On 19:45 Tue 08 Feb , Rinaldo DiGiorgio wrote:
On Feb 8, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I take that back. Welcome rinaldo to the OpenJDK commit list!
I will put you down as a reviewer. I didn't think you had the OpenJDK ID
yet.
Thanks -- never expected to be here from
On 12:34 Wed 09 Feb , Rinaldo DiGiorgio wrote:
has a new process
and alias for getting access, once you send to it you get an invitation to
join.
Response was very fast and you get a nice form to fill out.
Is this new process documented somewhere?
I may have
On 16:43 Wed 02 Feb , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
On Feb 2, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Some messages in the build logs are getting corrupted, perhaps
because of parallism. For example,
../../../src/plugin/solaris/jvm_natives/server.c:2031: warning: cast
to pointer
On 19:33 Mon 24 Jan , Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, January 24, 2011 18:00, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 01/24/2011 04:54 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
http://download.java.net/jaxp/1.4.5/dev/jaxp-1_4_5-dev.zip
TVM,
I made sure to place a copy in the icedtea drops backup dir just
in
On 16:46 Wed 05 Jan , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Need reviewer: Remove SKIP_OPENJDK_BUILD
Now that the binary plugs are gone, this logic doesn't make much sense.
7009969: Remove SKIP_OPENJDK_BUILD from top Makefile
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/jdk7-build-skip-openjdk/webrev/
On 11:48 Tue 04 Jan , Andrew Haley wrote:
On 01/03/2011 03:09 AM, Lussier, Denis wrote:
I too like the idea that the version of OpenJDK that comes pre-built with
your Linux distro is pre-installed and just works. But... I wonder how/if
the Linux Distro's will configure simultaneously
On 15:50 Tue 28 Dec , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
These changes are only adding the year 2010, to the copyright for
files modified in 2010.
The first year should be preserved.
The pattern YEAR1, YEAR2, in the Oracle copyright line is the
equivalent of the old Sun
copyright year range
On 09:56 Thu 23 Dec , Andrew Haley wrote:
On 12/23/2010 05:32 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Kelly O'Hair said the following on 12/23/10 11:51:
Need reviewer: OpenJDK7 binary plug logic removal
7008723: Remove binary plugs creation and use from openjdk
On 14:19 Wed 22 Dec , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
On Dec 22, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 16:29 Tue 21 Dec , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I'm back with another stab at a webrev and modified proposal.
6989472: Provide simple jdk identification information in the install
not it. I have never installed or setup NFS
on this laptop - and I installed Fedora 14 from scratch on it recently.
On 12/10/2010 07:10 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Easiest thing to try is to set ALT_OUTPUTDIR to a directory on a local
disk. I've not had problems with having the source on NFS
On 14:44 Mon 29 Nov , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Need reviewers and comments:
6989472: Provide simple jdk identification information in the
install image
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/jdk_release/webrev/
With JDK6 Updates we purposely resisted many rebranding changes
On 15:08 Mon 29 Nov , Dalibor Topic wrote:
On 11/26/10 3:54 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 11/26/2010 02:48 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Hm. It's been a long time since I heard of anyone use the binary plugs for
anything.
Certainly neither regular OpenJDK builds nor IcedTea builds do. So
On 09:38 Thu 25 Nov , Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 20:39 -0600, kevin diggs wrote:
This question is a little ... weird ... but ...
Is the thought of trying to build your sdk with gcj ... heresy (sp?).
If not please give me ... your thought as to whether it has any
On 11:36 Wed 24 Nov , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Dang... just shoot me now. :^(
Try this:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/
Sorry about that.
Looks ok to me.
