That depends on what $this->Recipe->recursive is set to.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Steven Wright wrote:
>
> Hi Brian one more thing for clarification. My expectation is that if I
> define the relationships correctly and my DB table are keyed correctly when
> I call f
Hi Brian one more thing for clarification. My expectation is that if I
define the relationships correctly and my DB table are keyed correctly when
I call for a read all from the Recipe model I should all related information
from all tables no matter how deep the relationship. Is that correct
Ok I get it. Thanks man I really appreciate your time.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: cake-php@googlegroups.com [mailto:cake-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of brian
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 1:13 PM
To: cake-php@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Relationships - HABTM
Both Recipe
ent: Monday, January 19, 2009 12:26 PM
> To: cake-php@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Relationships - HABTM
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:57 AM, rhythmicde...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>
>> I have been making some pretty good headway on defining the
>> relationships for my
t: Re: Relationships - HABTM
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:57 AM, rhythmicde...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> I have been making some pretty good headway on defining the
> relationships for my models. However I am not getting some data that I
> expect to get. This may be due to my relationship
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:57 AM, rhythmicde...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> I have been making some pretty good headway on defining the
> relationships for my models. However I am not getting some data that I
> expect to get. This may be due to my relationship definitions or a
> misu
I have been making some pretty good headway on defining the
relationships for my models. However I am not getting some data that I
expect to get. This may be due to my relationship definitions or a
misunderstanding of what CakePHP will do for me. I am hoping one you
can point me in the right
I have a Blog Model & I have a Tag Model. The Tag model is a HABTM
relationship to the Blog model. If I add some tags to a particular
blog post and save it using saveAll and then I go back and then try to
remove all the tags, cakePHP will not remove them all. However if I
only attempt to remove a
On Jan 6, 9:04 am, Jonathan wrote:
> On Jan 5, 12:42 am, Rob Wilkerson wrote:
>
> > Did you ever find a solution to this?
>
> Not really. I ended up writing my own SQL-queries (using model-
>
> >query).
>
> (Note that the return data from the "query" contains table names - not
> model names as
On Jan 5, 12:42 am, Rob Wilkerson wrote:
> Did you ever find a solution to this?
Not really. I ended up writing my own SQL-queries (using model-
>query).
(Note that the return data from the "query" contains table names - not
model names as with "find").
M.v.h.
Jonathan
--~--~-
Jonathan wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I can see that ORDER'ing related models have been discussed before,
> but I haven't found a solution.
>
> I basically have 3 tables/models: Item, User, Person
>
> Item has $hasAndBelongsToMany = array('User');
>
> and User has $belongsTo = array('Person');
>
> Person has
d.wordpress.com/2008/09/24/saving-extra-fields-in-the-jo...
>
> The data saves, but each time I submit the form, it doesn't delete the
> existing relationships in the join table before adding new ones so the
> join table keeps on growing. Both of my models (niche and website)
>
Hi,
I have a form which is saving data to a join table using the method
found here:
http://teknoid.wordpress.com/2008/09/24/saving-extra-fields-in-the-join-table-for-habtm-models/
The data saves, but each time I submit the form, it doesn't delete the
existing relationships in the join
You need the corresponding belongsTo for your hasOne, and then you
should get the related data as $this->Ingredient->IngredientType.
On Dec 21, 3:55 pm, "rhythmicde...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> I am having an issue trying to figure out how to get data from a model
> that has a relationship with the cu
I am having an issue trying to figure out how to get data from a model
that has a relationship with the current model.
I have an ingredients table and ingredient_types table
I have an Ingredients model and an IngredientTypes model
I have an IngredientsController and an IngredientTypesController
Not sure if it would work, but have you tried creating a HABTM
relationship with itself? May have to setup your own join table if
cake doesn't create a users_users table.
On Dec 18, 11:46 am, overture wrote:
> If I have a 'users' table which represents a set of employees and I
> want to assign
7;',
'deleteQuery' => '',
'insertQuery' => ''
)
);
Where Supervisor extends User (or just replace the className with
'User').
On Dec 19, 8:38 am, overture wrote:
> I
I had looked at the manual already. Which bit covers 'self'
referential relationships?
