 9:28 AM, David Hobby wrote:
> Gary Nunn wrote:
>>
>> I'm REALLY struggling with this one. I don't understand what good
>> could
>> possibly come from passing a resolution labeling this WW1 issue as
>> "genocide".
I tend to agree with you on a practical basis, and I have actual
David Hobby wrote:
>
>> ISTANBUL, Turkey - Turkey's top general warned that ties with
>> the U.S., already strained by attacks from rebels hiding in
>> Iraq, will be irreversibly damaged if Congress passes a
>> resolution that labels the World War I-era killings of
>> Armenians a genocide.
>
> Ye
On 10/14/07, Gary Nunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm REALLY struggling with this one. I don't understand what good could
> possibly come from passing a resolution labeling this WW1 issue as
> "genocide".
So I take it you don't think this was genocide?
Martin
Gary Nunn wrote:
>
> I'm REALLY struggling with this one. I don't understand what good could
> possibly come from passing a resolution labeling this WW1 issue as
> "genocide".
>
...
> ISTANBUL, Turkey - Turkey's top general warned that ties with the U.S.,
> already strained by attacks from rebels
We usually celebrate our turkey genocide in late November.
But we don't invite Congress.
xponent
We Don't Invite The President Either Maru
rob
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
12 matches
Mail list logo