I assume the motivation is so that MILESTONE doesn't have to be duplicated
in setting
On 22:15 Mon 22 Nov , Patrick Reinhart wrote:
Am 22.11.10 22:09, schrieb Dr Andrew John Hughes:
I'm quite puzzled as to how this hasn't been spotted before now, but I
tried to build jdk7/jdk7 today (b118 from hg), using exactly the same
script as I usually do, and immediately failed due
On 14:06 Mon 22 Nov , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
On Nov 22, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 22:15 Mon 22 Nov , Patrick Reinhart wrote:
Am 22.11.10 22:09, schrieb Dr Andrew John Hughes:
I'm quite puzzled as to how this hasn't been spotted before now,
but I
tried
, David Holmes wrote:
Any enlightenment on how this only just started happening? Has the
alsa check been disabled previously?
David
Kelly O'Hair said the following on 11/23/10 08:06:
On Nov 22, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 22:15 Mon 22 Nov , Patrick Reinhart
On 18 November 2010 12:44, Jonathan Tripathy jon...@abpni.co.uk wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Does the OpenJDK project have any Field of Use restrictions? Are
kiosk/set top box style installation allowed?
Thanks
http://openjdk.java.net/legal/
--
Andrew :-)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
On 09:27 Thu 18 Nov , Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 11:31 +0530, ramakanth varala wrote:
My target is to get openjdk build for target board (ARM) .
In the process i thought i would build openjdk first to my host
machine i.e of fedora 8.
Fedora 8 is very outdated (3
On 09:30 Wed 17 Nov , Gary Benson wrote:
Hi Ramakanth,
It looks like you're using IcedTea, so I'm copying in distro-pkg-dev
which is the mailing list most IcedTea stuff is discussed on.
It also looks like you're using Fedora 8, which is very old. I'm not
saying you won't be able to
On 9 November 2010 17:41, Pete Brunet peter.bru...@oracle.com wrote:
I notice that com/sun/image is missing from my OpenJDK7 clone, i.e. it's
not in the classes directory or the rt.jar files in the two image
directores (jre and jdk). Also the demo itself isn't in the OpenJDK7
tree. Both the
On 20 October 2010 13:07, Andreas Kohn andreas.k...@fredhopper.com wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to update my local JDK7 build, and stumbled across a problem
when building with a JDK7 from ~2010-09-10:
build-bootstrap-javac:
[javac] Compiling 78 source files to
On 21 September 2010 07:33, Martin Buchholz marti...@google.com wrote:
This appears to be another case where the hotspot and jdk repo makefiles
differ.
hotspot does:
# statically link libgcc and/or libgcc_s, libgcc does not exist before
gcc-3.x.
ifneq (${CC_VER_MAJOR}, 2)
STATIC_LIBGCC
On 18 August 2010 09:53, Gary Benson gben...@redhat.com wrote:
Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 13:51 -0700, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I had assumed this was a file in the hotspot repo, but it's
actually in the top repo. Feel free to push this change into
the tl forest, or
On 24 August 2010 13:18, Dr Andrew John Hughes ahug...@redhat.com wrote:
On 18 August 2010 09:53, Gary Benson gben...@redhat.com wrote:
Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 13:51 -0700, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I had assumed this was a file in the hotspot repo, but it's
actually
On 13 August 2010 16:58, Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@oracle.com wrote:
On Aug 13, 2010, at 1:49 AM, Gary Benson wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
On 8/12/10 10:58 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
There isn't a document but I'm happy to write one if you'd like,
either as a section of README-builds.html or a
On 24 June 2010 20:43, Omair Majid oma...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I discovered a bug in the build process: html entities are not built from
scratch. I have filed the bug at [1] and posted a more detailed explanation.
I would appreciate it if someone could review it.
Thanks,
Omair
[1]
On 16 June 2010 00:41, Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@oracle.com wrote:
On Jun 15, 2010, at 4:36 AM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 15 June 2010 01:47, Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@oracle.com wrote:
Need reviewer, had this change sitting around and forgot about it.