On Dec 19, 1:46 pm, Smelly_Eddie wrote:
> http://book.cakephp.org/view/78/Associations-Linking-Models-Together
>
> On Dec 18, 2:46 pm,overture wrote:
>
>
>
> > If I have
http://book.cakephp.org/view/78/Associations-Linking-Models-Together
On Dec 18, 2:46 pm, overture wrote:
> If I have a 'users' table which represents a set of employees and I
> want to assign a given employee mutiple supervisora (who are obviously
> also in the 'users' table) then I have a situa
If I have a 'users' table which represents a set of employees and I
want to assign a given employee mutiple supervisora (who are obviously
also in the 'users' table) then I have a situation where there is a
self referential relationship. Not only that it is also many to
many.
How do I achieve th
Hi.
I can see that ORDER'ing related models have been discussed before,
but I haven't found a solution.
I basically have 3 tables/models: Item, User, Person
Item has $hasAndBelongsToMany = array('User');
and User has $belongsTo = array('Person');
Person has a field "name", and when I retrieve
Thanks guys! Your advice was definitely helpful
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send em
The issue is that you are overwriting the $hasMany array with each new
declaration so only the last hasMany relationship will be created
(Upload). As Milmar says you need to group multiple relation types
into a single array as follows:
var $hasMany = array('Article', 'Event', 'Post', 'Price',
I suggest you try the "bake" feature to generate the codes to minimize
any syntax issues.
About hasMany, it has other parameters that might need to be set, and,
I think you cannot define multiple hasMany variables (just put all
related models in an array).
e.g.
class User extends AppModel {
var
I'm building a basic CMS and I have a 'users' table that is related to
more than one other table. The 'users' table is related to these other
tables by a '$hasMany' relationship. I did the bare minimum in terms
of setting up my models and databases using the $scaffold feature so I
could be sure ev
er?
>
> > > On Nov 23, 8:10 pm, "James.Diss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > controllers;
>
> > > > users_controller;
>
> > > > class UsersController extends AppController {
> > > >
> var $name = 'Users';
> > > var $scaffold;
>
> > > }
>
> > > posts_controller;
>
> > > class PostsController extends AppController {
> > > var $name = 'Posts';
> >
ler {
> > var $name = 'Posts';
> > var $scaffold;
>
> > }
>
> > 'hitting' the controllers means using the url.http:///posts
> > or http:///users
>
> > As for using Bake...at the m
> var $scaffold;
>
> > > }
>
> > > posts_controller;
>
> > > class PostsController extends AppController {
> > > var $name = 'Posts';
> > > var $scaffold;
>
> > > }
>
> >
var $name = 'Posts';
> > var $scaffold;
>
> > }
>
> > 'hitting' the controllers means using the url.http:///posts
> > or http:///users
>
> > As for using Bake...at the moment I'm just working with a couple of
> >
.at the moment I'm just working with a couple of
> models and controllers, surely throwing views into the mix is going to
> complicate the problem I had, which isn't regarding speed or getting
> to grips with how this works (I have ten y
how this works (I have ten years of PHP and 2 years of
Java) but being vaguely confused how a small 'unit test' of how cake
is supposed to operate is failing so fundamentally. What is this,
fifteen lines of application code?
Anyhow, thanks for the debug tip; I can see from the resultin
> > // Groups model
> > var $hasMany = array(
> > 'UserGroup' => array(
> > 'className' => 'UserGroup',
> > 'foreignKey' => 'group_id',
> > 'limit' => '5',
> >
=> 'UserGroup',
> > 'foreignKey' => 'group_id',
> > 'limit' => '5',
> > 'dependent' => true
> > )
> > );
>
> > // Link to users
&
'limit' => '5',
> 'dependent' => true
> )
> );
>
> // Link to users
> var $hasAndBelongsToMany = array(
> 'User' =>
> array(
> 'className'
'User',
'joinTable' => 'user_groups',
'foreignKey' => 'group_id',
'associationForeignKey' => 'user_id',
'conditions'=> &
The failing isn't really in understanding the relationships, just
something odd is happening that I want to get a perspective on as a
beginner.
I have two models with backing database tables. The models are;
// app/models/User.php
class User extends AppModel {
var $name =
Hi folks,
After evaluating Cake for a rather large back office application I
think I've fallen in love, yet something still mystifies me regarding
the formHelper.
Say I have two models (Campaign and Offer),
Campaign -> hasMany -> Offer
Offer -> belongsTo -> Campaign
When editing a campaign rec
Ha Ha!
Started again from scratch using the Cake Bake console and it all
seems to be working. A few errors again when adding friends but should
be fixable.
In case it's of use to anyone here's how it's all set up now...
DATABASE...
Users table... id | username | password
Profiles table... id |
Thanks Bernardo - that makes sense. I think I might drop the concept
of admirers and have an "accepted" state for friendships.
