DOC: Essay, 1.4 Building software

2016-07-22 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
> I'm not top posting. Hi Bug Squad, See: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/essay/building-software.html#music-representation I think that this part, especially the chords ('Simultaneous notes'), should be re-written, e.g.: \version "2.19" <> Cheers, Pierre ___

Re: DOC: Essay, 1.4 Building software

2016-07-22 Thread James
Pierre, On 22/07/16 12:46, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: I'm not top posting. Hi Bug Squad, See: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/essay/building-software.html#music-representation I think that this part, especially the chords ('Simultaneous notes'), should be re-written, e.g.: \

Re: DOC: Essay, 1.4 Building software

2016-07-22 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Hi James, Sorry for the misunderstanding. Have you tried the snippet ? Have you seen the result ? It should be written : { 4 } and not: <> Examples that follow should also be corrected. Cheers, Pierre 2016-07-22 14:00 GMT+02:00 James : > Pierre, > > > > On 22/07/16 12:46, Pierre Perol-Schn

Re: DOC: Essay, 1.4 Building software

2016-07-22 Thread James
Pierre, On 22/07/16 14:18, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: Hi James, Sorry for the misunderstanding. Have you tried the snippet ? Have you seen the result ? No but the online help is built using LilyPond (these are not static images). So the result should be the same as what is shown in that

Re: DOC: Essay, 1.4 Building software

2016-07-22 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
I clearly understand what you mean. Thing is that <> does not show what's on the picture (actually the link says: \relative c' { \new Voice { <> } } ) So I think it is not clear. Maybe this line should simply be deleted and the next example should be: \relative { f' <> } (or simply { << g'2 \\ { f'

Re: DOC: Essay, 1.4 Building software

2016-07-22 Thread Phil Holmes
"Pierre Perol-Schneider" wrote in message news:caphotuwtxrmr97w5m2ajkt4sudvqdbd93tqudk0vfuogxh0...@mail.gmail.com... I clearly understand what you mean. Thing is that <> does not show what's on the picture (actually the link says: \relative c' { \new Voice { <> } } ) So I think it is not clear.

Re: DOC: Essay, 1.4 Building software

2016-07-22 Thread David Kastrup
Pierre Perol-Schneider writes: > Hi James, > > Sorry for the misunderstanding. > Have you tried the snippet ? Have you seen the result ? > > It should be written : > > { 4 } > > and not: > > <> > > Examples that follow should also be corrected. Well, "corrected" is a hard word: they work as writ

Re: DOC: Essay, 1.4 Building software

2016-07-22 Thread David Kastrup
"Phil Holmes" writes: > "Pierre Perol-Schneider" wrote in > message > news:caphotuwtxrmr97w5m2ajkt4sudvqdbd93tqudk0vfuogxh0...@mail.gmail.com... >>I clearly understand what you mean. >> Thing is that <> does not show what's on the picture (actually >> the link says: \relative c' { \new Voice { <

Re: DOC: Essay, 1.4 Building software

2016-07-22 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
But of course. Sorry for my poor english : \relative c' { \new Voice { <> } } shows ok (of course) but <> does not. This essay is really nice, and I want to use it for a presentation. But I found this particular part unclear. Cheers, Pierre 2016-07-22 17:56 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > "Phil Hol

Re: DOC: Essay, 1.4 Building software

2016-07-22 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
My Dear David, At the time I started this thread I was 100% sure that you would answer something like this. ;) Well, let's try to see former version : http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/essay/building-software, v2.14 says: "f4" compare to http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/essay/

Re: DOC: Essay, 1.4 Building software

2016-07-22 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 22.07.2016 15:18, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote: It should be written : { 4 } Without the {}, actually. They form a sequential music expression, and that step comes only later. and not: <> I agree that it should be corrected. While it works (in an explicitly instantiated voice), I do

Re: DOC: Essay, 1.4 Building software

2016-07-22 Thread David Kastrup
Pierre Perol-Schneider writes: > My Dear David, > > At the time I started this thread I was 100% sure that you would answer > something like this. ;) > Well, let's try to see former version : > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/essay/building-software, v2.14 > says: "f4" > compare to >