6535379: Restructure echo messages
On 15 June 2010 19:14, qi@sun.com wrote
Changeset: cfeea66a3fa8
Author: duke
Date: 2007-12-01 00:00 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/deploy/rev/cfeea66a3fa8
Initial load
+ .hgignore
+ ASSEMBLY_EXCEPTION
+ LICENSE
+ Makefile
+ README
+ README-builds.html
+
On 16 June 2010 16:43, Jennifer Zuo jennifer@oracle.com wrote:
This is the repo for deployment group. The directory was there and just got
populated.
Ok. But what we will see going into it?
Regards,
Jennifer
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 15 June 2010 19:14, qi@sun.com wrote
On 16 June 2010 16:49, Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@oracle.com wrote:
A new tree? What's this for?
-- Andrew :-)
Old team forest, just never used until now.
The deployment team deals with the various java deployment mechanisms, java
webstart,
windows installers, etc.
They mostly work in the
On 15 June 2010 01:47, Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@oracle.com wrote:
Need reviewer, had this change sitting around and forgot about it.
6535379: Restructure echo messages in makefiles, avoid echo -e
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/sanitycleanup/webrev/
Creates some common patterns
On 7 June 2010 20:21, Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@oracle.com wrote:
Note that Windows7 is a bit of an unknown to use as far as being a build
machine, it should work, but in
general, the formal 32bit builds of jdk7 use older Windows releases, e.g.
2000 and soon that newer one XP ;^)
You are
On 8 June 2010 09:26, Dalibor Topic dalibor.to...@sun.com wrote:
cowwoc wrote:
There's no good reason for Windows builds to be this difficult...
One of the major good reasons, in my personal, biased opinion,
is that Windows, contrary to Linux or OpenSolaris, lacks a central
software
On 8 June 2010 15:20, Dalibor Topic dalibor.to...@sun.com wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
This seems to be common with ex-proprietary codebases; I remember
having major issues building Firefox back in the day, and some of the
worst build systems I can think of other than OpenJDK
Is it really necessary for the sanity script to be flushing all
buffers to disc on GNU/Linux boxes?
ifeq ($(PLATFORM), linux)
FREE_SPACE := $(shell $(DF) --sync -kP $(OUTPUTDIR) | $(TAIL) -1 |
$(NAWK) '{print $$4;}')
TEMP_FREE_SPACE := $(shell $(DF) --sync -kP $(TEMP_DISK) | $(TAIL)
-1 |
Hi,
The webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/zero/webrev.04/
extends the build changes added as part of the Zero assembler port to
also support the alpha architecture. This has been used in IcedTea6
since July 2008.
The change to ARCH is necessary so we don't get -Dalpha which
conflicts
) \
-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT
Just a suggestion. One of these days, the whole ARCH issue needs to be
cleaned up, just not sure that will ever happen. :^(
Filed this bug for you.
6958257: Add support for alpha
-kto
On Jun 3, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Andrew John Hughes wrote
On 3 June 2010 21:12, Alan Bateman alan.bate...@oracle.com wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
:
Thanks Kelly. Your change does make more sense, especially given we
don't yet use the _alpha_ define anyway. I've pushed the revised
version:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/corba/rev
In the langtools build, the genstubs tool is passed a classpath:
genstubs
srcdir=${import.jdk.src.dir} destdir=${build.genstubs.dir}
includes=${import.jdk.stub.files}
fork=true
On 26 March 2010 16:06, Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@oracle.com wrote:
It appears that a problem with ant 1.7.1 can potentially impact the open jdk
builds, see
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43114 for more
information.
The potential for missing package-info.class files seems
On 28 March 2010 16:34, Dalibor Topic dalibor.to...@sun.com wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 26 March 2010 16:06, Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@oracle.com wrote:
It appears that a problem with ant 1.7.1 can potentially impact the open jdk
builds, see
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla
On 22 February 2010 20:39, Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Enabling VERBOSE=true (presumably) should cause the build to produce
more verbose build output.