This all works well when displaying user data, a user model
automatically has data about previous friendships but I still can't
add new friends. The best I can get when I
I imagine it should work if you use different join tables for each HABTM
relationship. Regardless of cakephp this is what I imagine you'd need in
this situation (imagine what would happen if a user is both a friend and
an admirer of another user).
var $hasAndBelongsToMany = array(
Dear All,
Forgive me if this is covered elsewhere. I'm playing with cakePHP as
an alternative to Rails and am getting to grips with it by creating a
really simple social network app.
I've got some nice authentication and user profiles sorted and that's
all displaying great but now I've come to a
Weights belongsTo both Categories and Courses
Categories hasMany Weights
Courses hasMany Weigths
BelongsTo means the model that belongsTo something also has the
foreign keys "in itself" (Weights.course_id).
For hasMany THE OTHER model is supposed to have the foreign key
(Courses hasMany Weigh
I am getting lost in semantics and need a guide. I'm writing an app
that keeps track of grades for students in multiple courses.
Depending on the type of course, there will be different categories of
grades ('Lab Assignments','Oral Presentation', 'Programming
Assignments', ...) and there will be
The issue is basically that I have 2 models (Sample and
FormationsSite) that share the same parent (Site) and are in turn
related to each other by virtue of 1 field on one (Sample.depth) and 2
fields on the other (FormationsSite.formtop and
FormationsSite.formbot).
I need some way to express that
Your question is a bit long, so I'm not quite sure what you're asking.
It sounds to me like you're having trouble finding() stuff with the
condition being on an associated model?
For HABTMs or very deeply nested associations Cake indeed doesn't seem
to handle it very gracefully yet.
I recently
What I'm trying to model is the following: I have a number of Sites
which represent wells. From these sites at certain depths Samples are
collected. Each Sample contains a number of different Subjects
(specimens) found in varying quantities. These are represented by the
SubjectHits model in the Su
learn. :)
But You've done great job by understanding and answering all those
questions. :P
This post cleared many things out and I'll make this post my road map
for relationships. And currently I don't have any questions...just
lots of testing now. :)
--~--~-~--~~
Nothing to add apart from props to Rafael for an excellent answer.
On Aug 23, 2:05 am, Rafael Bandeira aka rafaelbandeira3
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, I almost slept, you should try to more clear and less verborragic,
> so many explanation just messed up things more and more...
> And you sho
Oh, I almost slept, you should try to more clear and less verborragic,
so many explanation just messed up things more and more...
And you should do 2 things when you can't speak a language : 1) look
for groups with the same language of yours and 2) say your
nacionality, so members from the same co
Hi,
First post here and also that text was right "probably this question
has been asked before" etc. :)
I must say that first experiences with Cake are wonderful... seems to
save lots of time. Although, one part is totally confusing for
me...it's the hasOne, hasMany, belongsTo... part. So I deci
Hi All,
I've been following lately, and I must say I'm very pleased with the
framework. Currently, I'm having a different project where there
should be many to many relationships between 3 tables.
This particular situation is for user management purposes. The User
r
hange the
> textbox to a drop down select list.
>
> On Jul 15, 10:35 pm, "Renan Gonçalves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Recognize relationships based on InnoDB relationships is planned to CakePHP
> > 2.0.https://trac.cakephp.org/wiki/Proposals/2.0ToDoList
Try putting some data in your groups table. Cake will change the
textbox to a drop down select list.
On Jul 15, 10:35 pm, "Renan Gonçalves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Recognize relationships based on InnoDB relationships is planned to CakePHP
> 2.0.https://trac.cake
Recognize relationships based on InnoDB relationships is planned to CakePHP
2.0.
https://trac.cakephp.org/wiki/Proposals/2.0ToDoList
[]'s
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Mech7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does anybody know what could be wrong.. if I would bake my mode
Does anybody know what could be wrong.. if I would bake my model /
controllers / views for users
it will just put a input text box for usergroup_id and in the model it
just says:
Here is the table setup..
---
CREAT
Thanks for the pr(); tip. Made me get a grip on the whole relationship
thing. My dogsizes were actually hasMany and my races were belongsTo,
not the other way around as I started out. I think I get the concept
now. Thanks for the nudge!
Also, some really nice association info in the cookbook.
--
Try a pr(); of the data fetched from db, also have a look at :
http://manual.cakephp.org (specially the blog tutorial)
http://book.cakephp.org
On 2/24/08, Vitved <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone
>
> I'm doing a website for a friend, and wanted to try out cakephp, but
> i've ended up
Hi everyone
I'm doing a website for a friend, and wanted to try out cakephp, but
i've ended up in a dead-end.
