On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 08:32 -0400, Keith McGuigan wrote:
> This appears to remove support for version 2.7. Is that intentional?
There has never been a 2.7 kernel.
2.6.39.3 is the last before the 3.0 series.
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Linux_kernel#Version_numbering
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 15:41 +0100, Mario Torre wrote:
> 2012/3/5 martin burtscher :
> > I try to port OpenJDK to the OS VxWorks. The Problem is, that i cant compile
> > it on a VxWorks-Machine, so i have to cross-compile it from a Linux machine.
> > What I've read so far is, that i have to use open
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 12:39:57PM +0100, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> Aha! :-). Any ideas on how far I need to downgrade the version of hg?
> (I'm 2.3 at the moment).
I am at 2.2.3. The hgforest extension as maintained at
http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/hgforest
(which is a merge of various hgforest
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 10:39 -0400, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> This is an issue that has been with us for a while. See:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100062
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7188845
>
> for some background.
> [...]
> It's not clear to me why thi
Hi Roman,
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 10:36 +0200, Roman Kennke wrote:
> while developing on my Innovators Challenge project, I came about the
> following build error:
>
> http://kennke.org/~roman/build-error.txt
It is easier if you at least include the error/warnings in the email:
error: bad
Hi Erik,
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 05:23 -0700, Erik Trimble wrote:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > 2008/6/4 Kelly O'Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> Not sure what you mean by the Sun Studio trap.
> >
> > I'm referring back to the Java trap - before Sun released their JDK
> > under the GPL,
> > i
Hi Ken,
On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 10:35 -0700, Ken Cavanaugh wrote:
> Mark Reinhold wrote:
> > Andrew: Thanks for the patch!
> >
> > The CORBA code isn't maintained directly in OpenJDK, but rather in a
> > sub-project of GlassFish (https://glassfish-corba.dev.java.net/).
> >
> > That's why there's no
ittle
cleaner: http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/PackagingExtensions
2008-06-22 Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* patches/icedtea-rhino.patch: New patch.
* Makefile.am: Add RHINO_JAR to environment variable lists.
(ICEDTEA_PATHCES): Add patches/icedtea-
Hi David,
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 11:43 -0700, David Herron wrote:
> Mark Wielaard wrote:
> In my JavaOne talk Sandeep and I had worked up a hack with the same
> purpose. He's been busy enough that he hadn't had a chance to turn the
> hack into an official proposal like th
Hi Dalibor,
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 00:09 +0200, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> > I would like to find a way to do this cleaner though. But the current
> > code relies on being on the bootclasspath which makes things a little
> > tricky.
> >
> Landon suggested a while ago exploring https://scripting.dev.
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 14:51 -0700, Dmitri Trembovetski wrote:
> Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
> > Martin Buchholz skrev den 24-06-2008 19:57:
> >> I am in favor of the fundamental change to a "configure + make" model,
> >> instead of configury stuff being done in the Makefiles as is the
> >>
Hi Dimitri,
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 08:45 -0700, Dmitri Trembovetski wrote:
> Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >>> I agree, but I have understood that this work has been done in IcedTea
> >>> already. Is there any estimate when these two codebases may converge?
> >>
Hi Thorbjørn,
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 23:53 +0200, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
> I gave it a try again, just to see what happens.
>
> The script first looks for an awk and finds /usr/bin/nawk, and then
> explicitly later looks for gawk. export GAWK=/usr/bin/nawk got me over
> that test.
It e
Hi Thorbjørn,
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 16:54 +0200, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
> Mark Wielaard skrev den 26-06-2008 08:31:
> >
> >> The script first looks for an awk and finds /usr/bin/nawk, and then
> >> explicitly later looks for gawk. export GAWK=/usr/bin/nawk
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 11:44 -0700, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> Best guess is that some kind of change to javac is triggering
> this failure, but I'm not convinced anything is 'wrong' with javac,
> just a change in the class files created implicitly. Stay tuned...
>
> In the corba repository I did f
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 00:46 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > I'm currently stuck on this strange issue whereby
> > sun_java2d_opengl_OGLContext_OGLContextCaps.h is not being generated.
