Wonderful, thanks very much Larry.
Hopefully the core developers will start using the new forum as their main
outlet for discussion of current development issues and future planning.
I believe over time this visibility of interesting core discussions will
generate new interest in core developme
Thank you Mark for your post.
> The biggest obstacle to all of the improvements that I can see is time…
For me time has been in short supply.
Completely understandable. You should never put in any more time than you
are comfortable giving. I think everyone realizes clearly that you
plans regarding evolution of cake's model and ORM, in light of all the new
stuff now available in open source (eg. Propel, Doctrine...).
--
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials
http://tv.cakephp.org
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help
I think Miles is pointing out there is a bug in php interpreter which can
lose memory under certain circumstances, and through our coding we can
trigger that bug.
So, yes, it appears possible that memory can leak, and that by changing our
code, we can stop it.
Pretty scary, isn't it.
--
Our
2.0, 2.x, 3.x, ...
There's plenty to do.
--
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials
http://tv.cakephp.org
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others
with their CakePHP related questions.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
ca
> What do you have in mind to solve this?
Well, what I had in mind, actually, was precisely not a passive "people are
welcome to fork the repo and patch bugs themselves and submit them for
approval". That might bring us a few isolated contributions here and there,
but that's not really what the
Judging from the lower activity in core development these last few months
(totally understandable given family obligations), me thinks the cake
leadership might benefit from actively solicitating additional help.
Have a look at this:
http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDEV2/Component+Main
I wouldn't make any forecasts, because no one can really know for sure - I
don't even think the devs themselves know.
They are developing out of a labour of love, so what they feel like doing
they do (within some general goals).
If something new comes up they think will be useful, they may de
Mark,
Are you all by yourself on the core development, or is there a team actively
helping you?
--
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials
http://tv.cakephp.org
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others
with their CakePHP related quest
Has anyone, in any of their cake travels, ever come across generic
code for saving deep associations (more than the 2 levels deep which
SaveAll() currently handles?)
Something like a superSaveAll(), where you could do the following:
A hasMany B hasMany C
$this->A->superSaveAll($this->data);
...
Just off the top of my head, for freelance work:
Western countries - $50 - $125/hr.
India/Russia/Africa - $8 - $25/hr.
Where you fit in that range is determined by a host of issues which
you need to objectively decide for yourself.
--
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials
See this:
http://www.slideshare.net/pmjones88/framework-and-application-benchmarking
I love cake, but man, we ain't been doin' so well in them benchmarks.
Cake 1.3 weights in 3x slower than Zend 1.10, and 2x slower than
Symfony 1.4
I can somewhat understand why we are 7x slower than CI 1.7 and
I just went through the new cookbook.
It looks great.
A few cross browser problems:
IE7, FF 3.0 - left navigation table of contents isn't there - perhaps
this is the reason for some people complaining?
Safari 4.0, Chrome 9.0 is fine.
--
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutoria
You'll be lucky if you reach a small fraction of the traffic the sites
in the following thread get:
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/a87ac46d4f590566#
In particular, watch this wonderful presentation on CakePHP TV,
entitled: "CakePHP at massive scale on a budget", by A
I am not refering to scaffolding, but feature filled admin panels with
filtering, sorting/searching, pagination, configurable columns and
labels, display options, field types, associated model support,
default js widgets, breadcrumbs, mutliple save options, etc.
That is not scaffolding.
Wouldn't
Generic crud ops in AppController would work fine for 80% of
controllers.
Controllers which need something unique would override.
Why would I want to bake a project with 40 tables, and end up with 40
copies of nearly the same code in 40 different controllers?
Is it so much harder to type $this->
Although I have been developing with cake for some time (generally
loving every minute), I have never understood the rationale for cake’s
bake utility duplicating so many nearly identical copies of every
action and every view all across your system, in a seemingly total
contradiction of DRY princip
CakePHP is probably the best blend of functionality and intuitiveness
of any framework out there.