I have a table containing dog-races. Some of the characteristics of a
given race is referred to another table e.g. size.
I've figured out how to grab the data in the "size" table and use
Category hasMany Post , Post belongsTo Category , Post belongsTo
Locality
posts table must have these two fields:
category_id
locality_id
On Feb 17, 7:04 pm, andrewharlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello,
> i understand Post hasone category and hasone locality. but can i set
> category to $b
On Feb 18, 5:26 am, dasn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a situation that I'm not sure how to build the cake model
> relationships for.
>
> I have two tables, Companies and Contacts. A Company can have many
> contacts but it also has one primary contact. I figure
hello,
i understand Post hasone category and hasone locality. but can i set
category to $belongsto Post and locality as $belongsto Post ??
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to
Can any1 help me with this? i understand Post $hasone category and
$hasone locality. but can i set category to $belongsto Post and
locality as $belongsto Post ??
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
I have a situation that I'm not sure how to build the cake model
relationships for.
I have two tables, Companies and Contacts. A Company can have many
contacts but it also has one primary contact. I figured I would set
up hasMany and belongsTo entries for the Company and Contact models
Ok, I may have figured out what I really want to do...
Instead of the HABTM relationship between games and players, i can
just access each other through the score, since every player has to
have a score in the game...
Still correct?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You recei
Actually... what I can do is instead of looping through
$player['Game'] I can loop through $player['Score'] which will contain
details about my game...
Is this how I would do this correctly?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
New to cake here... using 1.2
I've got three models:
Players
Games
Scores
class Player extends AppModel
{
public $name = 'Player';
public $hasAndBelongsToMany = array('Game');
public $hasMany = array('Score');
}
class Game extends AppModel
{
public $name = 'Game';
Hy Joaquín!
The base of my datamodel was wrong :(
I wrote: "I have three models (entities): A, B and C ", but either
of them is not an entity, only an attribute! When I was seeing the
repeated values in the same field of different records, I sed: "Let's
normalize it!" and I made a new entity
24, 2:48 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm back to thinking I'm right...someone please prove me wrong here.
>
> > If $fieldList is specified for Model::save() shouldn't it at least
> > THEN ignore the 'with&#x
king I'm right...someone please prove me wrong here.
>
> If $fieldList is specified for Model::save() shouldn't it at least
> THEN ignore the 'with' relationships? It currently does the DELETE
> query even in this case.
>
> The only other option is saveField()
I'm back to thinking I'm right...someone please prove me wrong here.
If $fieldList is specified for Model::save() shouldn't it at least
THEN ignore the 'with' relationships? It currently does the DELETE
query even in this case.
The only other option is saveField() bu
yeah that seems like a logical thing to do
On Jan 24, 1:30 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Eric, why don't you just use saveField() in this situation?
>
> On Jan 24, 1:20 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hey Eric, why don't you just use saveField() in this situation?
On Jan 24, 1:20 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know why HABTM relationships are deleted automatically on a
> Model::save() in the first place, but is this really necessar
I don't know why HABTM relationships are deleted automatically on a
Model::save() in the first place, but is this really necessary for the
'with' relationships too? They are practically standalone models so
shouldn't there be an option to preserve the current 'with'
hey pipe69e5 could you explain how did you do?
On Jan 23, 6:22 am, pipi69e5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hy AD!
>
> A little bit of thinking and the problem are working out :) Thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Hy AD!
A little bit of thinking and the problem are working out :) Thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscri
On Jan 22, 1:49 am, pipi69e5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I'm new in cakePHP (and in database modeling (and in english:)
> too)!
>
> I have three models (entities): A, B and C.
> A hasAndBelongsToMany B,
> A hasAndBelongsToMany C and
> B hasAndBelongsToMany C
> All of this join-tables has ow
Hi, I'm new in cakePHP (and in database modeling (and in english:)
too)!
I have three models (entities): A, B and C.
A hasAndBelongsToMany B,
A hasAndBelongsToMany C and
B hasAndBelongsToMany C
All of this join-tables has own attributes and I have a "biggest" ABC
join table with own attributes to
I'm not sure if I understand your question... with lists and sublists
etc, but I did something similar with events and sub-events. Your
"lists" table should contain something like (id, parent_id, name,
account_id).
class List extends AppModel {
var $name = 'List';
var $belongsTo
Hi
Thank you for your response..