However, on langtools it just causes Ant to print the diagnostics
(which have already been
Enabling VERBOSE=true (presumably) should cause the build to produce
more verbose build output.
However, on langtools it just causes Ant to print the diagnostics
(which have already been logged beforehand anyway) and not build
langtools at all.
I'd suggest the following change:
diff -r
On 28 January 2010 20:07, Joseph D. Darcy joe.da...@sun.com wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/16 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2010/1/16 Joseph D. Darcy joe.da...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/15 Ken Cavanaugh ken.cavana...@sun.com:
The fixes look
2010/1/15 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2010/1/15 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/15 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/15 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes
2010/1/8 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2010/1/8 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/8 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Joe Darcy wrote:
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Not many jdk developers build the docs on a regular basis
2010/1/15 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/8 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2010/1/8 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/8 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Joe Darcy wrote
2010/1/15 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2010/1/15 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/8 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2010/1/8 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/8 Jonathan
When building documentation, both OpenJDK6 and OpenJDK7 spit out a
number of warnings when building documentation:
/mnt/builder/jdk6/impsrc/javax/rmi/PortableRemoteObject.java:171:
warning - Tag @link: reference not found: Stub#connect
2010/1/15 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/15 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/15 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2010/1/15 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John
2010/1/15 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/15 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/15 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/15 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and
2010/1/15 Ken Cavanaugh ken.cavana...@sun.com:
The fixes look good to me.
Thanks,
Ken.
On Jan 15, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
When building documentation, both OpenJDK6 and OpenJDK7 spit out a
number of warnings when building documentation:
/mnt
2010/1/16 Joseph D. Darcy joe.da...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/15 Ken Cavanaugh ken.cavana...@sun.com:
The fixes look good to me.
Thanks,
Ken.
On Jan 15, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
When building documentation, both OpenJDK6
2010/1/8 Joe Darcy joe.da...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/7 Tim Bell tim.b...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Is it tl or build for this one?
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Either one should be fine. Whatever is easier for you.
Not sure what the tl schedule is right now.
I
In testing OpenJDK6 prior to the release of b18, one issue that has
arisen is that the version output:
openjdk version 1.6.0-internal
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0-internal-andrew_21_dec_2009_18_36-b00)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode)
gives no indication as to
2009/12/23 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/12/23 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/11/19 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Need reviewer. Some very minor top level make file changes.
6727046: Add message when docs are skipped in control
2010/1/7 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/12/23 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/12/23 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/11/19 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Need reviewer. Some very minor top level
With OpenJDK7 b78:
Recursively making docs docs @ Thu Jan 7 21:01:48 GMT 2010 ...
make[3]: Entering directory
`/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/icedtea/jdk/make/docs'
rm -f -r /mnt/builder/icedtea/docs/api
/bin/mkdir -p /mnt/builder/icedtea/docs/api
/usr/lib/jvm/icedtea6/bin/java
2010/1/8 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2010/1/8 Joe Darcy joe.da...@sun.com:
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Not many jdk developers build the docs on a regular basis that I know of.
The docs are certainly built nightly from the master area (jdk7/jdk7),
and should be built as part
2010/1/8 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/8 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Joe Darcy wrote:
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Not many jdk developers build the docs on a regular basis that I know of.
The docs are certainly built nightly from
2009/12/23 Alan Bateman alan.bate...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On building OpenJDK6 from the Mercurial forest with IcedTea, I found
that the class sun.nio.cs.Unicode is not built as it is not listed in
FILES_java.gmk. Presumably, it was being pulled in before by some
dependency
2009/12/23 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/11/19 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Need reviewer. Some very minor top level make file changes.