It has the best community The people are outstanding, the code is top
notch, the documentation is a dream, the support sites are fantastic.
The cake dev team are all geniuses. The leadership is solid
workaround:
Put
public $actsAs = array();
in the PluginAppModel.
Am I the only one seeing this?
--
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials
http://tv.cakephp.org
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others
with their CakePHP related que
Has anyone noticed behaviors on AppModel are being added twice to
models in plugins?
For example, if I have:
AppModel {
$actsAs = array(A, B, C)
}
PluginAppModel extends AppModel{
// ...no actsAs
}
PluginModel extends PluginAppModel{
// ... no actsAs
}
Then cake will add an $actsAs to PluginM
Firstly, Mark - a tremendous thank you and feelings of admiration for
your tremendous skills, good ideas, and all the time you and the rest
of the team are putting in, to make this great community what it is.
> Leave a comment with your thoughts on the proposed documentation changes.
Ability to
Say you have two plugins, A and B.
It is fairly simple for a component/behavior/helper in plugin B to
inherit from a component/behavior/helper in A by doing an
App::import(), then extending.
But, it is more complicated for controllers/models in plugin B to
inherit from their peers in plugin A, si
Our flash developer wants to create a totally flash front end to our
cake app.
He is asking us to change our view layer to render XML instead of
HTML, for all views, including forms.
The flash front end will build the forms based on the XML it receives,
then submit the form in the format cake exp
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Joshua Muheim wrote:
> > Doing it right now... :-)
>
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:08 PM, keymaster wrote:
> >> Pierre Martin's: "Using and Reusing Plugins", given at cakefest.
>
> >>http://www.slideshare.net/real
Pierre Martin's: "Using and Reusing Plugins", given at cakefest.
http://www.slideshare.net/real34/using-reusingplugins
I tried downloaded it for reference and later re-viewing, but alas, it
is encoded as an Apple Keynote presentation and I am on a PC.
Does anyone have a ppt version of it?
Or, w
Well put, Rumkuchen.
One might also mention how much you will learn through the use of the
framework, interaction with the community, and studying the
contributed plugins.
On Dec 4, 11:28 am, Rumkuchen wrote:
> invest 100 hours learning overhead at the beginning -> then you are as
> fast as with
That seems to be true, but it is pretty hard to understand the
rationale.
On Dec 6, 8:51 am, Amit Badkas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You are right, saveAll() only save direct relations.
>
> Amit Badkas
>
> PHP Applications for E-Biz:http://www.sanisoft.com
>
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Dave Maharaj
Seyed,
No prob, dude.
We'll fly a couple of the cakephp core developers to your apartment.
They'll walk you through everything, step by step, just like you
wanted.
You'll be editing cakephp files in no time. Don't worry.
Just a thought, would you like some Netbeans staff to be there too?
You ne
John Steele,
Rather than continuing on this thread, where you'll probably get (in
my opinion) unnecessarily get heckled, why not create a lighthouse
ticket and attach a small, reproduceable testcase that has the
problem, the db and as concise a slice of your app as possible.
Cake is solid, very s
The following always works for me when I'm totally baffled:
Export older revisions of your code from svn/git, until you find the
revision in which the problem starts.
A bit of analysis of the changes in that revision should point out the
issue.
If it's a bug in cake, try and simplify to the sma
Weird.
Things I might try:
1. clear all cached files, models, cake core persistent files, and
session files in tmp/ then try again
2. try with debug off, then turn it back on.
3. do you have any weird, unusual inheritance going on in the app,
with models?
4. check your associations
5. check your
At the bottom of each bakery page is the new tagline:
"Powered by Blazon © 2010 Cake Development Corporation"
Also, there is the following tweet by phpNut:
@AD7six Blazon and Inq announced @ #CakeFest use all of the plugins
@CakeDC has released. The apps will be released soon. /cc @fahad19
Soun
I need to do an extract and conversion of some data from an older
windows-based MS-SQL legacy system managed by another company, into
our existing cake-based LAMP system.