> > Has anyone else seen this? To try for yourself, you can get a b33
> > IcedTea from http://
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 00:46 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> ../../../src/share/native/sun/java2d/opengl/OGLContext.c:855: error:
> 'sun_java2d_opengl_OGLContext_OGLContextCaps_CAPS_TEXNONSQUARE'
> undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> gjavah only generates a subset
This one i
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 14:49 -0700, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> If you're running on Ubuntu, the makefiles could check for the
> installed-ness of various build-time dependencies.
> The Ubuntu packagers (i.e. doko) must already have such a list.
IcedTea has a list and configure tries to find the appro
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 15:34 -0700, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> Adding options to use the system versions of these graphics libraries
> is integrated into IcedTea already. IcedTea and Sun AWT engineers
> should work together to put such changes into OpenJDK7.
Yes, this would be great so we don't
Hi Jonathan (and hi CC compiler-dev, which I hope is the right
mailinglist for these javah/jni questions),
Maybe you saw these questions/discussion already around the openjdk
javah JNI headers generated for static final constant fields. Which
fields are eligible and which encoding is used in the g
Hi Anthony,
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 14:23 +0400, Anthony Petrov wrote:
> 1. The patch cuts off the embedded versions of these libraries from
> OpenJDK source code. In fact, there may exist systems where these
> libraries are not installed. And currently OpenJDK runs perfectly on
> these systems s
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 09:48 -0700, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> In its current form, the icedtea-libraries.patch
> would probably be rejected by Sun, because it
> unconditionally changes to using the system libraries.
> Instead it should be an option.
Yeah, it would be interesting to look into that. A
Hi,
The langtools now use a new ant based build Makefile. This new build
does not obey the setting of MILESTONE to the magic string "fcs" like
the rest of the build to get version strings without an -internal build
string marker.
We use this feature in IcedTea to make sure the version strings of
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 21:42 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> The langtools now use a new ant based build Makefile. This new build
> does not obey the setting of MILESTONE to the magic string "fcs" like
> the rest of the build to get version strings without an -internal bu
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 13:27 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 21:42 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > The langtools now use a new ant based build Makefile. This new build
> > does not obey the setting of MILESTONE to the magic string "fcs" like
> &g
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 11:59 +, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 21/11/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am trying to build the open JDK from source (using the b39 snapshot
> > release) on Ubuntu 8.10, but I get the following error message:
> >
> > In file included f
Hi Douglas,
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 00:27 -0800, Douglas Felt wrote:
> I'm running into multiple errors trying to build openjdk 7 on ubuntu
> 8.10. I downloaded the sources from
> http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/jdk7/promoted/b40/openjdk-7-ea-src-b40-20_nov_2008.zip
> as listed on http://down
Hi Jon,
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 13:19 -0800, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> You do not appear to have signed the Sun Contributor Agreement,
> according to the list at
> https://sca.dev.java.net/CA_signatories.htm#w
>
> If you would like us to use this contribution, you will need to sign
> the SC
Hi Jon,
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 14:39 -0800, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> What about the jtreg patch you have also submitted?
> That would also be covered by the need for an SCA.
If you think so and want to incorporate that patch then I'll take a look
at the SCA this weekend.
I have to admit that I
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 23:26 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 13:19 -0800, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> > You do not appear to have signed the Sun Contributor Agreement,
> > according to the list at
> > https://sca.dev.java.net/CA_signatories.htm#w
>
Hi Dalibor,
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 21:08 +0100, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> On 11/27/08 12:20, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > But please do talk to your legal team to make sure some obvious/trivial
> > rule is added. Requiring the SCA is a pretty high burden really,
> > especially for t
Hi John,
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 10:53 -0800, John Coomes wrote:
> > > 32-bit systems are unaffected (not sure why).
> >
> > It's a bug. The code is basically this:
> > ...
>
> This is http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6679422. FWIW, the
> trivial fix is in jdk7:
>
> http://hg.openjd
Hi Martin,
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 00:52 -0800, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> build 42 has come, and the JDK binaries no longer work on my
> system (32-bit Ubuntu dapper). java -version gives
> an instant crash with "floating point exception".
> Not very friendly.
>
> I have always liked the fact that
Hi Martin,
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 09:32 -0800, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 01:57, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Are there any "official" GPL binaries for OpenJDK these days?
