So transfer the ownership of the domain and use the hosting you have
purchased for another enterprise of your own.
Why should your outlay for the hosting be covered by the sale of this
domain?
Consider the benefit you have gained from using cake.
- S
On 12 November 2011 00:51, Sandy wrote
On 11/11/11 18:33, "mike karthauser" wrote:
> If this is the case then why not offer the domain at a nominal price - ie 20
> dollars rather than 200? If your intention is to keep it away from the domain
> squatters then passing it on to someone to use it is worth that. Otherwise let
> it expire a
The trademark owner can contact the ICANN and ask for the domain*
> suspension, right?
>
> * Wich contains the trademarked name
>
>
Thiago,
Yes that is what we have done before.
--
Larry E. Masters
--
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials
http://tv.cakephp.org
Check out t
he auction is because I got into GoDaddy Auctions for free as a
> > bundle with another purchase. I'm not interested in more.
>
> > On Nov 12, 4:38 am, phpMagpie wrote:
> > > > Sandy: Yes, this domain is mine
>
> > > Just wanted to know if it was you tr
a
> bundle with another purchase. I'm not interested in more.
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 12, 4:38 am, phpMagpie wrote:
> > > Sandy: Yes, this domain is mine
> >
> > Just wanted to know if it was you trying to make a profit from a
> > CakePHP related domain, or if you w
into GoDaddy Auctions for free as a
bundle with another purchase. I'm not interested in more.
On Nov 12, 4:38 am, phpMagpie wrote:
> > Sandy: Yes, this domain is mine
>
> Just wanted to know if it was you trying to make a profit from a
> CakePHP related domain, or if you
* *»* br.linkedin.com/in/thiagobelem/pt*
Assando Sites*, curso de CakePHP *»* assando-sites.com.br
2011/11/12 phpMagpie
> > Sandy: Yes, this domain is mine
> Just wanted to know if it was you trying to make a profit from a
> CakePHP related domain, or if you were informing us of someon
> Sandy: Yes, this domain is mine
Just wanted to know if it was you trying to make a profit from a
CakePHP related domain, or if you were informing us of someone else
who was selling this domain?
> In my opinion its better for a CakePHP programmer to use it and not > some
> domain squ
That is because I have paid several years of hosting in advance. At
$200 I would come out even.
On Nov 11, 12:33 pm, mike karthauser wrote:
> If this is the case then why not offer the domain at a nominal price - ie 20
> dollars rather than 200? If your intention is to keep it away from the do
If this is the case then why not offer the domain at a nominal price - ie 20
dollars rather than 200? If your intention is to keep it away from the domain
squatters then passing it on to someone to use it is worth that. Otherwise let
it expire and I'll grab it then :)
Incidentally, as a develop
http://simmonstrialpractice.com/fair-use-of-trademark-in-domain-name-ninth-circuit/
Seems like nominative use to me. Though I do agree that the Cake
Foundation should protect its rights.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:18 AM, phpMagpie wrote:
> Is this your domain?
>
> On Nov 9, 7:20 pm, Sandy wrot
Yes, this domain is mine. I am a CakePHP developer and wanted to blog
about my experience, but I have not been able to find time to do so.
I re-researched and feel fair, nominative use is valid in this case.
Nominative fair use is established when:
- The product cannot be readily identified wit
Is this your domain?
On Nov 9, 7:20 pm, Sandy wrote:
> I thoroughly researched this beforehand and this falls under "fair
> use" for trademarks as it is used nominatively and does not cause
> confusion. If not, alot of similar websites would also have to be
> shutdown (Google "photoshop tutorials
Sandy,
I am not sure where you checked on this being "fair use" but I an guarantee
it does not fall under fair use.
You have the option of removing it yourself, or as I said, I can have a
take down notice sent. The Cake Software Foundation, Inc protects its
trademarks and copyrights it owns and d
I thoroughly researched this beforehand and this falls under "fair
use" for trademarks as it is used nominatively and does not cause
confusion. If not, alot of similar websites would also have to be
shutdown (Google "photoshop tutorials", "excel tutorials" or similar
to see a great list of website
I investigated beforehand and this is fair use of a trademark. I'm not
trying to impersonate or cause confusion among CakePHP users by making
a CakePHP tutorial site... the word CakePHP is used nominatively.
If this were true, then many sites that contain trademarked names
would have to be closed
indeed, pretty cocky :)
nothing against making some profit using software made with cake.
but this is not a place to put advertising and THEN profit from it.
pretty soon everybody puts some ads in here. and it ain't gonna be no
help forum anymore..
On 8 Nov., 05:52, "Larry E. Masters" wrote:
>
I like how people use a registered trademark ( http://tinyurl.com/cjgr6yf )
and then try to profit from it. Should I send you a letter now or do you
prefer to remove it yourself?
--
Larry E. Masters
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Sandy Wilkins
wrote:
>
> Hey in case anyone is interested, thi
Hey in case anyone is interested, this domain is for sale (or auction,
not sure) at $200: www.cakephptutorials.com
Go more info here:
https://auctions.godaddy.com/trpItemListing.aspx?ci=44661&miid=59169857
--
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials
http://tv.cakephp.org
Ch
19 matches
Mail list logo