I don't think the data volume is very high. A few thousand rows, tops.
All English. Simple product data.
Has anyone gone thro
In cake1.3, has as anyone tried to group related plugins together, in
a subfolder, under the plugins/ directory?
eg.
plugins/
ecommerce/
... all my ecommerce related plugins ...
cms/
... all my cms related plugins ...
I was not able to get cake to accept thi
The context is a standard ecommerce platform.
A Country hasMany States.
Some Countries have no States.
A Region can be made up of either:
1. entire Countries, or
2. States within a Country.
The following Data Model does not work:
Region HABTM Country hasMany State
... because there are Countrie
Class BaseGamesController extends AppController
Class GameOneController extends BaseGamesController
Class GameTwoController extends BaseGamesController
Inheritance is one way to share common functionality among many
controllers.
The cake way, however, is through components.
So, you would put your
> we usually do two full installs of cake so that things are fully separated
Don't understand why you'd want two copies of your code.
What is it that has you so worried, you are bending over backwards to
protect?
> The biggest benefit in my opinion, though is that you can work on
> admin function
Create a separate admin.ctp layout, with associated js, css, images,
etc.
Bake your controllers and models without admin_ operations.
Create generic admin_xxx crud functions in appController.
Create a single admin_index element used by all controllers.
Use admin routing to require a login as admini
If anyone wants to reaffirm their commitment to the intelligence of
cake, spend an hour reading the zend framework quickstart.
You would not believe the amount of code and configuration involved in
getting a simple ZF app up and running with a single controller/model
and two actions/views (index,
> I think it would be nice to see cake 2.0 follow Li3 and Symfony's
> direction and push the boundaries a bit by moving to 5.3> only.
Anyway you cut it, regardless of whether cake 2.0 is >5.3 only, or
5.2+, there is still an incredibly urgent need for an interim release
to get the antiquated php4
Unless there is a good reason to integrate Wordpress, I would stay
far away.
You just don't need all that extra complication interacting with your
cake install.
If you aren't able to invest the time to build something in cake, have
a look at http://croogo.org/
Your life will be much simpler beca
I saw this today on php.net:
=
PHP 5.2.14 Released!
[22-Jul-2010] This release marks the end of the active support for
PHP 5.2. Following this release the PHP 5.2 series will receive no
further active bug maintenance. Security fixes for PHP 5.2 might b
The "right" approach, I think, might be to ask Mark Story to include a
debug info panel in his debugKit toolbar, or alternatively use
fireCake to send it to the firefox console.
Here is the debugKit lighthouse page. You may want to open an
enhancement ticket (or develop it yourself and submit it).
Not so clear what you're describing.
Sounds like an accordion widget in javascript, not something server
side.
Do you mean something like this?
http://thedesigned.com/2009/09/25/10-examples-of-impressive-jquery-accordions/
http://docs.jquery.com/UI/Accordion
If you wanted to have a module syste
Very interested in this.
Please update this list when it's up.
Much appreciated.
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with
their CakePHP related questions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to
See this thread for a direct solution to your problem (use a finder
query):
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/msg/c10840be78a34df0
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with
their CakePHP related questions.
You received this message because you are sub
See the following thread describing some of the highest traffic cake
sites...
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/a87ac46d4f590566/e2c097afb7eda061?lnk=gst&q=cakephp+high+traffic+sites#
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with
their
Anyone know the reason why the saveAll() and multi-record form record
formats are the same, but the format of data returned from a
find(’all’) is different, such that a set::combine() is required
before sending to the view?
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others
My first guess would be the css file is not where the code expects it.
Use firebug to see what css files are being requested, and from what
locations.