>
> No, but I encourage Sun and encourage others to encourage Sun
> to provi
Hi Martin,
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 10:37 -0800, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 09:53, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Still, if they were around I would indeed take a look and compare stuff
> > a bit with my local builds if I had any strange test failures for
> > ex
Hi Kelly,
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 11:39 -0800, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> These are not official product binaries but early access binary
> snapshots, you can't expect these binaries to be perfect by any
> means. They are also not OpenJDK7 builds but JDK7 builds.
What is the difference between these kin
Hi David,
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 13:46 -0800, David Herron @ Sun wrote:
> Further when we say OpenJDK7 gets a lot of testing, the testing occurs
> on JDK7 binary bundles. We don't explicitly test OpenJDK7 but rely on
> the extreme similarity of the two to assure quality of OpenJDK7.
So what would
Hi Kelly,
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 14:21 -0800, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> The JDK7 early access binary snapshot builds are built from the
> OpenJDK7 sources, plus additional files and repositories we either
> cannot or haven't opened up yet (for various reasons).
Do you have a list of these additional f
Hi Dmitri,
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 17:00 -0800, Dmitri Trembovetski wrote:
> Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 14:21 -0800, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> >> The JDK7 early access binary snapshot builds are built from the
> >> OpenJDK7 sources, plus additional
Hi Kelly,
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 17:45 -0800, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> I'm just a small (maybe medium sized) cog in the machinery around
> here. ;^)
We small and medium sized cogs need to work together to turn this into a
well functioning coding machine!
> Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Martin,
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 15:25 -0700, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> /home/martinrb/ws/openjdk6/build/linux-amd64/langtools/build/classes
> [javac] javac: source release 6 requires target release 1.6
>
> BUILD FAILED
> /usr/local/google/home/martin/ws/openjdk6/langtools/make/build.xml:196:
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 11:43 -0400, Jennifer Zuo wrote:
> This is the repo for deployment group. The directory was there and just
> got populated.
Wow exciting! Great to see this finally being released. But the current
repository seems to only build setup, not yet the full sources yet. Will
all th
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 17:11 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 16 June 2010 17:00, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> > On Jun 16, 2010, at 8:55 AM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> >> So is this where you're putting the open-source plugin? ;-)
> >
> > It would be the right forest for such an effort, in my opini
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 13:10 -0400, Jennifer Zuo wrote:
> Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> > On Jun 16, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >> Now you are confusing me. Is this new deployment forest about the
> >> release of the promised GPL webstart and applet plugi
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 23:33 +, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> As far as I understand that, the binaries provided by Oracle are from
> a proprietary JDK7 code base (and hence have proprietary licensing).
> Oracle don't produce OpenJDK binaries.
There is however a new free swingset3 Demo here:
h
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 11:31 +0530, ramakanth varala wrote:
> My target is to get openjdk build for target board (ARM) .
>
> In the process i thought i would build openjdk first to my host
> machine i.e of fedora 8.
Fedora 8 is very outdated (3 years old). Although IcedTea (7) has been
bootstrappe
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 10:27 +0100, [email protected] wrote:
> Quoting "Mark Wielaard" :
>
> > On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 11:31 +0530, ramakanth varala wrote:
> >> My target is to get openjdk build for target board (ARM) .
> >>
> >> In the process
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 13:11 +, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 18 November 2010 12:44, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > Does the OpenJDK project have any "Field of Use" restrictions? Are
> > "kiosk"/"set top box" style installation allowed?
>
> http://openjdk.java.net/legal/
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 13:39 +, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
> I still don't see any "Field of Use" restrictions though.
That is because there aren't any such restrictions.
> Then again, I don't see any patent license grants at all..
They are all licensed through the GPL for everyone's free use.
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 13:57 +, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
> Excellent, so I am free to use OpenJDK in kiosk and set-top-box style
> systems, without risking patent violation?
If you need legal advise please see your legal counsel. This is just the
mailinglist to discuss build environments. All w
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 16:05 +0100, Volker Simonis wrote:
> In my opinion http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Java_and_patents seems to be a
> strange site and I wouldn't rely too much on it:
>
> - it claims that "GPLv2 includes two implicit patent licenses" but as
> far as I know, this is still a controversia
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 16:05 +0100, Volker Simonis wrote:
> - it claims there is a patent grant trough the "Java Language
> Specification" but if you read that carefully you will notice that it
> "only applies for implementations of Java that fully comply with the
> Java Language Specification" whic
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 11:30 +0100, Patrick Reinhart wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 12:05 +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> > There is a workaround for that: you download the jaxp files yourself,
> > and put them in
> > export ALT_DROPS_DIR=/path/to/some/directory
> >
> > If you can't download them
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 02:23 +, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> I think a move from 3.81 to 3.82 may have trigged the issue here. I'm
> don't know if Fedora 14 also upgrades to that version, but it sounds
> likely.