6727046: Add message when docs are skipped in control build
6864011: typo? in top level Makefile: DAYE_STAMP
On building OpenJDK6 from the Mercurial forest with IcedTea, I found
that the class sun.nio.cs.Unicode is not built as it is not listed in
FILES_java.gmk. Presumably, it was being pulled in before by some
dependency which has changed since b17. The failure only occurs when
bootstrapping with ecj
2009/12/10 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
I'm documenting my (unbelievably difficult but ultimately) successful
experience of building OpenJDK on Windows with Visual Studio express
edition.
Thanks for sending this out. You do deserve some kind of medal,
2009/12/10 Ray Kiddy r...@ganymede.org:
On Dec 10, 2009, at 9:05 AM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/12/10 Ray Kiddy r...@ganymede.org:
I just wanted to update build people on this issue. There are pages on the
wiki for building on Mac OS X 10.5.8 and on Snow Leopard. See the Building
2009/11/24 Martin Buchholz marti...@google.com:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 15:39, Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com wrote:
What version of ant are you using?
I think I'm using 1.7.0
$ ant -version
Apache Ant version 1.7.1 compiled on May 6 2009
Boot JDK is OpenJDK6 b17.
--
Andrew :-)
Free
2009/11/23 Michael Franz mvfr...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I did a new fclone of the bsd repo today. When running the build I get the
following error:
javax.net.ssl.SSLException: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unexpected error:
java.security.InvalidAlgorithmParameterException: the trustAnchors parameter
2009/11/6 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I like this idea, the time to run a jdk jtreg test has put me off in the
past.
BTW, jtreg is the one thing I wouldn't mind having in the tree as it's
not something people are likely to have installed. IcedTea has a cut
2009/11/4 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
I need some formal reviewers on these jdk/test/Makefile changes.
More polish and changes may need to be done later, but there
is value in what I have now, and I need lots of help to improve
things (and fix some of our testcases).
Here is the
an essential
thing to do, sigh, but is anything simple with ant scripts or
Makefiles... :^(
I know what you mean all too well... :(
At one point, I managed to have three different JDKs, all from
different vendors, involved in the building of langtools...
-kto
Andrew John Hughes wrote
2009/11/4 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/11/4 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
I'm basically ok with this, but have one concern.
There is no longer a default ant value for drops.dir, it is only
set via the Makefile. Maybe that's ok, just not sure.
I
2009/11/4 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/11/4 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/11/4 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
I'm basically ok with this, but have one concern.
There is no longer a default ant value
the FontManager issue with b75, so for now I'd recommend m5:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/m5
which is currently b75 + build forest promotion + jsr166y
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/11/3 Clemens Eisserer linuxhi...@gmail.com:
Hi Andrew,
Difficult to say from just that. Have you tried using
2009/11/3 Clemens Eisserer linuxhi...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I've just tried syncing with master, however my build doesn't seem to
be able to handle jar-files - even with a fresh clone of jdk7/jdk or
jdk//2d/jdk:
[...@localhost linux-i586]$ bin/java -Dsun.java2d.xrender=True -jar
/fc8/usr/j.jar
2009/10/28 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
snip..
Well spotted; revised version here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/drops/webrev.03/
Does this look ok to push?
--
Andrew :-)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
Support Free Java!
Contribute
2009/10/28 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/10/28 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/10/23 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Kelly O'Hair
2009/10/28 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/10/28 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/10/28 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/10/23 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Kelly
2009/10/28 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/10/28 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/10/28 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/10/23 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com
2009/10/28 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/10/28 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/10/28 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/10/28 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Joseph D. Darcy wrote
2009/10/28 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/10/28 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/10/28 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/10/28 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes
2009/10/26 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
FYI...
Original Message
Subject: Boot cycle builds
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:21:22 -0700
From: Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com
To: jdk7...@openjdk.java.net
Heads up...
As soon as we can do a jdk7 boot cycle build again, I
2009/10/16 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Tim Bell wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
(snip!)
I think there's still an issue here that makes this patch worth
pushing. The 688 fix didn't cause the bug, but merely made it
visible to a lot more people. So 6889255 will only hide
2009/10/26 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/10/16 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Tim Bell wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
(snip!)