On Jun 16, 5:10 pm, Jeremy Burns | Class Outfit
wrote:
> Wow - that's a surprise. I wouldn't have expected any degradation just by
> creating a f
being removed or replaced can be marked as deprecated in
> upcoming 1.x releases to give developers time to change their code.
> So if you're using 1.3 right now and are removing the use of
> deprecated methods from your application, you'll be prepared for the
> 2.0 migrati
Please don't throw eggs, but..
...after looking over the 2.0 roadmap, I am wondering about the
relative benefit of major "shock and awe" releases vs. the
continuation of the successful 1.x pattern of smaller, but still
significant, incremental releases (where applicable).
I am a tad concerned the
Our orders need to maintain information about the addresses orders
were delivered to, the coupons used, the price of the individual
products at the time the order was placed, etc.
I have Product, Coupon and Address models which store all the
respective info.
Once an order is placed, I need to “fr
Thanks very much.
>From a certain perspective, this 1.3.2 release, coming so quickly
after the 1.3.1, says more about this project's commitment to quality
than perhaps a regular release does. A problem was identified to be
significant enough to warrant an exception to the process, and you
guys sto
Obviously one can unset the 'id' field, but there are times we want a
value in the id field, yet still not have the form helper insert that
value into the url.
In the admin_index view, I have the following simple filter form.
echo $form->create($model, array(
'url' => array_merge(
Jamie - yes, it does feel good to know someone else is doing things
the way you did. I'm sure others are too.
AD7six - You said:
> what do you do when in app project you don't want something you're inheriting?
You 404 all actions you don't want to inherit.
AppController::Return404( array( ...
plugins are)?
I am really glad and appreciative of you taking so much time to
discuss these issues, AD7. You're experience is well known, as are
your numerous contributions to our community.
On May 11, 7:02 pm, AD7six wrote:
> On May 11, 5:30 pm, keymaster wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> PS additional app paths and plugins don't solve the same problem.
>
Firstly, thanks for these responses. I appreciate it.
Plugins and Additional paths may not solve the same problem, I agree,
and that's sort of what I am trying to determine, ie. whether I should
keep all my code as additional
g are the visible "features"
> residing in the core.
>
> The one hack I made to the 1.2 core was to let urls get a bit shorter
> by not requiring the namespacing part of controllers in plugins. /
> pizza/pizza_orders is messier than /pizza/orders But this was purely
> "cosmet
In the past (cake 1.1, and to an extent cake 1.2) there were
limitations to plugins which prevented their use as a means of
modularizing your app's code.
For example,
- plugins couldn't access or extend app's models
- code in the app couldn't access a plugin's models
- plugin did not have callba
In the past (cake 1.1, and to an extent cake 1.2) there were
limitations to plugins which prevented their use as a means of
modularizing your app's code.
For example,
- plugins couldn't access or extend app's models
- code in the app couldn't access a plugin's models
- plugin did not have callba
Jeremy, perhaps you should add this, with the solution, as a ticket in
lighthouse.
On May 7, 8:55 am, Jeremy Burns wrote:
> I have resolved this (thanks to designvoid for pointing the way).
>
> It was indeed due to secure cookies. As soon as the site steps out of SSL
> back into non-SSL, the co
I understand outsourcing the SCM to github, the tickets to Lighthouse,
the forum to Google Groups, and using cakePHP.org as the glue which
ties everything together. To me that is absolutely the right way to
go, as it frees up manpower to develop framework code.
Perhaps we need a better way of trac
Congratulations and a big ** Thank You ** to the entire cakePHP team!
On Apr 25, 11:36 am, Nejra wrote:
> Congratulations on yet another great release!
>
> Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organd help others with
> their CakePHP related questions.
>
> You received this mess
At this point croogo is pretty much the front contender, way ahead of
the pack. It also seems very well thought out.