Yep, Fedora 14 has GNU Make 3.82
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 10:20 -0800, Joe Wang wrote:
> On 11/24/2010 10:13 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> > On Nov 24, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Joe Wang wrote:
> >> By the way, we just finalized a plan on jaxp 1.4.5. We are planning
> >> make an internal release first by FF (12/15) of JDK7, to give you so
> >
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 10:50 -0800, Joe Wang wrote:
> Sorry Mark, and all on build-dev. I didn't pay attention to the
> build-dev, I mean didn't realize the original email was sent to an
> outside alias. It's my fault. My notice was ONLY a heads-up for Kelly. I
> shouldn't have hit reply to all.
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 11:19 -0800, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> I need a reviewer for this change:
>
> 6987107: Add NONFCS_BUILD_INFO variable to add to but not modify
> MILESTONE in version string
> http://javaweb.sfbay.sun.com/~ohair/webrevs/jdk7/nonfcs-version/webrev/
Bit hard to review if the host
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 20:39 -0600, kevin diggs wrote:
> This question is a little ... weird ... but ...
>
> Is the thought of trying to build your sdk with gcj ... heresy (sp?).
> If not please give me ... your thought as to whether it has any chance
> of working. I would think that if it is for c
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 20:52 -0500, Lussier, Denis wrote:
> Aren't the binary plugs still used for vanilla OpenJDK 6 builds that don't
> use Iced Tea?? I know I had to set them up in the OpenSCG build farm for
> Windoze and Linux, last year when I started with Build 16, and they are
> still there
Hi Kelly,
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 14:44 -0800, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> Need reviewers and comments:
>6989472: Provide simple jdk identification information in the
> install image
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/jdk_release/webrev/
CCing distro-pkg-dev since we were recently disc
Hi,
On Mon, January 24, 2011 18:00, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 01/24/2011 04:54 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>> http://download.java.net/jaxp/1.4.5/dev/jaxp-1_4_5-dev.zip
>
> TVM,
I made sure to place a copy in the icedtea drops backup dir just
in case: http://icedtea.classpath.org/download/drops/
Hi Tom,
Tom Marble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The use case I'm trying to work on is Mercurial best practices
> for setting up a multi-user repository.
I just happened to have setup such a beast :) http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/
[*] Let me know if you want access to the machine so you can loo
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> undefined reference to `ParScanClosure::do_oop_work(oopDesc**, bool, bool)'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
I believe that is bug #6567018
"Due missing depenedencies, hotspot doesn't compiles with gcc4."
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?b
Ted Neward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yep, had it pointing to the Import JDK (1.6) instead of the binary plug JDK
> (1.7). Thanks. There's a lot of JDKs needed to build the JDK.
There is also a project to free the JDK from "itself" :) http://iced-tea.org/
(soon to be back at the old url icedte
Hi Alexander,
> I was successfull in building openjdk b18 on my openSUSE 10.2 build service
> account, but unfortunately the Mozilla plugin and javaws were not build.
>
> Any idea how to include this to the build. The binary distribution has both
> so
> I think there has to be a switch somewhe
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 17:04 +0300, Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
> By the way, how about tagging, say, moment of a certain PIT build?
> Returning to this point may be necessary in situations with performance
> bugs (for instance).
I found PIT described in the Glossary (thanks kto!)
http://blogs.sun
Hi Roger,
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 08:07 -0300, Roger Abelenda wrote:
> Hello i'm trying to compile the openjdk machine with open Suse 10.3.
> I'm using the b22 version of openjdk, and jdk 1.6_03 virtual machine
> as boostrap and import_jdk_directory. When i put it tu compile at last
> of the errors
Hi John,
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 03:02 -0800, John Rose wrote:
> Meanwhile, various engineers (like me) are accumulating
> changes into personal repos. I'm using mq so I have maximum
> flexibility of changeset factoring up to the moment of commit.
> You can see a couple of my changes out for review
68 matches
Mail list logo
