Salve,
Basicamente respondendo ao amigo... Eu entendo que sim... Existe problema (de
segurança) em deixar um site em produção rodando no modelo de desenvolvimento,
mas vai funcionar? Sim, vai funcionar perfeitamente.
No início apanhei um poço para entender as formas de instalações do
On Sep 15, 1:24 am, millZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
how is it possible to call functions of a Controller
(EventsController) in another Controller (VisitsController)?
The models are connected with
visits:belongsto Events
events: hasMany Visits
I've tried to call
I'm doing a bit of a hack to get some auto-transaction control for a
set of models. The component is doing it's thing and saving down data
correctly. So in app_model I have:
var $transaction_models =
array('Form','FormTemplate','FormRecord','FormGridRecord','FormExtended','Chain',
The generate_browser() function in the controller is where things are
falling over.
The goal is simply for an uploaded image to have many tags associated
with it, which the user can enter as comma separated list in a
textbox.
I can't see anything wrong with your code actually, what is the
On Sep 15, 12:09 pm, stab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm doing a bit of a hack to get some auto-transaction control for a
set of models. The component is doing it's thing and saving down data
correctly. So in app_model I have:
var $transaction_models =
Now to understand it :p
On Sep 15, 6:22 pm, AD7six [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 15, 12:09 pm, stab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm doing a bit of a hack to get some auto-transaction control for a
set of models. The component is doing it's thing and saving down data
correctly. So in
Hmm well i have looked and it but it is not clear to me at all.. can
anybody please write a proper explanation for it preferable on the
bakery so it will be usefull for others too :)
On Aug 22, 1:10 am, Marcin Domanski aka kabturek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ive read the pdf but i dont expect a
On 9/15/07, Mech7 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm well i have looked and it but it is not clear to me at all.. can
anybody please write a proper explanation for it preferable on the
bakery so it will be usefull for others too :)
another option that I feel gives more flexibility is this
http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/creating-reusable-elements-with-requestaction
so you end up writing lot of small elements and use views to compose
these elements. However you will need to also consider how
requestAction is
Hello all,
I've been looking for a way to speed up requestAction and wanted to
share a hack I came up with. It seems that the main problem is that
the SessionComponent is re-instantiated and a new session is started
each time.
First i modified SessionComponent and added the following function:
Oh Thanks,
that works fine :-).
yours faithfully
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
Hi there
One of my controllers has an action that is only called via
requestaction from within an element. The idea behind is to cache this
element as described in
http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/optimizing-your-cakephp-elements-and-views-with-caching
Generally this approach works fine,
On 9/15/07, Mech7 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But this only displays how to find the extra tags with it, but is
there also an explanation to select on the other table, so for example
specify which tags there should be in a post ?
What do you mean by which tags there should be in a post. If
Very strange because I use the same approach. Are you sure your query
is not in the log because the element is already cached ?
If the element is cached, then your query is not executed
and ...therefore no log.
Hope this helps
Franck
On Sep 15, 6:53 pm, Claudia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Hello,
what is the convention for a private function, which has not to not
work as url?
example
TableController extens AppController {
function getSomeInternalData(){ }// eh
}
so a hyperlink like this has not to result in an error like 'missing
view':
start the function name with an underscore to make it private.
_getSomeInternalData()
On Sep 15, 12:36 pm, millZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
what is the convention for a private function, which has not to not
work as url?
example
TableController extens AppController {
function
Thanks for your quick reply.
Yes, I am sure that no caching takes place.
I don't use any cache parameter at the moment and
I have also checked the cache directory - no files in there.
But I just remembered that I fiddled around with the sqllog so it
does not mess the html of up my pages - maybe
Hi! I use Django at work but am impressed with I think will be a much faster
development cycle possible with CakePHP.
Anyhow, I have just started delving into CakePHP. Right now I get
CakePHP(TM):Rapid Development Framework at the bottom of every page I create.
Is this something I must
To Chris Hartjes and to John David Anderson a very big THANKS for your fast
responses!! This forum really is a brilliant resource, and this is another
huge reason to cook web sites using Cake.
I will definitely put something somewhere on the site that points to CakePHP
as the framework.
Yep! That did the trick. Thanks Chris!
Some basic OO I think. I get spoiled by Cake! ;) That's for sure...
On Sep 15, 10:12 pm, Chris Hartjes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/15/07, Charlie van de Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
// In model Ticker:
$artists = $this-Artist-findById(12);
is
On 9/15/07, Charlie van de Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
// In model Ticker:
$artists = $this-Artist-findById(12);
is not working because the model Artist is not known (?) in model
Ticker. Even with the loadModel('Artist') is is not working.