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with
their CakePHP related questions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl
If all you are using is the joomla core (articles, users), without any
(or too many) extensions, you might try something like migrating all
your Joomla articles and users straight from the joomla database into
a cake-based cms eg. croogo ( http://croogo.org/ ) database, then
continuing forward from
I'd like to build a generic payment interface in cake with the ability
to easily plug-in several different gateway implementations.
The stubs would be things like: Authorize.Net, LinkPoint, Verisign,
paypal, GoogleCO, 2CO, etc.
I'm not sure which of several architectural approaches to choose
with
In a few months, with this rate of progress, even if a stable release
has not been declared, I would say there would be no question, go with
1.3.
A few months ago, I would have also said there would be no question,
stay with 1.2.
We are in a somewhat gray period right now, for the next little whi
Have any of you ever been presented with the following challenge by a
client:
"You are offering to build my site on top of your custom CMS based on
cakephp. I am worried that by not going with a standard cms like
Drupal, we will
www.scratch.mit.edu
==> ranked 1,153 worldwide by Alexa.
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with
their CakePHP related questions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email
While debugging an ajax problem on IE8 which was not happening on
Firefox, I determined that the different caching policies of browsers
can cause real headaches sometimes.
While things were working consistently great in Firefox, in IE8 ajax
was behaving at times very erratic (while other times it
So far, the short list of cake's absolutely largest known sites, is:
addons.mozilla.com
==> ranked 308 worldwide by alexa:
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/mozilla.org#trafficstats
(rumored to be changing to a python based platform).
hotscripts.com
==> ranked 2,022 worldwide by alexa:
http://www.a
Bingo !
Thank you.
Surprisingly, there were quite a few cake files in the core with
trailing white spaces, as well.
I opened a ticket in lighthouse on this, attached David's shell, and
suggested perhaps they may want to include this shell as part of the
regular test run:
http://cakephp.lighthou
Spent more time on this bug than I should have, but ...
I had a problem which I tracked down to two non-printable characters
of whitespace, inserted at the beginning of data sent to the client,
as a response to an ajax operation.
Now, where would *you* look to find how two unprintable characters
These sites don't have the enviable alexa traffic rank of 312 that
mozilla.org has, but are still relatively high.
Anyone know a cake site with higher rankings?
cyclingnews.com (alexa traffic rank: 10,400 worldwide)
totalfilm.com(alexa traffic rank: 19,795 worldwide)
Check out the new CakeP
This is not meant to be a post on "evaluating cake's performance" or
anything like that. I use cake alot and have no issues.
I also know that for those who utilize cake 1.2's various features for
performance optimization to the fullest, there are very few issues of
performance remaining even for
Cake 1.1 underpinned addons.mozilla.org for years. Cake 1.2 is much
more powerful than 1.1, and cake 1.3/2.0 is even more so.
In php land, CakePHP is by far the most enterprise ready framework.
The cakephp community is by far the largest.
I'm sure large apps have left the other frameworks too, f
Not sure where best to post this, but ... there needs to be a "Resend
Verification Email" link on the new questions site or people whose
verification email is lost in transit are up a creek with no paddle.
On Nov 11, 2:44 pm, Graham Weldon wrote:
> Cool :-) Lots of signups happening. Nice to se
> Please tell what the benefit of this is?
A better benefit might be to build a bridging component to the
hundreds of Joomla templates (without using the Joomla CMS codebase).
Other than the great looking templates, once I got involved with cake,
I didn't see much benefit to Joomla anymore. Very
The more I read about flex, the more I feel compelled to question
whether I should be staying with HTML/js/CSS etc. for the front ends
of the apps I build, or switching to ActionSript 3.0/Flex/Flex builder
(of course continuing to interface with cakePHP on the server side) ?
Assuming money/learni
How can one distinguish between:
1. a new user coming to the site for the first time, and
2. a returning user whose session has expired?
The returning user needs to be informed his session has expired. The
new user should be allowed to continue on his merry way.
Thanks.
