Hi Steven,
On 07/03/2013 03:19 PM, Steven R. Loomis wrote:
> Omair,
> I didn't hear back from you on this list, but I will reply here with
> more details.
Sorry about the delay, I got busy with unrelated work.
> See diffs below. I would be very suspicious of how this
> could run without cras
Omair,
I didn't hear back from you on this list, but I will reply here with
more details. See diffs below. I would be very suspicious of how this
could run without crashing, if the tests I mentioned were run (anything
with 'kerning' in its name, using a font that actually uses kerning pairs
Omair,
I'm sorry I did not see this before. I probably would not have noticed
it except I happened to notice this reply.
I'm responsible for maintaining the version of ICU in JDK, and also
(read: main day job) IBM's lead for ICU for C/C++. ( But I speak for
myself here, of course. )
I t
Hi Phil,
Updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/system-icu/01/
It's still against jdk8/build and missing support for the old build system.
On 06/05/2013 02:02 PM, Phil Race wrote:
> Since this entirely affects a 2D component, please include 2d-dev in
> this discussion.
> I wo
Hi Erik,
Thanks for your comments. Sorry I couldn't get back to you earlier, I
was busy with a conference.
Here's an updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/system-icu/01/
On 06/05/2013 05:21 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> Is it required to remove the font/layout dir to use the sy
On 06/05/2013 02:50 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
I don't think it is tenable to have long-term maintenance of two build
systems. Any remaining blockers in the new build should be addressed
so the old build can be put out to pasture.
-Joe
... implying that we should make sure that blockers are filed
I don't think it is tenable to have long-term maintenance of two build
systems. Any remaining blockers in the new build should be addressed so
the old build can be put out to pasture.
-Joe
On 6/5/2013 1:50 PM, Phil Race wrote:
Heavens no. Its a blessing. I sometimes do development work in 7 b
Heavens no. Its a blessing. I sometimes do development work in 7 because
I can't get the new build to work, or to work the way I want.
I don't think I've ever gotten it to build on Windows.
The old build saves me time, disk space and repo maintenance headaches.
-phil.
On 6/5/2013 1:40 PM, Alan B
On 05/06/2013 19:02, Phil Race wrote:
Yes, please support the old build system.
Is this really necessary? The old build is a tax and we really need it
to die. In this case, it's a new feature and I don't see any point in
anyone spending time adding this support to the old build.
-Alan
Omair,
Since this entirely affects a 2D component, please include 2d-dev in
this discussion.
I would have been 'surprised' to see this change if I hadn't just
spotted this thread.
And I believe this change should be integrated via the 2D forest.
Yes, please support the old build system.
I am no
Hello,
Is it required to remove the font/layout dir to use the system version?
I would expect USE_EXTERNAL_ICU_LE=true would add an exclude for that
directory to SetupNativeCompilation,BUILD_LIBFONTMANAGER.
If you expect to delete the source tree on your side, why not have
configure check fo
Hi,
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/system-icu/00/
This implements support for linking against the system-installed ICU
instead of building and linking against the bundled copy of ICU in
OpenJDK8. Now someone building OpenJDK can delete the .../font/layout
directory and use con
12 matches
Mail list logo