The data model I presented is the logical model not the physical
model.. The physical model is set to have the pks all id.. but its
easier to keep track of things when modeling the logical model with
pks using the full name...
You mentioned that this might be the
On Nov 28, 7:45 pm, Comida411 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My question is complicated so I made a web page detailing my
> questionhttp://warmeskimo.com/cakerecur/
> Thank you
Isn't that the same as any other self referencing relationship that
works in cake without anything specific? <- hint.
My question is complicated so I made a web page detailing my question
http://warmeskimo.com/cakerecur/
Thank you
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to c
I know I'm not the first to notice this, but I can't find a solution
--
My HABTM works fine if there's at least one relationship. In these
cases, Cake deletes everything from the interstitial table and inserts
the specified relationships.
However, if there are NO relationships,
On Sep 28, 2:06 am, neromir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a few tables that I'm trying to join using Cake's built in
> relationship setup. I have a users table, comments table, and comment
> type table. I'm trying to show all of the comments to a moderator and
> as such have se
Hi,
I've got a few tables that I'm trying to join using Cake's built in
relationship setup. I have a users table, comments table, and comment
type table. I'm trying to show all of the comments to a moderator and
as such have set up a hasOne relationship from the comment table for
both the user
It seems that there is a new WITH thingy in models there are some more
people asking questions about this (including myself) As there is not
much info about it except the presentation of 1.2 :(
On Aug 31, 4:44 am, KingJackaL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I should have searched less API/manual/Goog
I should have searched less API/manual/Google, and more in this
group :x.
The solution has been posted several times here - with the way I've
fixed it having been posted by Tijs Teulings here:
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/f23b1825050ad543/014092749592de70?rnum=3#01
I've done a fair amount of searching (5+ hours) on this, but I just
cannot work it out.
Consider a set of entities associated like so:
Category <(HABTM)> Listing <(HABTM)> Location
Now, in a controller a search for all Listing's can be done as so
(this works fine):
$this->Listing->findAll();
e with an id, agent_ref,
> and area_id - but no matter what I do, I can't seem to get the system
> to work.
>
> I'm struggling to see how the relationships work in this model - can
> anyone advise?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this mess
ruggling to see how the relationships work in this model - can
anyone advise?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
In models...
MemberTeam belongsTo Team
Team belongsTo Upload
However when I query MemberTeam it retrieves the Team table but
doesn't get the Upload table.. i have tried setting the recursive
option but it still doesn't work??
is there any way to do this?
--~--~-~--~~~-
I'm not sure what you are asking. If a User has no Images, then they
won't be retrieved - why bother unbinding? If you have some Users
that can have images, and another class of Users where images are
completely unrelated - then surely there just won't be any associated
images, so why unbind? T
Hi all,
I've got a bit of a query, I have a relationship between a User and an
object I'm modelling whereby
a user may have an image associated which them as follows:
class User {
// Define relationship with images with object_id as the key in
images
var $hasMany = array('photograp
Thanks for the quick response!
I was lazy on the model names in the message. In my code they are
named according to the conventions.
Made the changes, and everything works! Thank you so much Walker &
Ketan!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
Well, I was saying hasMany with regards to Language and Country
Models. Though you are correct the Issues must have 'belongsTo'
instead of 'hasOne'
Ketan
Walker Hamilton wrote:
> Also:
>
> Issue belongsTo (not hasMany)
>
>
> Ketan is correct on the Language & Country classes
--~--~-~--
Also:
Issue belongsTo (not hasMany)
Ketan is correct on the Language & Country classes
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.
You need to have 'hasMany' defined in the Language and Country class.
Also, your table names are not following the cake convention either.
Table names must be plural and not singular. View
http://cakephp.org/files/cakesheet.pdf for more information.
zombie's head wrote:
> Ahoy-hoy,
>
> I've stu
Ahoy-hoy,
I've stumbled upon a simple database relationship problem that is
turning out to not be so simple to solve. Here's the situation I'm
setting up:
An Issue has an associated Language and Country. I figure by putting a
key to the Language and Country tables in the Issue, and defining the
Thanks, that solved the problem!!
- Anthony
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send emai
On Mar 1, 6:02 pm, "Anthony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, I'm aware this is probably a very dumb, newbie question, but you
> gotta start somewhere, right?
>
> Say I have a "users" table and a "messages" table. For each ONE user,
> there are MULTIPLE messages. However, when doing a findAll on
201 - 300 of 348 matches
Mail list logo