--~--~-~--~~-
Ahh, the recurring million dollar question:
Should you start with Joomla and add your custom stuff as a Joomla
component, or build everything from "scratch" with cake?
I've spent far too much time in the past agonizing over this.
My own conclusion was if you're not in the web development busine
Have a look at this:
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/f62a9375756ca505/10ffe11cf7d3d4f0?lnk=gst&q=factory+pattern#
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To pos
Personally, I don't think using an integrated cake-Joomla approach is
such a great idea.
What do you gain?
Creating article management capabilities is trivial in cake. Do you
really want all of Joomla code for that?
Perhaps you are enticed by all the Joomla extensions? I can understand
that, bu
> We've got a few good goals for the upcoming version...
http://thechaw.com/cakephp/wiki/1.3/Hit_List
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@goo
I recently went through the tedious process of converting a high end
custom Joomla template (complete with css, js, mootools effects, etc.)
over to an existing cake app.
The site looked really nice afterwards, and I thought - hey, it sure
would be great to be able to leverage all the nice commerc
I like Grigri's generic controller approach for eliminating empty
controllers:
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/7638b690ae0545ff/1845d3c1c30d3a03?lnk=gst&q=generic+controller#1845d3c1c30d3a03
disclaimer - although it's on my list to implement, I haven't gotten
to it y
Agree:
- php4 support++
- upload++
- callbacks on associative queries++
Also:
- saveAll() limitations (currently limited to one level deep)
- more configurability - eg. configure which controller subfolder a
particular controller/model is located in (currently has to search
through all folde
Had a look.
It's true, it's small and easy to learn, but what's the point? It
barely does anything.
Not putting it down though. Like anything else , it will be useful to
people looking for that kind of a thing.
I ain't one of 'em.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
AD7, how is your MI-Base project coming anyways?
Would you care at any point to blog about your MI-Base project
(architecture, tradeoffs, etc.)?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To p
Read the cookbook, go through the example applications at the end,
and things will clear up.
http://book.cakephp.org/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email
Have you tried profiling your app to see where time is going?
Is the bottleneck on the server side?
Or is it the http requests due to your js, css, flash, images, and
other client side stuff?
If you come to this list with more specific information, you'll
probably get a better response.
--~--
You have these options:
1. put the common function in a component.
2. put the common function in appController.
3. use requestAction() - (not good practise)
4. combine all the actions of both controllers into a single
controller
5. put the function in a model (if applicable) and have both
control
These links may help:
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/5339fd41fa534323#
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/5339fd41fa534323#
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
> Will saveAll work for model on Level three?
Not yet. You're going to have to do some looping for now.
Maybe in 1.3?...
https://trac.cakephp.org/ticket/5937#preview
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Have a look at this:
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/7638b690ae0545ff/53a804265793ace3?lnk=gst&q=crud#
The more I think about it, the more sold I am on grigri's approach in
the above thread.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this mess
I'd define the following basic crud operations operations in
appController to work generically independant of controller/model:
add(), edit(), del(), view()
admin_add(), admin_edit(), admin_del(), admin_view()
Then, all your profile controllers would inherit from appController,
and:
delete_quot
I think the above stats should be sufficient.
As an anecdotal supplement - the top sites built with cake are in a
class larger and more complex than most, if not all, of us would ever
get the opportunity to develop in our lifetime.
You don't have to worry about building a site with cake.
You sh
> However, I do strongly advise _against_ using
> the behavior's Single Table inheritance option. In my opinion it is a
> very bad design/solution for subclassing purposes.
If one was just coming out of University having taken a database
course or two, or an OO course or two, then yes, you would
I never really understood the reason for this hyper-aggressive loading
of everything and it's brother, whether you want it or not.
It sure would be nice to have the ability to turn off the auto
loading, and do a manual loading of only what you need in your
action something like a Containable
> ... visitors to CakePHP.com.
correction: visitors to book.cakephp.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
1 - 100 of 310 matches
Mail list logo
