maxim wexler wrote:
Please go to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list and look
for the recent thread 'grub hell'.
No one seems to know what the problem is.
I can't seem to post there.
Though I have no solution as of yet, a few things are clear:
1. Further up he writes, he can't install grub on hd0.
maxim wexler escribió:
Hi,
Please go to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list and look
for the recent thread 'grub hell'.
No one seems to know what the problem is.
Best regards,
Maxim Wexler
I've seen that you do want the detected (hd0), which it is your second
hard disk to be (hd1).
The most rat
maxim wexler escribió:
Hi,
Please go to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list and look
for the recent thread 'grub hell'.
No one seems to know what the problem is.
Best regards,
Maxim Wexler
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-user/msg_118108.xml
Tab completion at the grub prompt only finds the
secon
Hi,
Please go to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list and look
for the recent thread 'grub hell'.
No one seems to know what the problem is.
Best regards,
Maxim Wexler
Be a better sports nut! Let your teams fo
4-Jun-00 13:18 you wrote:
> Hello from Gregg C Levine
> The problem obviously sat with my interpetations of the installation rules,
> described in the info files. Since I only glanced at them to make sure they
> were installed correctly, this will require a closer look, and that I will
> do. Given
PROTECTED]
"Use the Force, Luke." Obi-Wan Kenobi
"Trust in the Force, Luke, and wait." Obi-Wan Kenobi
> -Original Message-
> From: OKUJI Yoshinori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2000 1:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROT
From: "Gregg C Levine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Is this a bug, continued
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 10:41:20 -0400
> At the request of a member of this list, I am inserting in full the log of
> the make install command sequence.
Ok, now we can talk about your real prob
Hello from Gregg C Levine usually with Jedi Knight Computers now at home
At the request of a member of this list, I am inserting in full the log of
the make install command sequence. My version of make, on the Red Hat Linux
v.5.1 system is version 3.76.1 The system contains the full GNU developmen
wait." Obi-Wan Kenobi
> -Original Message-
> From: OKUJI Yoshinori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2000 3:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Is this a bug?
>
>
> From: "Gregg C Levine" <[EMAIL
From: "Gregg C Levine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Is this a bug?
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 09:55:50 -0400
> I thought I made it perfectly clear... Well here goes, what was unexpected,
> is that the issuance of "make install" did not execute properly.
The wo
From: "Gregg C Levine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Is this a bug?
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 23:18:09 -0400
> The unexpected behavior was that the installation functions needed to be
> done individually.
I can't understand what you think "it was unexpected&qu
03, 2000 10:37 PM
> To: Gregg C Levine
> Cc: Bug-Grub
> Subject: Re: Is this a bug?
>
>
> >>>>> Gregg C Levine writes:
>
> GCL> With the current version of Grub, installed on a Red
> GCL> Hat Linux system, normally all I'd do is type ./configure, and
> Gregg C Levine writes:
GCL> With the current version of Grub, installed on a Red
GCL> Hat Linux system, normally all I'd do is type ./configure, and
GCL> tap return, and then type make, and then hit return again. At
GCL> least that was what happened with the earlier ones.
GCL> With th
Hello from Gregg C Levine usually with Jedi Knight Computers now at home:
With the current version of Grub, installed on a Red Hat Linux system,
normally all I'd do is type ./configure, and tap return, and then type make,
and then hit return again. At least that was what happened with the earlier
14 matches
Mail list logo