Anyone any idea?
thnx in advance
You can't
Okay, I have now ruled this down to one function $this-Session-
write('User', test)
I have tried using the database, php and cake session types but all of
them give the same result. As soon as I call the write function
everything page is displayed as blank.
Am I missing something with the
Well from what i have read it is possible to search across HABTM so
you can have tag.name = 'php' as a parameter to search posts within
the post controller.
On Sep 15, 7:09 pm, Chris Hartjes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/15/07, Mech7 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But this only displays how to
so, anyone, please ?
do i have to familiarize myself with the method cake uses to store the
ACL tree in sql to get the parent of any given ARO node? :-(
(...Thanks for the suggestion Gwoo but the database structure (cake
1.1) has no parent_id field in the aros table)
thanks
andrew
On Sep 12,
On 9/15/07, Mech7 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well from what i have read it is possible to search across HABTM so
you can have tag.name = 'php' as a parameter to search posts within
the post controller.
Well, have you tried it? :)
I'm not 100% if that has been implemented, but I'm 100%
then the best for you is to use an email client such as Thunderbird and
use threaded view
Mech7 wrote:
I have to say that i prefer a decent forum over this group, this is
all so unorganized very hard to track your messages.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
Hi Matt,
This usually indicates that there is a script error and cakephp's error
handling under mode DEBUG = 0 prevents the page from displaying. Set DEBUG
in app/config/core.php to be higher than 0 (eg 2), and you will see any
errors that are occurring.
Adam
- Original Message -
Sorry, please delete / ignore my last message about rewriting paths without
mod_rewrite. I just discovered routes in the manual.
Cheers!
- W
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To
Hi!
My host uses apache but does not have mod_rewrite available right now. I'm
wondering if I could be pointed to any information on how to
a) have my application use regular urls
b) have my urls made prettier (without using mod_rewrite)
Are these possible?
Thanks heaps!
- W
but why not use a proper forum?
On 9/16/07, Olivier Percebois-Garve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
then the best for you is to use an email client such as Thunderbird and
use threaded view
Mech7 wrote:
I have to say that i prefer a decent forum over this group, this is
all so unorganized very
This is a proper forum for this group and has been since the beginning.
The topic has been beat to death about having a forum and I still have not
be convinced by anyone that a forum would be any better than this google
group, so my answer will be as it has in all the other threads discussing
some thoughts:
- I think session doesn't get reinstantiated everytime if you set
$security setting to lower.
- if you are using more than three (two?) requestAction calls It gets
significantly slower, since the whole controller (or even more) gets
loaded once more. If you are doing requestActions
Google groups is not a web forum, but is a mailing list (with some poor
features that resemble a webforum)
I can provide some pros of a forum to this gGroup:
- people are more familiar with forums
- forums provide many more useful features gGroups don't (and can't, since
they are mailing lists)
-
Thanks Adam,
I orignally had the debug level at 2 as I was doing development. Then
I turned it to 0 because I thought the debug might be causing the page
to time out. After that I changed it to 3 to see if it would work then
but still no luck.
The page shows up with an HTML header and footer
On 9/16/07, Danijel Kurinčič [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Google groups is not a web forum, but is a mailing list (with some poor
features that resemble a webforum)
Give it up - the change is not happening (and I feel rightly so - I
prefer mailing list over forums)
Of course I shall put my best
On 9/16/07, Chris Hartjes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/15/07, Charlie van de Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
// In model Ticker:
$artists = $this-Artist-findById(12);
is not working because the model Artist is not known (?) in model
Ticker. Even with the loadModel('Artist') is is
but I want to have things tidy in my e-mail account and cakephp group has 36161
messages! *56 a day!* Not enivronmentally friendly to send them around in
vain :)
now I remember, that the interface I have used to be beta version... but I
don't see the switch back option any more... maybe it is
Hi!
I was using :
if ($this-User-save($this-params['form'))
and getting back
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_OBJECT_OPERATOR in
/home/hgi/public_html/tst/wwwroot/cake/app/controllers/users_controller.php on
line 10
My host is using a pre-5.0 version of PHP. Is that my problem? I'm
If the code you pasted is the exact code you are using you are missing the
''.
Code should be:
if ($this-User-save($this-params['form'))
--
/**
* @author Larry E. Masters
* @var string $userName
* @param string $realName
* @returns string aka PhpNut
* @access public
*/
On 9/15/07, CakeONaut
I don't cal myself a heavy user of google group but I haven't
encountered any difficulty so far... I'm using ONLY web interface,
BTW.
This is much faster than yahoo group.
I think the biggest benefit of using google group is that it is part
of google, so searching can take advantage of google's
40 matches
Mail list logo
