[PATCH] Implement join --check-order and --nocheck-order.

2008-02-19 Thread James Youngman
This is a consolidated patch including all the previous changes, implementing order checking in join by default. make distcheck works (if I move distcheck-hook from Makefile.am to GNUmakefile). 2008-02-16 James Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] * src/join.c: Support --check-order and

Re: Problems building coreutils HEAD against gnulib HEAD

2008-02-19 Thread James Youngman
On Feb 19, 2008 3:40 AM, Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I am, having seen it myself. It happens when you have a stale symlink from an older copy of gnulib, but which now points nowhere because the file was renamed in gnulib. gnulib-tool --import automatically deletes such symlinks,

[PATCH] Fix check-ls-dircolors for VPATH build.

2008-02-19 Thread James Youngman
2008-02-19 James Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Makefile.am (check-ls-dircolors): Look for sources under $(top_srcdir), not under .. Signed-off-by: James Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Makefile.am |6 -- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

GNUmakefile missing from build dir in VPATH build

2008-02-19 Thread James Youngman
VPATH builds work for me in current coreutils head. However, distcheck gails. GNUmakefile exists in $(top_srcdir) but not the build directory. Distcheck does make distcheck-hook. That's defined in the Makefile (from $(top_srcdir)/Makefile.am):- distcheck-hook: check-ls-dircolors

Re: Problems building coreutils HEAD against gnulib HEAD

2008-02-19 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: According to Bob Proulx on 2/18/2008 6:56 PM: | ./bootstrap: aclocal --force -I m4 ... | aclocal: aclocal: file `m4/isnan.m4' does not exist | 1 | | Not sure about that. But I am, having seen it myself. It happens when you have a stale symlink from an

Re: [PATCH] Fix check-ls-dircolors for VPATH build.

2008-02-19 Thread Jim Meyering
James Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008-02-19 James Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Makefile.am (check-ls-dircolors): Look for sources under $(top_srcdir), not under .. Thanks. I've pushed this, retaining backslash alignment and using $(srcdir) rather than $(top_srcdir).

Re: Problems building coreutils HEAD against gnulib HEAD

2008-02-19 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [adding bug-automake] According to Jim Meyering on 2/19/2008 4:33 AM: | But I am, having seen it myself. It happens when you have a stale symlink | from an older copy of gnulib, but which now points nowhere because the | file was renamed in gnulib.

Re: bug in the command du

2008-02-19 Thread Philip Rowlands
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Jochen Röder wrote: i've found a bug in the command du When i list recursivly directories and i only want to see the binary count of all files. I become a wrong result. The command e.g. du -ab add the bytes from . in every directory to the result. This is not a bug. -a

Re: GNUmakefile missing from build dir in VPATH build

2008-02-19 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to James Youngman on 2/19/2008 4:53 AM: | GNUmakefile exists in $(top_srcdir) but not the build directory. | Distcheck does make distcheck-hook. That's defined in the Makefile | (from $(top_srcdir)/Makefile.am):- Shouldn't it be possible

Re: [PATCH] Implement join --check-order and --nocheck-order.

2008-02-19 Thread Jim Meyering
James Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a consolidated patch including all the previous changes, implementing order checking in join by default. make distcheck works (if I move distcheck-hook from Makefile.am to GNUmakefile). 2008-02-16 James Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] *

Re: [PATCH] Implement join --check-order and --nocheck-order.

2008-02-19 Thread Jim Meyering
James Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a consolidated patch including all the previous changes, implementing order checking in join by default. make distcheck works (if I move distcheck-hook from Makefile.am to GNUmakefile). 2008-02-16 James Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] *

Re: [PATCH] better diagnostics for seq

2008-02-19 Thread Jim Meyering
Steven Schubiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for working on that. Attached is a revised patch that should take appropriately care of your suggestions. I ran make check and all tests passed. Furthermore, I checked coreutils.texi, but there seems to be

Re: [PATCH] Implement join --check-order and --nocheck-order.

2008-02-19 Thread Pádraig Brady
James Youngman wrote: This is a consolidated patch including all the previous changes, implementing order checking in join by default. make distcheck works (if I move distcheck-hook from Makefile.am to GNUmakefile). While I like the idea, I'm a little worried about the implementation. You

Re: Problems building coreutils HEAD against gnulib HEAD

2008-02-19 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [adding bug-automake] According to Jim Meyering on 2/19/2008 4:33 AM: | But I am, having seen it myself. It happens when you have a stale symlink | from an older copy of gnulib, but which now points nowhere because the | file was renamed in gnulib. | |

[RFC] seq: allow format string to contain no %-directives

2008-02-19 Thread Steven Schubiger
I was wondering how such an implementation would possibly look like. But before I dig into the code again, some clarification on the specifics of expected behavior would be regarded helpful. Would such a change allow for repeated items such as $ seq -f a 5 a a a a a for example? With following

Re: Problems building coreutils HEAD against gnulib HEAD

2008-02-19 Thread Andreas Schwab
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: +# Remove dangling symlinks in gnulib-populated directories. +# This depends on GNU find, and a relatively recent version at that. +# Ignore any failure for now, since it's only to avoid the relatively +# unusual case in which a symlinked-to file in

Re: [RFC] seq: allow format string to contain no %-directives

2008-02-19 Thread Jim Meyering
Steven Schubiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was wondering how such an implementation would possibly look like. But before I dig into the code again, some clarification on the specifics of expected behavior would be regarded helpful. Would such a change allow for repeated items such as $ seq

Re: Problems building coreutils HEAD against gnulib HEAD

2008-02-19 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello, * Eric Blake wrote on Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 02:28:35PM CET: [adding bug-automake] According to Jim Meyering on 2/19/2008 4:33 AM: | But I am, having seen it myself. It happens when you have a stale symlink | from an older copy of gnulib, but which now points nowhere because the |

Re: Problems building coreutils HEAD against gnulib HEAD

2008-02-19 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Andreas Schwab on 2/19/2008 8:37 AM: | Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | +# Remove dangling symlinks in gnulib-populated directories. | +# This depends on GNU find, and a relatively recent version at that. | +# Ignore any

Re: Problems building coreutils HEAD against gnulib HEAD

2008-02-19 Thread James Youngman
On Feb 19, 2008 8:12 PM, Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The goal here is not to delete all symlinks, just symlinks that are broken. Under the influence of -L, does -xtype l work like -lname '*' in detecting just the broken symlinks? For that you want find . -depth -type l -xtype l

Re: Problems building coreutils HEAD against gnulib HEAD

2008-02-19 Thread Andreas Schwab
Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: According to Andreas Schwab on 2/19/2008 8:37 AM: | Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | +# Remove dangling symlinks in gnulib-populated directories. | +# This depends on GNU find, and a relatively recent version at that. | +# Ignore any failure