I think there's still an issue here that makes this patch worth
pushing. The 688 fix didn't cause the bug, but merely made
2009/10/26 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/10/26 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
FYI...
Original Message
Subject: Boot cycle builds
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:21:22 -0700
From: Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com
To: jdk7...@openjdk.java.net
Heads up
2009/10/26 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/10/26 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/10/16 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Tim Bell wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
(snip!)
I think there's still an issue here that makes
2009/10/26 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/10/26 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/10/26 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
FYI...
Original Message
Subject: Boot cycle builds
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:21:22
2009/10/23 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Sigh... if I'm changing jaxp, might as well change jaxws too
keep them in sync.
I effectively included the drop.dir change you wanted with these
webrevs:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/jdk7-tl-jaxp/webrev/
The fix for bug 688:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jdk/rev/14bd992a
breaks the build as it tries to use javah from ALT_JDK_IMPORT_DIR (via
JAVA_TOOLS_DIR) which is not set on normal builds.
The README tells the user to set ALT_BOOTDIR and changing
JAVA_TOOLS_DIR to be set to
2009/10/15 Tim Bell tim.b...@sun.com:
Gary Benson wrote:
As an update to my previous message, the HotSpot part of this patch
was tested and pushed to hotspot-comp last night, so the remaining
code for review is this:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbenson/zero-11-build/
I'm going on
2009/10/12 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
I saw the webrev for a while, and now I can't :^(, but I saw enough...
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/10/7 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
...[snip]...
I found a number of issues with the current version:
* The drop zips
.
-kto
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/10/7 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/9/22 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
This 6856630 change has been integrated into the build
forest jaxp and jaxws repositories:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jaxws/rev/ae2bec597586
http
2009/9/23 Dalibor Topic dalibor.to...@sun.com:
Hi,
Bringing the docs from OpenJDK 6 and OpenJDK 7 a bit more in line,
I offer you the following webrev for review, fixing
6872735: Further update build readme for new platforms
6641691: Bring build readme's up-to-date
with one potential
2009/8/27 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/8/27 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
On Aug 27, 2009, at 3:53 AM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/8/20 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/8/20 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew John
2009/8/18 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/8/18 Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibb...@sun.com:
Andrew,
If this is a patch for jdk7, it does not appear to be a patch to a recent
copy
of 7.
It's against b69 which is the latest release (from Friday). The
patches are against
2009/8/14 Martin Buchholz marti...@google.com:
As an experiment, I tried the obvious
diff --git a/make/Defs-internal.gmk b/make/Defs-internal.gmk
--- a/make/Defs-internal.gmk
+++ b/make/Defs-internal.gmk
@@ -205,6 +205,7 @@
JDK_MAKE_SHARED_DIR=$(ABS_JDK_TOPDIR)/make/common/shared \
2009/8/10 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/8/10 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/8/10 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/8/8 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/8/8 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh
/jaxp/drop_bundles/drop-src.zip
[get] Error getting
https://jaxp.dev.java.net/files/documents/913/140275/jdk7-jaxp-m5.zip
to /mnt/builder/openjdk.icedtea/jaxp/drop_bundles/drop-src.zip
[SNIP!]
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Strangely, curl worked so if I hack the delete invocations out
2009/8/8 Andrew John Hughes gnu_and...@member.fsf.org:
2009/8/8 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/8/8 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Yeah. I tossed this around in my head, drop seemed short and cute. ;^)
Most if not all the import components are tools
2009/8/8 Kelly O'Hair kelly.oh...@sun.com:
Yeah. I tossed this around in my head, drop seemed short and cute. ;^)
Most if not all the import components are tools used to do the build
but not sources that became part of the product built bits.
Maybe the IcedTea guys can chime in on this.
I'm
101 - 200 of 264 matches
Mail list logo
